breaking news from the washington post

The media, trying to avoid talking about Hillary's scandals, simply stopped covering her, well seriously slowed down the coverage, near the end. You can see it on the chart above that christiefan posted. The media started to focus solely on Trump when Hillary's mess really should have been hitting the news at least as much. Instead media outlets worked to get out the women from Hillary's campaign trying to make Trump appear like a lecherous p*ssy grabbing sexual predator, ignoring that the litigious society we have today would have had him in court almost constantly as a billionaire with roaming hands. We were regaled, often by direct Hillary employees, with stories of Trump kissing people in public (somehow witness free) and fake stories about how it was okay when he was feeling boobs but not okay when he reached down lower on First Class seats with unmovable arms he was lifting magically...

The stories became consistently less believable with each utterance, they failed (except the true believers like Desh) to paint Trump as a sexual-predation machine constantly grabbing women's p*ssies... at the same time the minimal coverage with MSDNC trying to explain how it was bad that people were giving out information that would normally remain private rather than actually talking about the information. Shooting the messenger, so to speak, without regard to what information people were actually learning.
 
I notice Desh trying to pretend that in Pennsylvania where, in Philadelphia, they found that more votes were counted (in a Hillary stronghold) than were cast (boxes holding 50 votes total listed 360 votes counted) caused the counts to be rejected in the recount. Democrats simply couldn't cheat enough to win, normally that amount of cheating would have done it but Trump got enough votes to overcome the Democrats' cheating.

As I said log ago, if Desh cared about both sides' cheating I'd be right there with her. But pretending Dems are "perfect" and "never cheat" when evidence clearly indicates otherwise just makes her a hack.
 
You're never gonna penetrate desh's world of make believe.....shes long past the point of reasonable discourse.....
 
Last edited:
Because they weren't fake. Wikileaks has never yet had to recant any story due to lawsuits, etc. Not even one.

Wikileaks seems to take a lot of pride in that....The DNC didn't even try to deny the emails....
The only question is, would they endanger their reputation as truth telling whistle blowers on the Russians, or China, or any other mysterious hacker.....

If some unknown entity would feed them lies and they put it out, their brand would be blown to bits.....Wikileaks would be no more.
 
I notice Desh trying to pretend that in Pennsylvania where, in Philadelphia, they found that more votes were counted (in a Hillary stronghold) than were cast (boxes holding 50 votes total listed 360 votes counted) caused the counts to be rejected in the recount. Democrats simply couldn't cheat enough to win, normally that amount of cheating would have done it but Trump got enough votes to overcome the Democrats' cheating.

As I said log ago, if Desh cared about both sides' cheating I'd be right there with her. But pretending Dems are "perfect" and "never cheat" when evidence clearly indicates otherwise just makes her a hack.
Oh snap....
 
Lol...no they don't....

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by evince
our own intelligence field says it was hacked asshole ?




Did evince ever actually specify exactly what the IT is shes raving about ?
Does she know ?
 
The media, trying to avoid talking about Hillary's scandals, simply stopped covering her, well seriously slowed down the coverage, near the end. You can see it on the chart above that christiefan posted. The media started to focus solely on Trump when Hillary's mess really should have been hitting the news at least as much. Instead media outlets worked to get out the women from Hillary's campaign trying to make Trump appear like a lecherous p*ssy grabbing sexual predator, ignoring that the litigious society we have today would have had him in court almost constantly as a billionaire with roaming hands. We were regaled, often by direct Hillary employees, with stories of Trump kissing people in public (somehow witness free) and fake stories about how it was okay when he was feeling boobs but not okay when he reached down lower on First Class seats with unmovable arms he was lifting magically...

The stories became consistently less believable with each utterance, they failed (except the true believers like Desh) to paint Trump as a sexual-predation machine constantly grabbing women's p*ssies... at the same time the minimal coverage with MSDNC trying to explain how it was bad that people were giving out information that would normally remain private rather than actually talking about the information. Shooting the messenger, so to speak, without regard to what information people were actually learning.

They've studied this. The email "scandal" was by far the most covered story of the campaign, and it completely dominated the last 11 days of the election.

So, I'm not sure what planet the above observations originate from.
 
And it wasn't the media painting a picture of Trump. It was HIS OWN WORDS, combined with quite a few women who credibly testified that he did to them exactly what he himself admitted to doing on tape.
 
I notice Desh trying to pretend that in Pennsylvania where, in Philadelphia, they found that more votes were counted (in a Hillary stronghold) than were cast (boxes holding 50 votes total listed 360 votes counted) caused the counts to be rejected in the recount. Democrats simply couldn't cheat enough to win, normally that amount of cheating would have done it but Trump got enough votes to overcome the Democrats' cheating.

As I said log ago, if Desh cared about both sides' cheating I'd be right there with her. But pretending Dems are "perfect" and "never cheat" when evidence clearly indicates otherwise just makes her a hack.

I call BS. What's your source on this?
 
I notice Desh trying to pretend that in Pennsylvania where, in Philadelphia, they found that more votes were counted (in a Hillary stronghold) than were cast (boxes holding 50 votes total listed 360 votes counted) caused the counts to be rejected in the recount. Democrats simply couldn't cheat enough to win, normally that amount of cheating would have done it but Trump got enough votes to overcome the Democrats' cheating.

This rates it's own thread.
 
Back
Top