‘Art Of The Deal’ Co-Author Tony Schwartz Predicts Trump’s About To Resign

Sure, just like you know more about politics then I do .. which of course is why you voted for and supported with your entire being the worst fucking president this nation has EVER seen. :0)

I've never had a conversation with you about the range of ICBM's .. which Kim still has in place.

The moment we strike NK, Kim will send his missiles into South Korea .. killing countless innocent people.

Smarter people know that Kim has nukes for his own protection and he's not dumb enough to start a war .. or fire missiles towards Guam .. which you were naïve enough to believe he would do. He's never done that.

These aren't insults, they are statements of fact.

Fortune: You Don’t Want to Know What’ll Happen If the U.S. Strikes North Korea First


I'm picking apart your 'wargaming' .. that's fair, right?

so what was this little ditty all about?

Again, you demonstrate your ignorance of the situation.

Ask yourself this .. has NK ever launched missiles near Guam?

"Even though North Korea has conducted 80 missile tests under Mr. Kim, it has never launched a missile toward a target as far as Guam and has never disclosed such precise flight data in advance.

When it tested an intercontinental ballistic missile on July 28, the missile followed a steep trajectory so that it reached roughly 2,300 miles into space but covered only 998 horizontal miles, falling near the northernmost Japanese island, Hokkaido."

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/10/world/asia/north-korea-guam-missiles-kim-trump.html?mcubz=0

ONLY really dumb ass people believe that bullshit. Why put YOURSELF in that category?

why would you bring this up if not to show the (supposed) range of NK's ICBM's ??
Or did you just pull this out of your ass just for fun? There is no other reason to post it unless you are posting about NK's range/ability to hit Guam and surrounding waters

To your link> It's well established that NK would respond to an attack with missiles.
what happens if you take out the computer sequences to launch them?
There goes that whole link's reliance on missiles

How do you take out launching sequences?
EMF pulse/conventional weapons, and maybe hitting the missiles themselves
( and you link goes on about a nuclear attack -i'm talking about a STEALTH attack with advanced EMF/LASAR as well as conventional)

where does that leave you?
Artillery and the army are the main threats.
Conventional analysis sez they are too dug in to take them all out - but what if you concentrate
and allow a certain amount to fire but take them out quickly? bear in mind "shock and awe" would now be a factor because of STEALTH first strike

where does that leave you?
with an army with no firepower with older weapons up against the most powerful and advanced weapons in the world.

where does that leave the generals?
probably in a severe doubt as to committing their army without strategic backing.
It would be chewed up by S.Korean/US forces.
++

I am not saying this is likely. I am saying you can be sure scenarios like these are already on the shelf

Oh look ! here's one.
You should learn that the art of war is to always look for the possible, even when it's an unthinkable

The last resort: How a US strike on North Korea could play out
Countering North Korea's relatively formidable surface-to-air missile defense capabilities, stealth American F-22s, F-35s and B-2 bombers would likely lead a joint air campaign with the help of Japanese and South Korean F-15 or F-16 fighters, he said.
Unmanned aircraft could also be used to limit risk to pilots.

he US would likely move additional aircraft to the region in the event of an imminent strike, but also maintains two major air bases in South Korea -- Osan with F-16 fighters and A-10 "tank killers," and Kunsan with F-16s.
Heavy airpower can be called in from the Pacific island of Guam, through which the US rotates B-1, B-2 and B-52 bombers.

As US and allied aircraft take out priority targets from the sky, American warships would launch a barrage of Tomahawk missiles concentrated on North Korean missile sites, air defense systems and response corridors capable of launching a retaliatory nuclear weapon.
The US Navy has 10 guided-missile cruisers and destroyers based in Japan. The ships are armed with Tomahawk missiles for offensive purposes and the Aegis missile defense system that could be used to intercept North Korean launches.

The US could use cyber attacks to disrupt Pyongyang's weapons programs -- though experts say that would only delay, rather than stop them.
Urgent efforts to take out priority targets like air defense systems, retaliatory missile launch sites and service facilities -- coupled with assumptions that the US-led offensive would be met with heavy resistance -- are likely to take a toll on the US' inventory of bombs and missiles.

"What is the plan to resupply?" he said.
The US would need to ensure it had enough bombs, missiles and electronic warfare planes to destroy or disable North Korea's air defenses before deploying its heavy bombers, likely B-1s stationed in Guam, needed to strike North Korea's fortified nuclear weapons sites, according to Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/11/politics/us-north-korea-strike-first/index.html

now of course they will strike back- but if they won't listen to Kim then maybe they wont use their army
knowing it will get chewed up.
THE SAME FOR CHINA -why would it get into a war that is quickly slipping away from any chance of defeating the US/SK

By no means is this all that would happen-
but if lil Kim has ICBM's that can survive re-entry and miniaturization;what are the US options?
First strike has to be on the table as horrid as that first appears.

Always think in the realm of the possible when it comes to war- your enemy is doing the same
 
Prove that the top picture is what it claims to be.

I don't base my opinions on stupid mindless memes.

That's a right-wing thing.

And re: the Democrats' mostly peaceful demonstrations, that is part of the history of this country.

At least they weren't carrying Walmart lawn torches and giving Nazi salutes like your people do.

Oh, you want everyone to forget about that.

Got it.

Ain't happening though.

There were no riots when Obama was elected, either time. Zero. Zip. None. The bed wetter leftists rioted for weeks after Trump and have gone completely insane to date.

Last weekend, the KKK marched to protest the removal of statues, not the election of our President. Your terrorists BLM and Antifa showed up and the police stood down.

No comparison. I don't know how you're not embarrassed to defend this stupid shit.
 
There were no riots when Obama was elected, either time. Zero. Zip. None. The bed wetter leftists rioted for weeks after Trump and have gone completely insane to date.

Last weekend, the KKK marched to protest the removal of statues, not the election of our President. Your terrorists BLM and Antifa showed up and the police stood down.

No comparison. I don't know how you're not embarrassed to defend this stupid shit.

So you think a bunch of neo-Nazis carrying torches in a march that was supposed to mimic pro Nazi marches of the 1930's is somehow not as bad as anti-trump people excersizing their 1st amendment rights?

Your drooling, goofball lunatic gun-sucker thugs made a run on the nation's gun and ammo supply while forming underground, anti-gubmint paramilitary militia groups running around in the woods practicing for the race war they were planning.

All your current drama queen nonsense is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt at diverting attention away from your own embarrassment.

Don't even try to pull that amateurish crap with me.
 
There were no riots when Obama was elected, either time. Zero. Zip. None. The bed wetter leftists rioted for weeks after Trump and have gone completely insane to date.

Last weekend, the KKK marched to protest the removal of statues, not the election of our President. Your terrorists BLM and Antifa showed up and the police stood down.

No comparison. I don't know how you're not embarrassed to defend this stupid shit.
show biz kidz makin movies of themselves
you know they don't give a fuck about anybody else
 
So you think a bunch of neo-Nazis carrying torches in a march that was supposed to mimic pro Nazi marches of the 1930's is somehow not as bad as anti-trump people excersizing their 1st amendment rights?

Most definitely.

Setting fires and destroying property is not a 1st Amendment right.

civil-war-LAPD-trump-win-678x381.jpg
 
Most definitely.

Setting fires and destroying property is not a 1st Amendment right.

Your random bullshit riot picture is nothing more than that.

A random bullshit riot picture that has nothing to do with the election.

Anything to defend your Nazi heroes.
 
Your random bullshit riot picture is nothing more than that.

A random bullshit riot picture that has nothing to do with the election.

Anything to defend your Nazi heroes.

Sure it does. Can't sweep all that under the rug now. There were riots every night after Trump won. The bed wetting crybabies didn't get their way. Stupid enough to think their violent little tantrums would make any difference.

Guess they found out. lol
 
Your random bullshit riot picture is nothing more than that.

A random bullshit riot picture that has nothing to do with the election.

Anything to defend your Nazi heroes.

A reporter with Richmond, Virginia CBS affiliate WTVR-TV was attacked by protesters with an Antifa march after he refused their demands to stop filming.

 
Sure it does. Can't sweep all that under the rug now. There were riots every night after Trump won. The bed wetting crybabies didn't get their way. Stupid enough to think their violent little tantrums would make any difference.

Guess they found out. lol

Prove that the picture with the fires burning is from an anti-Trump demonstration.

Oh, you can't, can you?

Why?

Because it isn't what you claim it to be.

Typical.
 
lol

u think neo nazis chant were here were queer?

want 2 try again?

lol

u think a couple of gay guys would sucker punch a photographer for doing his job?

u think the guys who committed the assault were part of the marchers or were chanting with them?

want 2 try again?
 
lol

u think a couple of gay guys would sucker punch a photographer for doing his job?

u think the guys who committed the assault were part of the marchers or were chanting with them?

want 2 try again?


watch the video

its not very long (bcuz antifa knocked the camera down) they are chanting were here were gay we fight the kkk while holding a huge banner that says against white supremacy

u sure u want to claim it was nazis?

on top of that heres the cbs news report

antifa admits they did it but say they were justified becuz the cameraman did not obey them


A WTVR CBS 6 journalist was assaulted by a protester in Richmond Sunday night.

The journalist, who was not on the clock but was recording video for the newscast on his phone, recorded video of a large crowd of Monument Avenue protesters passing by The Camel, a live music venue, on West Broad Street.

“Stop filming bro,” one protester yelled.

“I can film whatever I want,” the CBS 6 staffer replied in the video. "Get out of my face."

The employee said protesters then put the flags in his face to block his camera view and intimidate him.

"When this man ran up he was told people did not want to be filmed. He proceeded to film anyways. He was then told AGAIN that he was not to film people's faces. He proceeded anyways," a post on the Antifa Seven Hills Facebook page describing the situation read.

Police officers responded and the journalist was transported via ambulance to the hospital, where he received four staples in his scalp. He was later released from the hospital.

"This is not a peaceful protest," he wrote.

http://wtvr.com/2017/08/14/cbs-6-journalist-attack-richmond-protest/
 
watch the video

its not very long (bcuz antifa knocked the camera down) they are chanting were here were gay we fight the kkk while holding a huge banner that says against white supremacy

u sure u want to claim it was nazis?

on top of that heres the cbs news report

antifa admits they did it but say they were justified becuz the cameraman did not obey them


A WTVR CBS 6 journalist was assaulted by a protester in Richmond Sunday night.

The journalist, who was not on the clock but was recording video for the newscast on his phone, recorded video of a large crowd of Monument Avenue protesters passing by The Camel, a live music venue, on West Broad Street.

“Stop filming bro,” one protester yelled.

“I can film whatever I want,” the CBS 6 staffer replied in the video. "Get out of my face."

The employee said protesters then put the flags in his face to block his camera view and intimidate him.

"When this man ran up he was told people did not want to be filmed. He proceeded to film anyways. He was then told AGAIN that he was not to film people's faces. He proceeded anyways," a post on the Antifa Seven Hills Facebook page describing the situation read.

Police officers responded and the journalist was transported via ambulance to the hospital, where he received four staples in his scalp. He was later released from the hospital.

"This is not a peaceful protest," he wrote.

I watched the video. The guys who hit the photographer were not marching or chanting.

They were right-wing neo-Nazi Trumptard agitators just like I said.

Oldest trick in the book.
 
I watched the video. The guys who hit the photographer were not marching or chanting.

They were right-wing neo-Nazi Trumptard agitators just like I said.

Oldest trick in the book.


lol, and then they hijacked the antifa facebook page and posted a confession & attempted to justify their assault, huh?

protesters then put the flags in his face to block his camera view and intimidate him.

"When this man ran up he was told people did not want to be filmed. He proceeded to film anyways. He was then told AGAIN that he was not to film people's faces. He proceeded anyways," a post on the Antifa Seven Hills Facebook page describing the situation read.

Additionally, a marked WTVR CBS 6 crew on the scene captured video of one protester who was concealing a baseball bat.

Police tweeted just after 10:20 p.m. that the protest was underway on West Broad Street and Laurel.

Demonstrators marched westbound, blocked roads before eventually surrounding the state to Confederate J.E.B. Stuart on the city's historic Monument Avenue.

Police tweeted at 12:30 a.m. that the demonstrators had returned to Abner Clay park where they dispersed.

The protesters took to the streets chanting demands to tear down Confederate monuments.

http://wtvr.com/2017/08/14/cbs-6-journalist-attack-richmond-protest/

yea nazis were chanting demands to tear down Confederate monuments its the oldest trick in the book

:rofl2:
 
Back
Top