Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself and Democrats.
Biden seeks to motivate voters from all parties against ‘Maga Republicans destroying
- Thread starter BidenPresident
- Start date
Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself and Democrats.
Indeed they are. They are both fascists and communists. Democrats are socialists. They would bring back slavery if they could.
RQAA.
Talking to yourself now?
Bulverism fallacy.
Abortion is universal but laws about abortion are not. They vary greatly from state to state just like laws on education, criminal law, marriage, divorce, gun control, and multiple other issues vary by state. It is part of the division of powers created by the Constitution.
Try reading it when you finish posting.
What makes you think Alito was telling the truth in his decision when he didn't tell the truth during his confirmation hearing?
You didn't prove it because you didn't link to the correct post, and you literally said the first post was irrelevant because it undermined the fake argument you're making.
I've linked to those posts, you didn't...and then you lied and said you didn't know how to quote a post.
That was a fucking lie because you're quoting my posts all the time, in this thread even.
And that post from 4/27 had already listed the first two steps that Trump and the GOP took, and then the third step was to cancel it out of safety concerns, which Trump tried to do in July 2020. I even linked to his tweet for you, because I'm such a nice guy.
All that humiliation has forced you into acting like a sophist because you just can't stand the fact that someone has better instincts, judgment, and character than you.
THIS is Stalinist:
Caused by Democrats. It is Democrats that taught this kid to 'choose his gender' and get him so fucked up he tries suicide.
Here's why all his desperate flailing and insulting bullshit will go nowhere. I hope you stock up on your meds. There will be a huge run on them this fall.
Obama’s legacy in graphical form:
Murder is not a 'medical decision'.
Then eliminate Democrat election fraud, which was so severe in 2020 that the election faulted. You already have the right to vote. You do NOT have the right to vote multiple times, fake vote, destroy votes, or change election law against the Constitution.
No such right. Carry a weapon.
No such right. Carry a weapon.
LMAO!
OK, so at least you're now admitting that abortion is a federal issue since it's universal and it makes no sense to have states pass different laws for it when it's the same procedure in Kansas as it is in Vermont.
Marriage and divorce? You might wanna check your sources there.
OK, so where in the Constitution does it say that health care is a state issue?
And in fact, wouldn't it be federal since the government's insurance program is Medicare, which is accepted in every state?
So you didn't actually SAY what the specific reason is. You just listed a bunch of other topics and lumped abortion in it, but you never explained why.
You said yourself that the abortion procedure is universal, so why is it a state issue then? What is the specific reason, and don't just appeal to the authority of the Consitution...you need to explain yourself and your position without doing that.
I know that's going to be a challenge for you since you're not accustomed to doing that kind of work because of how incredibly fucking lazy you are.
Alito did not "trick" me. Roe was established law until it wasn't--like segregation, gay marriage, gay sex. Were you upset when those established laws were overturned? Did they "trick" you?
We never know how the court will rule in the future. You can't go by "instinct" but by history and tradition and law.
I never assured anybody Roe would not be overturned. I said I didn't think it would as a reaction to a post about V. P. Harris who said she did not think it would be overturned. I guess she has shit instincts.
The Dobbs decision is current law, Alito's confirmation hearings are not.
I didn't say I didn't know how to quote a post but to link to a post but I did so later. I posted your exact post where you said Trump would cancel the election and you continue to lie about it.
Here is your post and the link:So, of course, Flash was wrong... (justplainpolitics.com)
"NY won't be the last either. This is what Trump and the GOP have been dreaming of since this COVID outbreak started. Any excuse they can use to cancel elections, they will use it.
Step 1: Delay or cancel primaries (already happened)
Step 2: Oppose mail-in balloting by destroying the post office (already happening)
Step 3: Cancel the general election out of concerns for "safety"; concerns that could have been addressed, if not for Step #2.
You keep denying you said it but here it is.
Now you are lying about what Alito said in Dobbs. You are diverting from the fact that I had to prove to you that he said it to discussing what he said in his confirmation hearings. Now you are pretending you read Dobbs before I did when you did not even know what it said.
You need a basic American government class. Because something is universal does not mean it is a federal issue. Abortion laws have varied widely--time period, method, patient age eligibility, exceptions, parental permission, penalties.
Don't need to: Age requirements, medical requirements, reasons for divorce, spousal support, property division, common law.
It is a concurrent power exercised by both federal and state. Medicare is for older citizens. Most states have some healthcare programs for those under 65.
I shouldn't have to explain such basic stuff to you but you obviously never learned it and are too lazy to look it up. Or, maybe you just forgot it like you have so many other things and make-up other stuff in its place.
So then Roe wasn't overturned?
Yeah, he tricked you...you admitted as such that you didn't expect Alito to reverse Roe, even after saying it was settled law.
So since he broke your trust there, why would you put more trust in him?
He's already made it clear that his word means nothing.
So are you stupid for still trusting him, or are you just bitter that I called your poor instincts out?
No, because all those decisions gave rights to people, none of them took rights away.
And let's remember that Roe WASN'T established law since Alito contradicted his claims during his confirmation hearing that it was by reversing it.
Yes we do. We know because you helped make SCOTUS this way by throwing your vote away on joke candidates because you have a massive fucking ego.
So do you still think your decision to cast a vote for someone you knew NOTHING ABOUT was the right decision?
And since you're saying this now, you can't say that the other decisions having to do with the right to privacy are safe from being reversed.
Don't think I just didn't notice your goalpost shift there.
You seem to be conceding the point now that the Conservatives on SCOTUS are liars who took you for a ride once already and are primed to do so again, by saying you can't know how the court will rule in the future.
I mean, you literally just said earlier that because of what Alito wrote, those other freedoms aren't under threat to be taken away by Alito.
But now, you're saying something completely different.
Sad.
What history, tradition, and law was used to reverse Roe?
You literally said before that those other freedoms are safe, but then you said "we never know how the court will rule in the future". < - So Flash you can't say that those other freedoms aren't threatened because you JUST SAID that we never know how the court will rule in the future.
Is one of those possibilities that the court could overturn Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell? Yes.
So once again, you're making an assurance based on something a liar has written, while saying that for everything else, we don't know how the court will rule.
My discussion had nothing to do with whether we could believe Alito but whether Dobbs said it only applied to abortion. You claimed it did not because you had not read it and I posted the paragraph to prove what it said. That was my only point and you start talking about confirmation hearings, whether Alito tricked us, etc. to divert from the fact that you got it wrong because you had not read the decision when this discussion occurred.