Bills would curtail objections at future Jan. 6 vote counts

Ah, but did that make a difference to your friends who attacked the Capitol over false claims of fraud? Nope.

So it wasn't resolved because you are still here running your big, fat, fucking mouth about election fraud YOU CAN ONLY THEORIZE because it doesn't exist in any form that you can point to as evidence.

Your feelings don't mean shit.

No, you can't wish the evidence of election fraud away, dude. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
 
Well you're spreading lies about election fraud in order to undermine confidence in the elections because none of them are producing results you like.

And you're not even doing a good job of that because you're theorizing that there are places for fraud to occur, even though that fraud hasn't occurred in 240 years.

So it's about something else...not election fraud, not the sanctity of the vote, not even "freedom"...you simply don't accept democracy, which is why all you do is sit back and attack it from the safety of anonymity JPP provides you, of which you take full advantage.

You can't wish the evidence of election fraud away, dude. You can't wish away people's judgement of that evidence either.
 
Actually, your post here is the triggered post.

And the reason it's a triggered post is because you couldn't address anything in what I wrote so like a pussy, you try to dismiss it because confronting it is too scary for you.

We both know you don't believe there's really any fraud or possibility of it, but you have a persona you need to maintain here so you will continue to argue something you don't even believe.

LIF. Omniscience fallacy. Denial of history. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
 
Either you have no clue what you are talking about or you are completely nuts. There really are no other choices. The bill deals with the process in Congress and objections there.
Discard of the Constitution of the United States. The bill is unconstitutional. See Article I and the 1st amendment.
In the case of the process before certified results get to Congress, if one person can trigger an investigation then an investigation would have to be triggered for every person that objects. That would be complete nonsense and tie up every election. So, all a group would have to do is object and then object again when the first objection fails and then object again and then object again ad infinitum and the investigations would never end since every objection would require an investigation and there is no time limit to when the objections have to end.
Unconstitutional. See Article I and II and the 1st amendment. Congress does NOT have authority to choose the electors for any State.
 
Fine, Conservatives...

Oppose this bill and when Vice President Harris refuses to certify Trump's 2024 election win, you can all rest assured knowing you caused that to happen and there's not a goddamn thing you can do about it.
 
But that's what he wants!

He doesn't want the government to function because he is fundamentally opposed to democracy.

None of them want a functional government because it would render their chief trait -that government is the problem- moot.

Like PJ O'Rourke said, "Republicans say government is the problem, then get elected and prove it."

There is no democracy. The United States was never a democracy. Redefinition fallacy (oligarchy<->democracy).
 
really....we had one in November, 2020 and we have another in 42 days........

We had one in November 2020, which at the time you said was fraudulent, and then continued to say that for two months after the election, but were conspicuously on JPP all day 1/6 when you could have been fighting the fraud in DC.

So how come you did that?
 
Fine, Conservatives...

Oppose this bill and when Vice President Harris refuses to certify Trump's 2024 election win, you can all rest assured knowing you caused that to happen and there's not a goddamn thing you can do about it.

He doesn't have that authority.
 
Back
Top