Average tax refund down 17 percent, IRS reports

Wow, liberals are just fucking retards. This topic just proves it. They are complaining that people weren't able to loan their money to the government interest free. It's like these people really don't get it. They must think your tax return is some extra money the government gives you. LOL it's not even worth debating people who don't even understand what they're debating
 
I did not get a tax refund, I had to pay?!! Take that Trump/GOP tax cuts shove it up your ass Secretary Steven Mnuchin!

VaultAIS21.jpg
 
How is this "economics"?

The economics of this are that GDP growth is going to be negatively affected because of smaller refunds this year, even after your guy promised that wouldn't happen.

So it seems all you people do is make promises that you have no intention of fulfilling, in order to trick people.
Hey John Forbes Nash, what would happen if you reduced your withholding to the point where you neither owed the government or received a refund in April, then you took the money (the difference in your take home pay before and after the withholding change)in your suddenly larger paychecks, and just deposited it in some interest bearing account or a short term investment until next April? Do the fucking math, would you have the same amount of cash, at the same time of year, if you let the government give you BACK YOUR OWN MONEY, OR IF YOU USE SOME COMMON SENSE AND DO IT MY WAY!?
 
I did not get a tax refund, I had to pay?!! Take that Trump/GOP tax cuts shove it up your ass Secretary Steven Mnuchin!

VaultAIS21.jpg

Wow! You accidentally did a smart thing! Now take a remedial math class and calculate your withholding so you don’t have to pay anything next year, and you don’t get a refund either! Yeah, I know, it’s fiscally conservative! But it can be our little secret!
 
Hey John Forbes Nash, what would happen if you reduced your withholding to the point where you neither owed the government or received a refund in April, then you took the money (the difference in your take home pay before and after the withholding change)in your suddenly larger paychecks, and just deposited it in some interest bearing account or a short term investment until next April? Do the fucking math, would you have the same amount of cash, at the same time of year, if you let the government give you BACK YOUR OWN MONEY, OR IF YOU USE SOME COMMON SENSE AND DO IT MY WAY!?

The point is that Trump and the GOP promised there wouldn't be changes to refunds.

So all this is just an excuse for bad policy.
 
The point is that Trump and the GOP promised there wouldn't be changes to refunds.

So all this is just an excuse for bad policy.
No, the point is the title of this thread that YOU started, "Average tax refund down 17 percent, IRS reports". The only promise the GOP made was that taxes would go down for the majority of taxpayers. Paul Ryan said that withholding would decrease also. Both promises were kept. If the government changes it's withholding policy(which it did), then logic dictates the stupid "refund" amount is going to change, i.e., it's gonna get bigger or smaller than it was before the change. The IRS would much rather cut a check for your simple ass than chase me down to get a check out of me. They like you right where you are, a mushroom in the dark being fed bullshit. But I figured you for one of those "I love to pay taxes" kind of guys! Was I wrong? Why do you want the SALT and mortgage deductions reinstated? Do you understand that without these deductions, you are handing over even MORE of your hard earned money to the government? But if this is all about the refund, here is something else you can do: Do a new W-4, increasing your personal withholding by 17%, your paychecks will go down, but your precious refund should be back up where it was before the russian tax cut
 
No, the point is the title of this thread that YOU started, "Average tax refund down 17 percent, IRS reports". The only promise the GOP made was that taxes would go down for the majority of taxpayers. Paul Ryan said that withholding would decrease also. Both promises were kept. If the government changes it's withholding policy(which it did), then logic dictates the stupid "refund" amount is going to change, i.e., it's gonna get bigger or smaller than it was before the change. The IRS would much rather cut a check for your simple ass than chase me down to get a check out of me. They like you right where you are, a mushroom in the dark being fed bullshit. But I figured you for one of those "I love to pay taxes" kind of guys! Was I wrong? Why do you want the SALT and mortgage deductions reinstated? Do you understand that without these deductions, you are handing over even MORE of your hard earned money to the government? But if this is all about the refund, here is something else you can do: Do a new W-4, increasing your personal withholding by 17%, your paychecks will go down, but your precious refund should be back up where it was before the russian tax cut

No, the promise was that wages would grow by $4K-$9k.

The promise was that the market would grow.

The promise was that you could do your taxes on a post card.

The promise was that revenues would grow.

The promise was that there wouldn't be any more outsourcing and offshoring.

The promise was that refunds wouldn't be affected.

The promise was that it wouldn't be stock buybacks.

You're now moving the bar on what you promise because all your other promises were shit. Since they were all shit, why would any new promise have merit?
 
The only promise the GOP made was that taxes would go down for the majority of taxpayers.

Wrong.

Literally the first bullet point of a WH press release from October 2017 was this:

The average American household income could increase between $4,000 and $9,000 a year in wages and salary alone by cutting the Federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent, according to an analysis by the Council of Economic Advisors (CEA).
 
No, the promise was that wages would grow by $4K-$9k.

The promise was that the market would grow.

The promise was that you could do your taxes on a post card.

The promise was that revenues would grow.

The promise was that there wouldn't be any more outsourcing and offshoring.

The promise was that refunds wouldn't be affected.

The promise was that it wouldn't be stock buybacks.

You're now moving the bar on what you promise because all your other promises were shit. Since they were all shit, why would any new promise have merit?

Now all I need from you is a link to somewhere(preferably a video)showing Trump actually promising every one of those points. Pay close attention to the wording on each of the points though, that has bitten you in the ass before. You have to ask yourself if he is stating a possible outcome, explaining a concept, or actually making a promise. I’m counting on you, because the only thing I ever heard from him was lower brackets, doubled personal deduction, higher child tax credit(doesn’t affect me), and elimination of SALT and other exemptions(again, none of which have any effect on me). And I don’t even think of those things as promises, he was explaining what he wanted to do, and for me he nailed it
 
Average tax refund down 17 percent, IRS reports
...
Last year, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin predicted “there won’t be a change” in the share of people receiving refunds.
...
Unveiling new withholding tables last year, to account for the new law, Mnuchin called accusations by Democrats that the administration would drive down refunds “ridiculous.”
https://www.politico.com/story/2019...CXzpSxcZXbPNvIdksR-_vLj6TEHCigeFqFU-UVSrnP_II

Revenues are also down 2% from 2017.

So the Russia Tax Cut didn't deliver on its promises.

According to this, revenues are coming in slightly higher, overall, at 0.5% above 2017:

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-tax-cuts-federal-revenues-deficits/

However, since the GDP grew in nominal terms by about 5.5% in that time, we'd have expected revenues to grow by 5.5% just as a "par for the course" figure. And, to keep pace with population growth and inflation, you need well above 0.5% revenue growth per year (more like 3%), just to maintain the same level of real per capita government services without driving up deficits.
 
According to this, revenues are coming in slightly higher, overall, at 0.5% above 2017:

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/trump-tax-cuts-federal-revenues-deficits/

However, since the GDP grew in nominal terms by about 5.5% in that time, we'd have expected revenues to grow by 5.5% just as a "par for the course" figure. And, to keep pace with population growth and inflation, you need well above 0.5% revenue growth per year (more like 3%), just to maintain the same level of real per capita government services without driving up deficits.

Actual Treasury Statements show 2018 was 2% ($63B) below 2017. I mean, we can all do math, right?

Receipts
Jan-2017: $344,069
Feb-2017: $171,713
Mar-2017: $216,584
Apr-2017: $455,605
May-2017: $240,418
Jun-2017: $388,660
Jul-2017: $232,040
Aug-2017: $226,311
Sep-2017: $348,722
Oct-2017: $235,341
Nov-2017: $208,374
Dec-2017: $325,797
Total-2017: $3,393,634

Receipts
Jan-2018: $361,038
Feb-2018: $155,623
Mar-2018: $210,832
Apr-2018: $510,447
May-2018: $217,075
Jun-2018: $316,278
Jul-2018: $225,266
Aug-2018: $219,115
Sep-2018: $343,559
Oct-2018: $252,692
Nov-2018: $205,961
Dec-2018: $312,584
Total-2018: $3,330,470

-$63B (-2%) 2018 vs. 2017.

You can't argue math, right?
 
The promise was that refunds wouldn't be affected.

Average tax refund down 17 percent, IRS reports
...
Last year, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin predicted “there won’t be a change” in the share of people receiving refunds.
...
Unveiling new withholding tables last year, to account for the new law, Mnuchin called accusations by Democrats that the administration would drive down refunds “ridiculous.”
https://www.politico.com/story/2019...CXzpSxcZXbPNvIdksR-_vLj6TEHCigeFqFU-UVSrnP_II
 
I just did that for the $4K-$9K wage increase you all promised in my previous post.

The average American household income could increase between $4,000 and $9,000 a year in wages and salary alone by cutting the Federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent, according to an analysis by the Council of Economic Advisors (CEA).

You mean this? Does the word "promise" appear anywhere? As far as a projection or prediction goes, do you not concede that someone with a doubled personal deduction, enough children qualifying for the increased tax credits, living in a low or non taxing state, could possibly see their annual income increase by $4-9K?
 
Actual Treasury Statements show 2018 was 2% ($63B) below 2017. I mean, we can all do math, right?

Receipts
Jan-2017: $344,069
Feb-2017: $171,713
Mar-2017: $216,584
Apr-2017: $455,605
May-2017: $240,418
Jun-2017: $388,660
Jul-2017: $232,040
Aug-2017: $226,311
Sep-2017: $348,722
Oct-2017: $235,341
Nov-2017: $208,374
Dec-2017: $325,797
Total-2017: $3,393,634

Receipts
Jan-2018: $361,038
Feb-2018: $155,623
Mar-2018: $210,832
Apr-2018: $510,447
May-2018: $217,075
Jun-2018: $316,278
Jul-2018: $225,266
Aug-2018: $219,115
Sep-2018: $343,559
Oct-2018: $252,692
Nov-2018: $205,961
Dec-2018: $312,584
Total-2018: $3,330,470

-$63B (-2%) 2018 vs. 2017.

You can't argue math, right?

The article I used might have been using fiscal years instead of calendar years. Now that I think of it, calendar years are more appropriate here, since that's the relevant time block for a tax change.
 
Back
Top