Bush the pussy..

N

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
At a speech in Canada....

Former President George W. Bush says he won't criticize President Barack Obama because Obama "deserves my silence.

--------------------------------------------------
I don't know why he just doesn't be a prick like all the former Democrat
Presidents and just blast Obama for the fun of it....
He knows he never got any respect from them....he owes them nothing but the same hatred he was shown....
 
why would anyone care about what bush says? it would serve no purpose to do so. He isn't a mover in the republican party anymore, let alone the conservative movment. He's been exiled. He'll just get flak and bad press. Plus I'm sure he wants a big break from politics.
 
Grind said:
why would anyone care about what bush says? it would serve no purpose to do so. He isn't a mover in the republican party anymore, let alone the conservative movment. He's been exiled. He'll just get flak and bad press. Plus I'm sure he wants a big break from politics.
Click to expand...

Right...thats another good reason to spew some hate on Obama...nobody cares what he says anyway...well...........except for those folks in Canada that hired him to give a speech...but thats irrelevant ....

He owes it to the Democrats just to be fair and just....do unto others as the pricks did unto you....should be the new Conservative 'words to live by'...
 
bravo said:
Right...thats another good reason to spew some hate on Obama...nobody cares what he says anyway...well...........except for those folks in Canada that hired him to give a speech...but thats irrelevant ....

He owes it to the Democrats just to be fair and just....do unto others as the pricks did unto you....should be the new Conservative 'words to live by'...
Click to expand...

we didn't impeach dubya for getting a blowjob!:cof1:
 
imagine that! a husband is reluctant to admit to getting a blow job from some woman other than his wife. Shocker! Now THAT is behavior so far removed from what most married men would do if THEY had been unfaithful, it warrants attempting to remove the man from the highest office in the land and spending MILLIONS of the taxpayer's dollars and MONTHS of the taxpayer's time trying to do so.
 
bravo said:
At a speech in Canada....

Former President George W. Bush says he won't criticize President Barack Obama because Obama "deserves my silence.

--------------------------------------------------
I don't know why he just doesn't be a prick like all the former Democrat
Presidents and just blast Obama for the fun of it....
He knows he never got any respect from them....he owes them nothing but the same hatred he was shown....
Click to expand...

Kinda makes you proud you supported the pussy?
 
maineman said:
imagine that! a husband is reluctant to admit to getting a blow job from some woman other than his wife. Shocker! Now THAT is behavior so far removed from what most married men would do if THEY had been unfaithful, it warrants attempting to remove the man from the highest office in the land and spending MILLIONS of the taxpayer's dollars and MONTHS of the taxpayer's time trying to do so.
Click to expand...

There is a little bit of a difference between not admitting something to your wife and lying under oath in an official deposition.
 
Solitary said:
There is a little bit of a difference between not admitting something to your wife and lying under oath in an official deposition.
Click to expand...


a difference in degree only, not in kind.

and a falsehood under oath is only "perjury" when it can be shown to be material to the case in question, I believe. How was consensual sex between consenting adults material to Paula Jone's allegaton of sexual harassment?

I love how folks want to make such a HUGE deal of this little irrelevant and inconsequential lie by Clinton and completely ignore the enormous lies and exaggerations of the Bush administration that led us into a six year war.

it is nothing less than grossly repugnant hypocrisy, imo.
 
maineman said:
a difference in degree only, not in kind.

and a falsehood under oath is only "perjury" when it can be shown to be material to the case in question, I believe. How was consensual sex between consenting adults material to Paula Jone's allegaton of sexual harassment?

I love how folks want to make such a HUGE deal of this little irrelevant and inconsequential lie by Clinton and completely ignore the enormous lies and exaggerations of the Bush administration that led us into a six year war.

it is nothing less than grossly repugnant hypocrisy, imo.
Click to expand...

If you take an oath to provide a truthful deposition, and then lie it is perjury.


And the only thing more grossly repugnant than the huge deal made over Clinton's lying is someone using the "Bush did it too!" rationalizations to justify it.

Yes, Bush lied and was about as inept as a president can be. But that does not change the situation concerning Clinton one iota.
 
Solitary said:
If you take an oath to provide a truthful deposition, and then lie it is perjury.


And the only thing more grossly repugnant than the huge deal made over Clinton's lying is someone using the "Bush did it too!" rationalizations to justify it.

Yes, Bush lied and was about as inept as a president can be. But that does not change the situation concerning Clinton one iota.
Click to expand...


if you are under oath, and the lawyer asks how tall you are and you say 5"9 instead of 5'7, it is not material, and is not, therefore, perjury. Clinton's little lie was not material and was certainly not deserving of impeachment, imo.

was I PLEASED that he was unfaithful to his wife in the Oval Office and then lied about it? absolutely not. I was disgusted. What disgusted me much more was the incredible waste that was the Iraq war, the incredible loss of blood and treasure, and the hypocrisy of the right in their unflagging support for it.
 
Last edited:
Maineman is right, it has to be material to the case, look up the law.

They tricked him into denying something they knew they could prove with the blue dress.

It was NOT material to the case which is why he was never convicted of perjury.

No one died for his lies either.

Thousands have died for the lies of Bush.

BTW I never heard Clinton or Gore talk shit about Bush did you?
 
maineman said:
if you are under oath, and the lawyer asks how tall you are and you say 5"9 instead of 5'7, it is not material, and is not, therefore, perjury. Clinton's little lie was not material and was certainly not deserving of impeachment, imo.

was I PLEASED that he was unfaithful to his wife in the Oval Office and then lied about it? absolutely not. I was disgusted. What disgusted me much more was the incredible waste that was the Iraq war, the incredible loss of blood and treasure, and the hypocrisy of the right in their unflagging support for it.
Click to expand...

If, during a deposition concerning a suit alleging sexual harrassment, you are asked if you had sexual relations with another employee, and you say "I have never had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. I've never had an affair with her." you are guilty of perjury.It most certainly was relevant.



And I am disgusted by the war in Iraq, the waste, the lies, and the bullshit from the Bush administration too. But using that as an excuse for, or justification of, Clinton's misconduct is a worthless argument. If you are going to argue against someone's "unflagging support" of an administration, you shouldn't appear to have your own unflagging support for other misconducts.
 
It was a consentual affair and he was accused of a harrasssment not a consentual ( perfectely legal) affair.
 
Tabasco said:
Clinton was impeached for committing perjury, not for getting head.
Click to expand...
Look up the definition of perjury and get back to me. He was NOT impeached for perjury. He was NEVER charged with perjury. He was held in contempt for obstruction.
 
evince said:
None of which are illegal.
Click to expand...

No, they are not illegal. But testimony concerning related events is allowed in lawsuits.

Nitpicking about it doesn't change the fact that he lied. Whether you think its worthy of being called perjury or not is not really the point. The President of the United States should be above that sort of shit.



Soc, what I recalled was that he was impeached for two items. One was obstruction of justice, the other was perjury.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top