Blacks selling black people to blacks

I knew it was a mistake to open this thread.

All morning, I saw the title, and was like, "You know the lame point he's trying to make. You know what that thread is. Don't go in there. Just don't."

But it's like a horror movie when you're squinting your eyes or something. Eventually, you've just gotta look.
Fuck off then, it's not as if you're going to say anything sensible anyway.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Libyans are Berbers AND Arabs-with a smattering of Egyptians, and native Tuareg in the south deserts.


The "migrant" are sub-Saharan blacks who are economic refugees. they are NOT from ISIS strongholds-
ISIS in in Libya itself, although there are some loose affiliates all over the Maghreb and the Sahel regions.

The Libyan transport them across the desert to to Libyan coastline, where they are put on small craft and set
adrift for Europe ( the island of Lampedusa is a main point)..

Libyans do not sell them into slavery -they sell the migrants to each other -like a commodity.
Or if captured put into Libyan detention centers
The money is made from the transport and shelter of the migrants who pay for the transport

Could the flow of migrants to Europe be stopped?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ec86cdfe1ed_story.html?utm_term=.9a9c7888dbac

^ further reading

Used to be, but more and more are entering Spain via Morocco.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/10/spain-could-top-greece-migrant-sea-arrivals-2017/


Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
How do you think slavery started? It was blacks selling blacks. Usually a tribes enemy. Guess homeschooling didn't work out so well for you huh?

no it started when someone tried to BUY SLAVES idiot


no buyers no slaves huh


why do you people do this shit?
 
no it started when someone tried to BUY SLAVES idiot


no buyers no slaves huh


why do you people do this shit?

No producers, no market lol.

The heroin producers are no less guilty than the drug pushers on the street. The same holds true with the European slave trade: it took both consumers and suppliers. Take away either element, and it wouldn’t have existed.

ALL races share in the ancestral guilt of slavery—-it’s not just a ‘white thing’. That’s the unvarnished and politically incorrect truth.

Why people obsess over such things is beyond me. All the principal actors are long gone.
 
This is a great article in the Gleaner, at least they are prepared to face the unpalatable truth that PC obsessed America chooses to ignore. I am hoping there will come a day when Americans can confront the past like they are doing in Jamaica but I won't hold my breath.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20151025/africas-role-slavery



Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Ok, it's obvious that I'm talking to yet another diehard moron, so I bid you adieu.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk


Is there a reason why reality is so abhorrent to you
 
This is a great article in the Gleaner, at least they are prepared to face the unpalatable truth that PC obsessed America chooses to ignore. I am hoping there will come a day when Americans can confront the past like they are doing in Jamaica but I won't hold my breath.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20151025/africas-role-slavery



Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

No producers, no market lol.

The heroin producers are no less guilty than the drug pushers on the street. The same holds true with the European slave trade: it took both consumers and suppliers. Take away either element, and it wouldn’t have existed.

ALL races share in the ancestral guilt of slavery—-it’s not just a ‘white thing’. That’s the unvarnished and politically incorrect truth.

Why people obsess over such things is beyond me. All the principal actors are long gone.


You're the one that's pretending there's anything to obsess about here
 
The Civil War was NOT fought to free the slaves, you ignorant fool. How could it be when

1. There were four UNION states that practiced slavery throughout the war. KY MD MO DE. Had 300,000 slaves total.

2. There were many UNION generals who were slave owners. Even Grant had a slave and his wife had a bunch of them.

3. Lincoln asked slave owner Robert E Lee to be commander of all UNION forces.

The idea that the CW was about freeing the slaves is not only wrong, it is preposterous. It's fake news the media has been feeding us for 150 years.

1) While those four states technically stayed in the union, all four were border states that were split between union and confederate. The James and Youngers all fought for the confederacy. Just some of the more infamous examples.

2) Union generals having slaves prior to the start of the war didn't mean they weren't fighting to end the issue of slavery.

3) Just because Lincoln asked Lee to lead the Union forces doesn't mean they weren't fighting to end slavery.

While it was in part a states right 'fight'... the main issue at the time the states wanted the 'right' to determine was SLAVERY.
 
This is a great article in the Gleaner, at least they are prepared to face the unpalatable truth that PC obsessed America chooses to ignore. I am hoping there will come a day when Americans can confront the past like they are doing in Jamaica but I won't hold my breath.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20151025/africas-role-slavery

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

I'll confront the past right now. The first slaves brought to what is now the USA were purchased by the ENGLISH. In Jamestown. In the early 1600's.
 
Do you think that is taught in schools, universities or depicted in Hollywood films? Is it fuck, the Jamaicans are far ahead of you in confronting the unpalatable truth. So spare me your pompous PC platitudes.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

Are you kidding? Yes. it is taught in schools. Yes. It is depicted in movies. Do you accept the responsibility for the English Empire's role in expanding slavery throughout the world?
 
Are you kidding? Yes. it is taught in schools. Yes. It is depicted in movies. Do you accept the responsibility for the English Empire's role in expanding slavery throughout the world?
I have yet to see a modern Hollywood film where the true extent of slave trading by African tribes or Arabs has ever been highlighted. I also doubt that with the PC nature of modern US education that it is mentioned in anything but a cursory manner. Indeed universities with their safe spaces, micro-aggressions and trigger warnings are hardly likely to dwell on it either for fear of offending the snowflakes.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
I have yet to see a modern Hollywood film where the true extent of slave trading by African tribes or Arabs has ever been highlighted. I also doubt that with the PC nature of modern US education that it is mentioned in anything but a cursory manner. Indeed universities with their safe spaces, micro-aggressions and trigger warnings are hardly likely to dwell on it either for fear of offending the snowflakes.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk


So all you got is hate you got actually no proof. Figures, classicc right-wing trumpster
 
Back
Top