‘Art Of The Deal’ Co-Author Tony Schwartz Predicts Trump’s About To Resign

Nope, I will support his cheap healthcare for all and his infrastructure bills, if he doesn't sell them to the highest bidder. I will also support his defeating ISIS, but I don't support the bad legislation he has supported thus far.


can u even name this legislation?
 
Nope, I will support his cheap healthcare for all and his infrastructure bills, if he doesn't sell them to the highest bidder. I will also support his defeating ISIS, but I don't support the bad legislation he has supported thus far.
why use trillions of US dollars ( which we cannot afford-another stimulus but now were' at $20T debt)
when privitization an attract outside investors?

Ideally we would fund it ourselves....but w can't afford such anymore -not with an upcoming entitlement crunch also
 
North Korea's long-range ballistic missile test-fired last week is thought to have a range capable of reaching Alaska and Hawaii, but not the main US continent, missile experts said Wednesday (July 12) .

Jang Young Geun, a professor of aerospace and mechanic engineering at Korea Aerospace University, said that if fired at a range-maximising angle, the Hwasong-14 missile could fly 6,200km carrying a 900kg nuclear warhead and 8,100km with a 600kg warhead.

"If a standardised nuclear warhead (weighing 600kg) is mounted on the Hwasong-14, it can attack Alaska and Hawaii," Jang said, based on a computerised simulation.
"Although the missile has a range equivalent to an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), it is not enough to reach the US mainland."

Pyongyang is about 6,000km away from Alaska, 7,600km from Hawaii and 9,000km from San Francisco.
Get The Straits Times
newsletters in your inbox
Sign Up

In the July 4 launch, the Hwasong-14 flew about 2,800km with an apogee of 933km, according to the North. Experts initially viewed that if it was fired at a range-maximizing angle, it could have flown at least 7,000km.

John Schilling, a US expert, said the Hwasong-14 could fly up to 9,700km with a 500kg nuclear warhead, putting the US naval base in San Diego under its attack range.

But North Korea appears to be still more than a decade away from developing an ICBM capable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads, both analysts noted, highlighting that the number of nuclear tests that the communist regime has conducted is still fewer than other nuclear states that have acquired ICBM capabilities.

"While the North Korean missile program has been conducting tests at an accelerated pace, it has conducted only two nuclear tests in the past four years. So perhaps in 2030 we will see a multiple-warhead Hwasong-14, but probably not before then," Schilling said.

Jang also said that if North Korea manages to miniaturise a nuclear warhead up to 450km and fit it atop an ICBM, it could fly up to 9,000km and reach the western parts of the US mainland, such as San Francisco.

But the expert dismissed the North's claim that the Hwasong-14 survived intense heat and pressure during the re-entry phase, echoing the assessment of South Korea's spy agency that the regime has yet to master re-entry technology.

"It's uncertain whether the Hwasong-14 succeeded in re-entering the atmosphere, because they didn't provide any specific data to support the claim," Jang said. "It's also hard to believe the missile has enough accuracy to hit strategic targets."
http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/ea...ea-still-short-of-hitting-us-mainland-experts

so there is some question about max range
 
yes. of course. that's it. a Trumpshrine=uncritical man love..I sell tix to the neighborhood to stop by and worship.

I advocate for his ideas which in your small mind is adoration

Let me ask you to point me to a couple of threads you personally started, in which you articulated how appalled you were by Trump's lack of character, his arrogance, his lack of intellect, and his overall boorish and uncouth behavior (which in my opinion, disqualify him from holding the office of the presidency)

Because you know what? I can only recall you, 99.99999999999 percent of the time hunkered down in Trump defense mode; providing cover for him and defending him with every fiber of your being.
 
Let me ask you to point me to a couple of threads you personally started, in which you articulated how appalled you were by Trump's lack of character, his arrogance, his lack of intellect, and his overall boorish and uncouth behavior (which in my opinion, disqualify him from holding the office of the presidency)

Because you know what? I can only recall you, 99.99999999999 percent of the time hunkered down in Trump defense mode; providing cover for him and defending him with every fiber of your being.
I advocate for Trump's ideas. Why would I start threads otherwise when we have fake news and you guys and #nevertrumps to do that all day long??

It's not FUN defending his ideas with his shitty rhetoric, but advancing his agenda is more important then bashing his rhetoric.

Like I've said over and over I support his agenda,and that means having to support him since the chattering pundit class only cares about rhetoric.. jeese. how many different ways do i gotta say the same thing?
 
I advocate for Trump's ideas. Why would I start threads otherwise when we have fake news and you guys and #nevertrumps to do that all day long??

It's not FUN defending his ideas with his shitty rhetoric, but advancing his agenda is more important then bashing his rhetoric.

Like I've said over and over I support his agenda,and that means having to support him since the chattering pundit class only cares about rhetoric.. jeese. how many different ways do i gotta say the same thing?

Long story short.... you advocate for Trump because they pay you 10¢ a post.
 
I advocate for Trump's ideas. Why would I start threads otherwise when we have fake news and you guys and #nevertrumps to do that all day long??

It's not FUN defending his ideas with his shitty rhetoric, but advancing his agenda is more important then bashing his rhetoric.

Like I've said over and over I support his agenda,and that means having to support him since the chattering pundit class only cares about rhetoric.. jeese. how many different ways do i gotta say the same thing?
No one believes you, doesn't matter how many ways you say it.
 
I advocate for Trump's ideas. Why would I start threads otherwise when we have fake news and you guys and #nevertrumps to do that all day long??

It's not FUN defending his ideas with his shitty rhetoric, but advancing his agenda is more important then bashing his rhetoric.

Like I've said over and over I support his agenda,and that means having to support him since the chattering pundit class only cares about rhetoric.. jeese. how many different ways do i gotta say the same thing?

He asked for links etc in support of it, can you provide a few??
 
I advocate for Trump's ideas. Why would I start threads otherwise when we have fake news and you guys and #nevertrumps to do that all day long??

It's not FUN defending his ideas with his shitty rhetoric, but advancing his agenda is more important then bashing his rhetoric.

Like I've said over and over I support his agenda,and that means having to support him since the chattering pundit class only cares about rhetoric.. jeese. how many different ways do i gotta say the same thing?

So you admit to defending Trump the terrible human being, Trump the arrogant pussy grabber, Trump the sexist, Trump the undisciplined, blustering blowhard.
 
So you admit to defending Trump the terrible human being, Trump the arrogant pussy grabber, Trump the sexist, Trump the undisciplined, blustering blowhard.
O.M.F.gawd..
I take the time to address your concern and explain my modus operandi.
i SPECIFICALLY say "I support his ideas"

Then you underline and bold it and say i admit to defending Trump?? blah blah blah


what's wrong with you ? :palm:
 
He asked for links etc in support of it, can you provide a few??
read again what he wants. Me starting threads critical of Trump.
I explained there are no shortages of fake news /chattering pundits/#neverTrump /Dems that do this constantly.

Why would I add to that? I advocate for his ideas!
 
At least I'm not in a mass hysteria bubble....

Neither am I.

What's your point, other than desperately trying to deflect from the very real possibility that your hero might get proven to be a traitor and a criminal?

And funny isn't it, how you never described your side's 8 years of mass Obama hysteria as a mass hysteria bubble.

Imagine that.
 
Neither am I.

What's your point, other than desperately trying to deflect from the very real possibility that your hero might get proven to be a traitor and a criminal?

And funny isn't it, how you never described your side's 8 years of mass Obama hysteria as a mass hysteria bubble.

Imagine that.

How many people rioted in the streets in 2008? In 2012?

How many people had tantrums and screamed that McCain or Romney lost because of an imaginary Russian boogeyman?

Think about how insane this all has looked to the country. The libs have jumped the shark.
 
read again what he wants. Me starting threads critical of Trump.
I explained there are no shortages of fake news /chattering pundits/#neverTrump /Dems that do this constantly.

Why would I add to that? I advocate for his ideas!

Who are you?? I never asked you anything.......... Are you anatta??
 
Back
Top