breaking news from the washington post

the intelligence community had information that russia was doing its best with the help of wikileaks to get trump elected by hacking into democratic emails reporting problems of the dems but not the reps.

a presentation was made to the leaders of congress (both dems and reps) to ask if they wanted the information made public. the dems were all in favor and about half the reps. however, mccconell said that if the information was published that he would claim that it was just a partisan effort to make the reps look bad so the information was sat on.

wikileaks never noticed that all of the information being leaked to them was about the dems and none of it was about the reps.

wonderful. a foreign nation did its best to influence our presidential election, and succeeded!

And the point? The people did not "deserve" to have privy of the truth the main stream media had but refused to release...before the election? Enlighten us....since when has realeasing truth ever been considered HATE TRUTH...or hurtful truth? I for one am thankful that the truth was revealed before the left again was able to use the media to cover the tracks of another lying ass liberal.

Who'd thunk....it. The left is attempting to pull the world into a 3rd world war...because another nation, 'could have' exposed the lies being covered up by one of the political parties in this nation. Priceless. Now we know just who the real war mongers are...no? :palm:

Enlighten us: Has anyone ventured to present any evidence of the wikileaks documents released being anything other than the truth they contained? Did a foreign nation reveal anything to the people of the United State that its own government did not already have privy to? If not......why the anger at exposing the lying ass left and its agenda? Can you blame Russia? The left has continually attempted to poke it in the eye in order prompt another military conflict in order to generate and garner personal power and wealth. If telling the truth is so dangerous....let the danger begin.

The truth? You can't handle the truth?

 
Last edited:
And the point? The people did not "deserve" to have privy of the truth the main stream media had but refused to release...before the election? Enlighten us....since when has realeasing truth ever been considered HATE TRUTH...or hurtful truth? I for one am thankful that the truth was revealed before the left again used was able to use the media to cover the tracks of another lying ass liberal.

Who'd thunk....it. The left is attempting to pull the world into a 3rd world war...because another nation, 'could have' exposed the lies being covered up by one of the political parties in this nation. Priceless. Now we know just who the real war mongers are...no? :palm:




dear fucking idiot,


OUR OWN INTELL PEOPLE


remember when you fucks lied about OBL being a non threat to swing at Clinton while he went after him.

that gave us 911 you fucking evil asshole



fuck you very much
 
Not in the least, they stood on their own merits. The fact that they are both women shouldn't be a factor in deciding whether they cut the mustard.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
yes. But that's really all Hilary put out there ( identity politics) and fears about Trump.
She had nothing to offer for the middle class. Bernie would have been much better as a candidate
 
millions more Americans wanted her president over trumpy asshole



you won with a card trick NOT the peoples APPROVAL



putin helped it happen


so you jump to your knees and shove Putins cock down your throat instantly
 
millions more Americans wanted her president over trumpy asshole



you won with a card trick NOT the peoples APPROVAL



putin helped it happen


so you jump to your knees and shove Putins cock down your throat instantly

Right...that's why we have President Trump. Correct comrade? Its nothing but an excuse. There is no evidence that any polling place was hacked. The only crying is because THE TRUTH was exposed that was supposed to be covered up by the media.....that used fake news itself in an attempt to swing the election toward the confirmed LIAR. Its over....game, set, and match. Investigate all you want.....just like the supposed, recount, the unfaithful EC voter, have failed to materialize....this will come to nothing because the only thing exposed was TRUTH.

You still have about 5 weeks to "dream the impossible dream"...then reality sets in...over the next four years. Elections have consequences.
 
Right...that's why we have President Trump. Correct comrade? Its nothing but an excuse. There is no evidence that any polling place was hacked. The only crying is because THE TRUTH was exposed that was supposed to be covered up by the media.....that used fake news itself in an attempt to swing the election toward the confirmed LIAR. Its over....game, set, and match. Investigate all you want.....just like the supposed, recount, the unfaithful EC voter, have failed to materialize....this will come to nothing because the only thing exposed was TRUTH.

You still have about 5 weeks to "dream the impossible dream"...then reality sets in...over the next four years. Elections have consequences.




document your claim asshole
 
https://thevotingnews.com/want-to-k...-hacked-look-at-the-ballots-j-alex-halderman/




Verified Voting Blog: Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots | J. Alex Halderman
Nov 25 2016
» J. Alex Halderman
This response was originally posted at Medium.com*and is cross-posted here with permission of the author.
You may have read at NYMag that I’ve been in discussions with the Clinton campaign about whether it might wish to seek recounts in critical states. That*article, which includes somebody else’s description of my views, incorrectly describes the reasons manually checking ballots is an essential security safeguard (and includes some incorrect numbers, to boot). Let me set the record straight about what I and other leading election security experts have actually been saying to the campaign and everyone else who’s willing to listen.*
How might a foreign government hack America’s voting machines to change the outcome of a presidential election? Here’s one possible scenario. First, the attackers would probe election offices well in advance in order to find ways to break into their computers. Closer to the election, when it was clear from polling data which states would have close electoral margins, the attackers might spread malware into voting machines in some of these states, rigging the machines to shift a few percent of the vote to favor their desired candidate. This malware would likely be designed to remain inactive during pre-election tests, do its dirty business during the election, then erase itself when the polls close. A skilled attacker’s work might leave no visible signs — though the country might be surprised when results in several close states were off from pre-election polls.
Could anyone be brazen enough to try such an attack? A few years ago, I might have said that sounds like science fiction, but 2016 has seen unprecedented cyberattacks aimed at interfering with the election. This summer, attackers broke into the email system of the Democratic National Committee and, separately, into the email account of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, and leaked private messages. Attackers infiltrated the voter registration systems of two states, Illinois and Arizona, and stole voter data. And there’s evidence that hackers attempted to breach election offices in several other states.
In all these cases, Federal agencies publicly asserted that senior officials in the Russian government commissioned these attacks. Russia has sophisticated cyber-offensive capabilities, and has shown a willingness to use them to hack elections. In 2014, during the presidential election in Ukraine, attackers linked to Russia sabotaged the country’s vote-counting infrastructure and, according to published reports, Ukrainian officials succeeded only at the last minute in defusing vote-stealing malware that was primed to cause the wrong winner to be announced. Russia is not the only country with the ability to pull off such an attack on American systems — most of the world’s military powers now have sophisticated cyberwarfare capabilities.
 
http://pakobserver.net/us-polls-attempted-hack-found-at-georgias-voter-database/




US polls: Attempted hack found at Georgia’s voter database
By Webmaster -
December 10, 2016

Georgia
An attempted hack into Georgia’s voter regisration database was traced back to the Department of Homeland Security, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday.
A third-party security firm working for the state detected the unsuccessful breach and linked it to an IP address associated with DHS, the report said. Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp reportedly sent a letter to Homeland Security asking the department to confirm whether an attempt was made.
In his letter, The Wall Street Journal reported, Kemp asked the department to confirm whether a scan attempt was made, who authorized the scan and whether the department was scanning other state systems without authorization.
Leading up to the election, questions were raised about the security of state computer systems that protect voting data.
Homeland Security reportedly considered declaring election systems as “critical infrastructure,” which would have given the federal agency the authority to protect the systems. A spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security didn’t immediately respond to the publication’s request for comment.—Agencies
 
document your claim asshole

Reality check: You are the one making the claim, Russia Hacked the election, yet you want me to document your lies? Its simple you nor no one can prove any polls were hacked. In fact the prima facie evidence offered in the Wis. recount proves that no one hacked any polling place. The FAKE NEWS is the media presenting an attack on Russia for a supposed hacking of the polls in the election when in reality if they were involved at all they accomplished was a revelation of hidden truths....the left attempted to keep covered until after the election. That's the real story. :)

You have 5 weeks to keep attempting to spit out this bit....but come Jan.20, 2017, the free range lying by the left will come to an end.
 
https://thevotingnews.com/want-to-k...-hacked-look-at-the-ballots-j-alex-halderman/




Verified Voting Blog: Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots | J. Alex Halderman
Nov 25 2016
» J. Alex Halderman
This response was originally posted at Medium.com*and is cross-posted here with permission of the author.
You may have read at NYMag that I’ve been in discussions with the Clinton campaign about whether it might wish to seek recounts in critical states. That*article, which includes somebody else’s description of my views, incorrectly describes the reasons manually checking ballots is an essential security safeguard (and includes some incorrect numbers, to boot). Let me set the record straight about what I and other leading election security experts have actually been saying to the campaign and everyone else who’s willing to listen.*
How might a foreign government hack America’s voting machines to change the outcome of a presidential election? Here’s one possible scenario. First, the attackers would probe election offices well in advance in order to find ways to break into their computers. Closer to the election, when it was clear from polling data which states would have close electoral margins, the attackers might spread malware into voting machines in some of these states, rigging the machines to shift a few percent of the vote to favor their desired candidate. This malware would likely be designed to remain inactive during pre-election tests, do its dirty business during the election, then erase itself when the polls close. A skilled attacker’s work might leave no visible signs — though the country might be surprised when results in several close states were off from pre-election polls.
Could anyone be brazen enough to try such an attack? A few years ago, I might have said that sounds like science fiction, but 2016 has seen unprecedented cyberattacks aimed at interfering with the election. This summer, attackers broke into the email system of the Democratic National Committee and, separately, into the email account of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, and leaked private messages. Attackers infiltrated the voter registration systems of two states, Illinois and Arizona, and stole voter data. And there’s evidence that hackers attempted to breach election offices in several other states.
In all these cases, Federal agencies publicly asserted that senior officials in the Russian government commissioned these attacks. Russia has sophisticated cyber-offensive capabilities, and has shown a willingness to use them to hack elections. In 2014, during the presidential election in Ukraine, attackers linked to Russia sabotaged the country’s vote-counting infrastructure and, according to published reports, Ukrainian officials succeeded only at the last minute in defusing vote-stealing malware that was primed to cause the wrong winner to be announced. Russia is not the only country with the ability to pull off such an attack on American systems — most of the world’s military powers now have sophisticated cyberwarfare capabilities.

Right...."how might"....is a very objective word. Just how stupid are you. Again you are pasting an article that proves nothing its an opinion piece by yet another leftist asshole. Did you read or comprehend the words..."HOW MIGHT"? "Would likely"....etc.

There is no testable evidence....except the recount in the state of Wis. How's that going as evidence that the polls were actually hacked?

Again....its SOUR GRAPES. You are looking for everything but the actual cause for the loss of power. THE PEOPLE rejected failed liberal policies. Its not rocket science. :)
 
Right...."how might"....is a very objective word. Just how stupid are you. Again you are pasting an article that proves nothing its an opinion piece by yet another leftist asshole. Did you read or comprehend the words..."HOW MIGHT"? "Would likely"....etc.

There is no testable evidence....except the recount in the state of Wis. How's that going as evidence that the polls were actually hacked?

Again....its SOUR GRAPES. You are looking for everything but the actual cause for the loss of power. THE PEOPLE rejected failed liberal policies. Its not rocket science. :)

do you really think putins sperm in your mouth is worth giving up your soul
 
Putin feared her. Trump is his puppet.

trump even refuses to accept intel briefings on this. I'd like to know just what's going on with him and Putin.

"Former senior U.S. national security officials are dismayed at Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s repeated refusal to accept the judgment of intelligence professionals that Russia stole files from the Democratic National Committee computers in an effort to influence the U.S. election...

Trump has assured supporters that, if elected, he would surround himself with experts on defense and foreign affairs, where he has little experience. But when it comes to Russia, he has made it clear that he is not listening to intelligence officials, the former officials said...."
 
Not in the least, they stood on their own merits. The fact that they are both women shouldn't be a factor in deciding whether they cut the mustard.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

Well, the actual voters think Hillary stands on her own merits, more so than trump. trump should thank his lucky stars we have an electoral college.
 
Back
Top