Attacking Hyde

Does progeny work better for you?

At every stage of the childs development, we call it that. But for you that would force death upon this child, you run and pretend that suddenly it isn't a child if you decide to kill it.

When a woman becomes pregnant, does she say 'I am going to have a fetus!' ???

Ever heard the expression 'with child'???

Yeah but it's not a child, you reject from a retard factory. It's a fucking egg. after 9 months of successful gestation and a successful birth it becomes a child.
 
See what I mean, you completely ignore the science. Genetics completely proves you wrong. Yet your emotional response won't let you accept that fact.



Seriously, the above even a third grader could knock down. Yes, our DNA is in encoded in our cells. But every cell is not equal. A fertilized egg cell has the complete genetic mapping and if it implants will continue to grow and develop until the child is ready to be born. Then that same child will continue to grow and develop after birth.

Screaming 'it isn't complete' just shows how dimwitted you are on the topic.



So, again... in your fantasy world, what is it that 'completes' a child?

Saying 'it might never be born' as an excuse to justify your killing the child is not a slope you want to go down. Because I can just as easily say 'a two year old is INCOMPLETE and MIGHT not make it to three years of age'... you wouldn't advocate killing that child would you?

It's pretty simple. You call it 'killing a child'. Cant be trying to elicit a more emotional response than that.

Ok, you have no problems ignoring the rights of the mother. That little lump inside is more important than her, according to you (and the fact that you cant answer my direct questions re: her rights.)

A 2 yr old is born....unless I am mistaken? So viability is proven there, as one criteria. You can also intercede on behalf of the 2 yr old without infringing on the rights of the mother (unless she's committed a crime. Being pregnant is not a crime.)

To you, there is no distinction....it's a 'child' and you cannot take it's life, that is depriving it of the right to life. And yet.....about 99% of pro-lifers support abortion to save the life of the mother. What makes the fetus 'less' complete there so that it's right to life can be taken? How come that's ok?
 
actually, again... NO... I am basing my case on genetics. Scientific evidence states I am correct.

Arguing that you don't think the LEGAL rights should be given to an unborn child is debatable and valid. Someone arguing whether the child is 'complete' or 'human' or 'alive' is not. Those are emotional responses given to provide justification for their inability to come to terms with the science.

But you're ok destroying fertilized eggs unless they are in a women's body.

So - not science, it's emotion.
 
Back
Top