Bills would curtail objections at future Jan. 6 vote counts

every court petitioned found no fraud, correct?

Ah, but did that make a difference to your friends who attacked the Capitol over false claims of fraud? Nope.

So it wasn't resolved because you are still here running your big, fat, fucking mouth about election fraud YOU CAN ONLY THEORIZE because it doesn't exist in any form that you can point to as evidence.

Your feelings don't mean shit.
 
more trump derangement syndrome.

Well you're spreading lies about election fraud in order to undermine confidence in the elections because none of them are producing results you like.

And you're not even doing a good job of that because you're theorizing that there are places for fraud to occur, even though that fraud hasn't occurred in 240 years.

So it's about something else...not election fraud, not the sanctity of the vote, not even "freedom"...you simply don't accept democracy, which is why all you do is sit back and attack it from the safety of anonymity JPP provides you, of which you take full advantage.
 
Laws to curtail objections are wildly popular with authoritarians.

You can object at the state level since you're the assholes who want state legislatures doing all this shit anyway.

FFS can't you goddamn, brain-damaged morons be consistent just ONCE?

Do you all have to be the dumbest fuckers on the planet? Are you trying to compete to be the World's Biggest Dumbass? Because you would definitely make it to the semi-finals in a Pageant of Stupidity.
 
Ah, but did that make a difference to your friends who attacked the Capitol over false claims of fraud? Nope.
more leftist idiocy from you.............'my friends', you idiot.

So it wasn't resolved because you are still here running your big, fat, fucking mouth about election fraud YOU CAN ONLY THEORIZE because it doesn't exist in any form that you can point to as evidence.
isn't it fucking funny that you morons can find fraud if your candidate loses ROFL........sit down child.
 
Well you're spreading lies about election fraud in order to undermine confidence in the elections because none of them are producing results you like.

And you're not even doing a good job of that because you're theorizing that there are places for fraud to occur, even though that fraud hasn't occurred in 240 years.

So it's about something else...not election fraud, not the sanctity of the vote, not even "freedom"...you simply don't accept democracy, which is why all you do is sit back and attack it from the safety of anonymity JPP provides you, of which you take full advantage.

TRIGGERED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

come back if you regain some sanity
 
more leftist idiocy from you.............'my friends', you idiot.

They are your friends, you were in the same Nazi club, and you espouse all their Nazi bullshit here, so how are they NOT your friends?

And they attacked the Capitol over the same lie you're telling right here.


isn't it fucking funny that you morons can find fraud if your candidate loses ROFL........sit down child.

What the fuck are you talking about?
 
TRIGGERED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

come back if you regain some sanity

Actually, your post here is the triggered post.

And the reason it's a triggered post is because you couldn't address anything in what I wrote so like a pussy, you try to dismiss it because confronting it is too scary for you.

We both know you don't believe there's really any fraud or possibility of it, but you have a persona you need to maintain here so you will continue to argue something you don't even believe.
 
They are your friends, you were in the same Nazi club, and you espouse all their Nazi bullshit here, so how are they NOT your friends?

And they attacked the Capitol over the same lie you're telling right here.

What the fuck are you talking about?

you're a delusional lunatic.............you have absolutely no sense of reality, only your perceptions of things you need to believe in order to cope with your stupidity
 
your hyperbolic bullshit is your own. that isn't what I said, fuckstick

Either you have no clue what you are talking about or you are completely nuts. There really are no other choices. The bill deals with the process in Congress and objections there.

In the case of the process before certified results get to Congress, if one person can trigger an investigation then an investigation would have to be triggered for every person that objects. That would be complete nonsense and tie up every election. So, all a group would have to do is object and then object again when the first objection fails and then object again and then object again ad infinitum and the investigations would never end since every objection would require an investigation and there is no time limit to when the objections have to end.
 
Actually, your post here is the triggered post.

And the reason it's a triggered post is because you couldn't address anything in what I wrote so like a pussy, you try to dismiss it because confronting it is too scary for you.

We both know you don't believe there's really any fraud or possibility of it, but you have a persona you need to maintain here so you will continue to argue something you don't even believe.

and now we have your pee wee herman defense.........you need some serious therapy
 
Either you have no clue what you are talking about or you are completely nuts. There really are no other choices. The bill deals with the process in Congress and objections there.

In the case of the process before certified results get to Congress, if one person can trigger an investigation then an investigation would have to be triggered for every person that objects. That would be complete nonsense and tie up every election. So, all a group would have to do is object and then object again when the first objection fails and then object again and then object again ad infinitum and the investigations would never end since every objection would require an investigation and there is no time limit to when the objections have to end.

But that's what he wants!

He doesn't want the government to function because he is fundamentally opposed to democracy.

None of them want a functional government because it would render their chief trait -that government is the problem- moot.

Like PJ O'Rourke said, "Republicans say government is the problem, then get elected and prove it."
 
Back
Top