Cameras in the classroom
- Thread starter Yakuda
- Start date
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
That could be covered by legislation akin to putting recorders in airline cockpits. Put protections in place. Weigh the pros and cons. With those protections, including legislation making it illegal to reveal these videos outside of legal proceedings, and the positive security aspects, as the link's Teacher of the Year advised, I support the cameras.
Correct. He was publicly advised of the rule by Damo...and, no doubt, a private lesson regarding the new rule. That's his punishment. The post was corrected. It's a done deal.
Seems fair to me. First offense, new rule. Why do you want a temp ban right off the bat?
Street Glider
Verified User
I don't have a problem with it. I don't see a single downside to it...
New avatar for you:
I am really in your head
You spent time and came up with a middle school photoshop
Did your mom help u with that or is she in jail for beating up your pussy dad after she caught him sucking cock?
Last edited:
I am really in your head
You spent time and came up with a middle school photoshop
Did your mom help u with that or is she in jail?
How does it make you feel to believe you are?
Just like your avatar. Fitting.
Neither. What about yours? Do you know where she is? Who she is? Daddy? So much hate in a person has a source. A great wound that spills hate like pus. It'll keep spilling the pus, leaving you to drown as a loser in it, until the wound is healed and you can move forward.
Part of that is you manning up and accepting responsibility for yourself, dumbass. It's the first step in the idea that failure isn't falling down but staying down. Adult fighters get back up even if it means another asskicking.
Losers are quitters and you're a loser. All haters are. Fix it and get on with your life before you end up in a gutter.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Why do you care, Karen?
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
I did very well, thanks.
They became objects of scorn when their priorities changed from teaching to indoctrinating.
Does it really surprise anyone that all the haters hate teachers too? Equal opportunity haters?
That avatar is a fact, or did Floyd not hold a pregnant girl at knife point?
As I understood it they were not for protection but to spy on teachers so they would not teach any banned subjects.
More of the illegal/prohibited activities have shifted to the restrooms where cameras or not allowed.
So is the new one, son. We were talking about you, not Floyd's criminal past. If the idea scares you, and I'm sure it does, that's fine. Learn on your own that I am right.
Did you read a RWNJ post or the link? The good thing about fear-mongering is that it reveals the fears of the mongers. LOL
I read the NEA article. Given the laws Tennessee recently passed I was skeptical it was not for the purpose of "enforcing" those laws since the reasons given sounded somewhat nebulous.
"Local districts are also tasked with determining appropriate "disciplinary action" against a teacher found to have violated the new state law, which could include termination of employment. The new rule also leaves room for the State Board of Education to potentially revoke an educator's teaching license.
Tennessee lawmakers passed a law in May that allows the state schools chief to withhold funds from schools and districts where teachers promote certain concepts about race, white privilege, systemic racism, and other social issues that GOP lawmakers believe are cynical and divisive."
[h=1]TN Education Dept. lists 14 race, history concepts that cannot be taught in classrooms[/h](1) The following concepts are Prohibited Concepts that shall not be included or promoted in a course of instruction, curriculum and instructional program, or in supplemental instructional materials:
(a) One (1) race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex;
(b) An individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, is inherently privileged, racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or subconsciously;
(c) An individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment because of the individual’s race or sex;
(d) An individual’s moral character is determined by the individual’s race or sex;
(e) An individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex;
(f) An individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or another form of psychological distress solely because of the individual’s race or sex;
(g) A meritocracy is inherently racist or sexist, or designed by a particular race or sex to oppress members of another race or sex;
(h) This state or the United States is fundamentally or irredeemably racist or sexist;
(i) Promoting or advocating the violent overthrow of the United States government;
(j) Promoting division between, or resentment of, a race, sex, religion, creed, nonviolent political affiliation, social class, or class of people;
(k) Ascribing character traits, values, moral or ethical codes, privileges, or beliefs to a race or sex, or to an individual because of the individual’s race or sex;
(l) The rule of law does not exist, but instead is a series of power relationships and struggles among racial or other groups;
(m) All Americans are not created equal and are not endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, including, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; or
Governments should deny to any person within the government’s jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.
As I understood it they were not for protection but to spy on teachers so they would not teach any banned subjects. More of the illegal/prohibited activities have shifted to the restrooms where cameras or not allowed.
Cry harder, union shill.
I read the NEA article. Given the laws Tennessee recently passed I was skeptical it was not for the purpose of "enforcing" those laws since the reasons given sounded somewhat nebulous.
"Local districts are also tasked with determining appropriate "disciplinary action" against a teacher found to have violated the new state law, which could include termination of employment. The new rule also leaves room for the State Board of Education to potentially revoke an educator's teaching license.
Tennessee lawmakers passed a law in May that allows the state schools chief to withhold funds from schools and districts where teachers promote certain concepts about race, white privilege, systemic racism, and other social issues that GOP lawmakers believe are cynical and divisive."
[h=1]TN Education Dept. lists 14 race, history concepts that cannot be taught in classrooms[/h](1) The following concepts are Prohibited Concepts that shall not be included or promoted in a course of instruction, curriculum and instructional program, or in supplemental instructional materials:
(a) One (1) race or sex is inherently superior to another race or sex;
(b) An individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, is inherently privileged, racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or subconsciously;
(c) An individual should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment because of the individual’s race or sex;
(d) An individual’s moral character is determined by the individual’s race or sex;
(e) An individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex;
(f) An individual should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or another form of psychological distress solely because of the individual’s race or sex;
(g) A meritocracy is inherently racist or sexist, or designed by a particular race or sex to oppress members of another race or sex;
(h) This state or the United States is fundamentally or irredeemably racist or sexist;
(i) Promoting or advocating the violent overthrow of the United States government;
(j) Promoting division between, or resentment of, a race, sex, religion, creed, nonviolent political affiliation, social class, or class of people;
(k) Ascribing character traits, values, moral or ethical codes, privileges, or beliefs to a race or sex, or to an individual because of the individual’s race or sex;
(l) The rule of law does not exist, but instead is a series of power relationships and struggles among racial or other groups;
(m) All Americans are not created equal and are not endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, including, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; or
Fucking lawyers, eh? LOL
I read the NEA article. Given the laws Tennessee recently passed I was skeptical it was not for the purpose of "enforcing" those laws since the reasons given sounded somewhat nebulous. "Local districts are also tasked with determining appropriate "disciplinary action" against a teacher found to have violated the new state law, which could include termination of employment. The new rule also leaves room for the State Board of Education to potentially revoke an educator's teaching license. Tennessee lawmakers that allows the state schools chief to withhold funds from schools and districts where teachers promote certain concepts about race, white privilege, systemic racism, and other social issues that GOP lawmakers believe are cynical and divisive."
How dare the duly-elected representatives of the electorate enact a law that you don't like.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
I am not one who likes rules.
But, I will honor the rules, if I want to participate in the forum!
It would be nice if all of us would follow the rules laid out by the Administration.
That way it don't look like we have some who think they are above everyone else or that we have privileged characters here!
Yakuda
Verified User
Was it? What's my favorite color? You know me right? What's my favorite flavor of ice cream? Tell us dumbass
What