I have said from the beginning that this is Ronmey's to win.
Cain Gets Hit
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.11
- Start date
I have said from the beginning that this is Ronmey's to win.
I see you didn't bother to read the thread and use context or anything. I am absolutely not going to do that for you. The post was not made in a vacuum, there is context in the thread.
That's true. I did say "at this time it seems"... It can all change rather quickly with these things, especially if the candidate didn't expect the obstacle. Hit piece it is, but it may not be standard, except in the way that this is historically the form of "attack" on powerful black men. (Note the list from earlier).
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I don't like that list. MLK Jr? Seriously? As far as I know he was never accused of engaging in non-consensual activity, and he's actually on tape screwing his brains out with women other than his wife, thanks to Hoover, a man I'm certain every con on this board would support still today. Including his tactics.
Thomas was as guilty as sin and please don't forget his victim was black. This annoys me to no end. It is repulsive what black women have to put up with. Believing Anita Hill is "racist" or being involved in a "high-tech lynching". That is so outrageous.
Also, having read his continuing statements on this, and the timeline, he is very adamant that he was never even "accused" of sexual harassment before these two women. Anita Hill is very important right there. I don't expect you to know this, but any woman who was around at the time can tell the difference in the pre-Anita Hill and post-Anita Hill corporate worlds. The Anita Hill effect simply cannot be overestimated. It changed everything.
??? I have no idea what "el Rushbo" has to say on the subject. I seriously doubt that Rush is saying he may be wrong and there may be meat to this like I did. My guess is you saw "who" made a post and thought you'd interject stupidity based on assumption rather than read what was said.
That you don't like it doesn't change the reality. Sexual exploits are the usual line of attack on black men.
In this case it is much different than Anita, who went before congress and testified. There is a large difference from Anita with two unnamed women, with undescribed accusations...
That being said, I hold that it can grow legs if Cain doesn't know how to deal with it, and especially if the accusations are true.
I think I should pay attention, as Cornholio is an expert on the subject of sh*t.
I think you can't stop yourself from saying stupid stuff about people you think are political enemies and that almost nothing you say about me has a basis in reality. You've become a cartoon character. I thought I used to remember a Dungheap that wasn't like this... But it was so long ago and so far away...
I say, "Hmm... You're right, I said it "seems at this time"... and this could really be something."
You say, "I see you're taking your queues from el Rushbo"..
I say, "What? Did he say that this could have meat?"
You say, "Boy, this is how you play the race card!"
I say, "Wow, why am I talking to you?"
It's hard to say that somebody calling you a "House Negro" isn't about race, Jarod.
I think you can't stop yourself from saying stupid stuff about people you think are political enemies and that almost nothing you say about me has a basis in reality. You've become a cartoon character. I thought I used to remember a Dungheap that wasn't like this... But it was so long ago and so far away...
Just calling 'em as I see 'em, guy. You should take a bit more time for self-reflection before commenting on others.
I agree, I was talking about Cain's reaction to being accused of sexual harrassment. I have not seen where anyone called him a "House Ni--er"
Is this when I ignore what you say and ask if you are taking a cue from el Rushbo or some other inanity? (Well, I'd have to use somebody like Olbermann, but you know what I mean.)
You have a quote of him saying this is about his race? I haven't heard him say that.
You are correct, I am wrong. I though the quote about this being a "High tech lynching" was his, it was not. It was Ann Coulter who said that.
BTW, I dont like what Coulter said, I also dont like Romney's position on abortion.
icedancer2theend
Verified User
Yeah, it's much more spot on to have Karen Finney proclaiming that republicans only like Cain Because he knows his place.
There is a whole montage of it, editorial after editorial on the media is on this subject. Much of what is said against Cain focuses on his pigmentation.