Boulder police warn of 'active shooter at the King Soopers' supermarket

Nomad said:
I didn't say it had to do directly with the existence of guns.

I said it was because of THE EXCESSIVELY EASY ACCESS to them.

Do you understand the difference?

They need to be MORE DIFFICULT TO OBTAIN.



How do we know you won't at some point n the future?

You don't seem particularly mentally stable to me.



Big surprise.

But hey, thanks for sharing.
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with the ease to get them, unless you mean for criminals! I had to go through a background check, so does every law abiding citizen!

Your insults are duly noted!
I am a Christian man who would never shoot anyone except in self defense or defense of my family!

My mental state is fine, I just do not make rash emotional decisions! I look at the real problems!
 
SmarterthanYou said:
hey, dumb and dumber..........before heller, there were multiple court rulings that said differently. that the 2nd Amendment meant exactly that..........any gun any where and government had no power over it. Scalia rewrote the 2nd Amendment, unconstitutionally, to appease cowardly pussies like you. so take your government worshipping crotch hole back in the corner and shut your fucking pie hole. when I want any more bullshit spewed out of your cum receptacle, i'll tell you
Click to expand...

Before Heller doesn’t mean shit and they didn’t address what Heller did.

Checkmate, stupid fuck. You lost again.

Stupidest motherfucker on the forum.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
yes, you are



"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."
: Robert H. Jackson, US Supreme Court Justice West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)

It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error. — Justice Robert H. Jackson

The right of the people to keep and bear arms has been recognized by the General Government; but the best security of that right after all is, the military spirit, that taste for martial exercises, which has always distinguished the free citizens of these States....Such men form the best barrier to the liberties of America — Gazette of the United States, October 14, 1789.

There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787)

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)]

A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution... The power to impose a license tax on the exercise of these freedoms is indeed as potent as the power of censorship which this Court has repeatedly struck down... a person cannot be compelled 'to purchase, through a license fee or a license tax, the privilege freely granted by the constitution.' —MURDOCK V. PENNSYLVANIA 319 US 105 (1942)

The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]

The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now. — SOUTH CAROLINA v. US, 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905)

The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people; or of peaceable assemblies by them, for any purposes whatsoever, and in any number, whenever they may see occasion. —ST. GEORGE TUCKER'S BLACKSTONE

The right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny, which though now appears remote in America, history has proven to be always possible. — Senator Hubert H. Humphrey

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government. — Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist (#28)

As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms. — Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian" in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1.

"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity, and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude, and perseverance. Let us remember that `if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.' It is a very serious consideration...that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event." --Samuel Adams, speech in Boston, 1771

The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed;... — Thomas Jefferson to Justice John Cartwright, 1824. ME 16:45.

The writings of scholars who have written on the subject are virtually united on the point that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms, not simply the state national guards. — PROFESSOR GLENN HARLAN REYNOLDS

That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms... — Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87

The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them. — Zachariah Johnson, 3 Elliot, Debates at 646

The prohibition is general. No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both. — William Rawle, A View of the Constitution 125-6 (2nd ed. 1829)

Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state government, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people. — Tench Coxe, Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.

The provision in the Constitution granting the right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the Legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff. [People vs. Zerillo, 219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)]



choke on that, pussy
Click to expand...

Choke on Heller.
 
domer76 said:
We’ve gone over this before, ignorant prick. Ad nauseam.

Heller says gun ownership is a right using weapons usually intended for personal protection in the home. Beyond that, says Heller, you have NO RIGHT to possess any weapon, any place and any time.

Bitch all you want, stupid fuck, that’s the constitutional ruling.

Checkmate again, bitch.
Click to expand...

It was an infringement, and therefor null and void!

The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. ... An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
 
domer76 said:
Before Heller doesn’t mean shit and they didn’t address what Heller did.

Checkmate, stupid fuck. You lost again.

Stupidest motherfucker on the forum.
Click to expand...

before heller means nothing? so we are no longer a constitutional republic, but an oligarchy your shitstain brain pan worships.

THAT makes you the stupidest fucker in the country
 
domer76 said:
Choke on Heller.
Click to expand...

The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now. — SOUTH CAROLINA v. US, 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905)

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137: “The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law.”

choke on that, retard
 
Wolverine said:
It has nothing to do with the ease to get them, unless you mean for criminals! I had to go through a background check, so does every law abiding citizen!

Your insults are duly noted!
I am a Christian man who would never shoot anyone except in self defense or defense of my family!

My mental state is fine, I just do not make rash emotional decisions! I look at the real problems!
Click to expand...

Then nobody was talking about you.

The idiot who shot up the spas in Atlanta legally bought his gun the same day he went out and shot and killed innocent people.

If you're the supposed "Christian" you claim to be, you'd be all for anything that helps stem the tide of gun related violence gripping our nation.

But like most phony-ass fakers who call themselves Christians, you only talk the talk.
 
Diesel said:
You think that the shooting in my neighborhood yesterday was caused by the internet?
Click to expand...

Didnt say that. Why cant people interpret what they read anymore? Or...... are they just doing it to be argumentative with their perceived political enemies? Inquiring minds want to know...
 
domer76 said:
Choke on Heller.
Click to expand...

Don't the Republicans say "choke on Roe v. Wade"?

SCOTUS makes rulings on laws. Congress writes the laws, but those laws have to pass a Constitutional litmus test.

$20 says the "shooter" is a nutjob, his neighbors knew he was a nutjob but there was nothing to be done because Democrats don't give a fuck about nutjobs unless they use a gun and Republicans use them as their constituents.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you can't handle the truth. go cry harder, snowflake
Click to expand...

Such an internet tough guy.....

nerd-464221.jpg


:palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top