Being a White Supremacist Grounds for Firing

Hate speech within the work environment is grounds for termination in most of corporate America...

I support that 100%...
So should you.
Great. I do agree with this to the extent that if the customers or clients of any business are subjected to any form of bigotry or racism by an employee, it would be grounds for firing. But what are you going to do when the KKK puts their hoods back on? Will you make it illegal for them to wear them? What about the alt-left? Is it going to be okay for them to wear their black hoodies while they assault counter-protestors with bicycle locks? Antifa was in Charlottesville too, ya know.
 
It is the Hate Whitey socialist racists, like you, that hide their faces with hoods, bandanas, and sunglasses. :palm:

Those accessories were probably worn for protection against pepper spray and tear gas and not for anonymity .

No one would get fired for protesting against racism.
 
nothings ever been national. and it's not a hatred for police as much as it is a hatred for non accountability. would I? hell yes.

The footage from that rally has been seen all over the nation, and in fact, all over the world by now.
Other countries are always interested in the expressions of racism in our nation.
Would you be surprised if someone you work with held you accountable, if you did attend and participate in a hate rally shown on everyone's TVs?
 
they are not a protected class......you can fire someone for being a Nazi......for being a lib'rul......for being a conservative......for eating pepper on their ice cream........
 
Great. I do agree with this to the extent that if the customers or clients of any business are subjected to any form of bigotry or racism by an employee, it would be grounds for firing. But what are you going to do when the KKK puts their hoods back on? Will you make it illegal for them to wear them? What about the alt-left? Is it going to be okay for them to wear their black hoodies while they assault counter-protestors with bicycle locks? Antifa was in Charlottesville too, ya know.

Bicycle lock assault would be too kind against an alt white hate monger. The "alt left" should hide their faces out of shame for not being more aggressive toward those swine.
 
The footage from that rally has been seen all over the nation, and in fact, all over the world by now.
Other countries are always interested in the expressions of racism in our nation.
Would you be surprised if someone you work with held you accountable, if you did attend and participate in a hate rally shown on everyone's TVs?

what does any of that have to do with what we've been discussing? I get it, you abhor racism and racist people. I rail against it as well, but if someone separates that shit from their work life in such a way that it doesn't affect their job...........what's the issue?
 
Those accessories were probably worn for protection against pepper spray and tear gas and not for anonymity .

No one would get fired for protesting against racism.

You can get a gas mask online for around $20 that will work a thousand times better than sunglasses, bandanas, and hoodies .... and it doesn't hide your face until you need it. :palm: (Your arguments are always so ridiculous). According to you, the White Supremacists are NOT hiding their faces, wearing NO "protection". :palm: I guess they were not prepared for violent Hate Whitey socialists to show up in such massive numbers.

Protesting is legal :palm:
 
they are not a protected class......you can fire someone for being a Nazi......for being a lib'rul......for being a conservative......for eating pepper on their ice cream........

I once did not hire a guy because he insisted on bringing up how he hated the idea of Obamacare, during his job interview.
All I had to say was I found a better candidate for the job. Which I did.
The people I fired were written up and it was explicitly noted in my report that, the reason for their termination was that they expressed racist ideas and attitudes to me about guests and other employees.
There is a difference, Pimp.
 
Being a White Supremacist Grounds for Firing

After white nationalists descended upon Charlottesville, Virginia, a Twitter account with the handle @YesYoureRacist began soliciting the identities of rally goers based on photographs. “If you recognize any of the Nazis marching in #Charlottesville, send me their names/profiles and I'll make them famous,” the account tweeted. And by famous, the user of course meant infamous.

The strategy of exposing the faces of rally attendees to hundreds of thousands of people on Twitter worked, and many were identified. By Sunday, one of those whose name and place of residence had been revealed had reportedly been fired from his job at Top Dog, hot dog restaurant in Berkeley, California, according to Berkleyside. (A call to Top Dog went unanswered.)

The strategy that ultimately got Cole White, the man who lost his job after being identified via social media, fired directed a mix of public shaming and economic pressure not at him, per se, but toward his employer. It took only a few hours for internet users to come up with an identification, where he was from, and where he worked and then to start calling on Top Dog to let him go. That’s certainly not a brand new tactic, but it’s a variety of vigilantism to which social media is particularly well suited, finding and disseminating information and amplifying calls to action far beyond what would be possible within a single geographic community. After the news broke that White had been fired, many who had participated tweeted delighted responses. ”Awesome! We must shame them into oblivion,” wrote one user.

It's not merely that Cole White lost his job. The website GoDaddy has bounced the neo-Nazi website Daily Stormer off its servers, and the University of Nevada, Reno, has released a statement condemning racism and white supremacy after it became clear that one of its students had participated in the rally. All of these cases indicate that there is real pushback against the trend that my colleague Matt Thompson described over the weekend: that white supremacists feel increasingly comfortable expressing their views in public fora. This is certainly true, but apparently they can't do so with impunity: The hoods may be off, but the torchbearers may not have jobs to come back to on Monday. The efforts to push employers to fire the offending employees are an example of how the public—but, importantly, not the government—can strengthen the norms against these ideas, attach a stigma to them, and try to move society away from them.

Of course, the consequence of this dynamic is that taboo political ideas of all stripes can lead to workplace sanctions. While many on the political left are now lauding firings as a way to hold white supremacists accountable, it’s also worth remembering that pressuring employers to sever ties based on political activities, or social and racial beliefs, has historically been targeted in the other direction. McCarthyism involved reporting Communists and Communist sympathizers and pushing them out of the workforce, and Hollywood in particular. And as Walter Greason, a historian and professor at Monmouth University said in an interview, “Historically it's more dangerous as an employee to be associated with racial justice and the NAACP, than it was to be affiliated with the KKK.”

More recently, the dynamics have shifted somewhat with the advent of the internet. Perhaps most memorably, there’s the incident of a public-relations professional who made a racist joke about AIDS while boarding a flight to South Africa. While in the air, the tweet went viral, leading outraged internet users to not just ridicule her, but to direct attention at her employer as well. Countless onlookers waited for her to land and learn of her dismissal. While the offense at the root of these firings is different, the viral and Google-able nature of the internet means that the consequences of such terminations are long-lasting: Not only does a person lose his or her job, but the entire incident will forever be tied to their name for all to see.

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/08/charlottesville-employment/536838/

Before I retired I personally fired people and wrote in their report that they were fired for being racists.
I have no problem with this.
No employer should.

If you did that in this country you would be taken to an industrial tribunal and likely sacked. It is against the law to put personal details like that in a reference and rightly so.
 
what does any of that have to do with what we've been discussing? I get it, you abhor racism and racist people. I rail against it as well, but if someone separates that shit from their work life in such a way that it doesn't affect their job...........what's the issue?

They expect that there will be no consequences for their public display of hatred because one of their own sits in the white house.
 
The footage from that rally has been seen all over the nation, and in fact, all over the world by now.
Other countries are always interested in the expressions of racism in our nation.
Would you be surprised if someone you work with held you accountable, if you did attend and participate in a hate rally shown on everyone's TVs?
So-called anti-fascists started the violence!!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/19685...olence-antifa-charlottesville-robert-kraychik
 
If you did that in this country you would be taken to an industrial tribunal and likely sacked. It is against the law to put personal details like that in a reference and rightly so.

People like Buckley who revel in ABUSING their POWER ... are why we limit the power of gov't officials.

:clink:
 
Bicycle lock assault would be too kind against an alt white hate monger. The "alt left" should hide their faces out of shame for not being more aggressive toward those swine.
So it would seem that you want violence to occur, but I very much doubt if you'd get off your arse and do it yourself!
 
Back
Top