Are we better off with a discredited FBI?

every time I read your posts I feel dumber, like how can there be stupid in every one of your thoughts.

Are we better off, or less safe with the left beating on our President for 14 months now?
Interesting how your glasses are fogged on one side

It seems to have surprised Trump and some of his supporters, but the office of President comes with daily criticism. It has always been that way. The reasons for those criticisms vary, but with Trump, it is largely because he is extremely dishonest, reckless and somewhat incompetent.

You should feel more intelligent when you read my posts, because they generally do not come from a partisan perspective. I would think they would be a breath of fresh air for anyone who is too immersed in the propaganda from either side.
 
It seems to have surprised Trump and some of his supporters, but the office of President comes with daily criticism. It has always been that way.

but that's not what you said and what I was responding to, your reference was to making us less safe by calling the FBI out on obvious bias, toward a political candidate to the highest office in the land.
Not only would I argue the exact opposite, that we need to hold them accountable,
but

I simply pointed out the hypocrisy in you not seeing the danger on beating up our president day after day, with ridiculous claims he colluded with the Russians. That is very dangerous, especially without one shred of evidence to support it.
 
but that's not what you said and what I was responding to, your reference was to making us less safe by calling the FBI out on obvious bias, toward a political candidate to the highest office in the land.
Not only would I argue the exact opposite, that we need to hold them accountable,
but

I simply pointed out the hypocrisy in you not seeing the danger on beating up our president day after day, with ridiculous claims he colluded with the Russians. That is very dangerous, especially without one shred of evidence to support it.

They’re waiting on Mueller to provide the collusion evidence lol.

In the meantime, they’ll consider the evidence a forgone collusion and continue to undermine the president with their Russian collusion conspiracy theory.
 
I wonder if the Jews, the Poles, and the German citizens ever thought....."I wonder if we would be better off without the Gestapo and the SS....?" Personally I prefer the 4th amendment to a left wing "secret court" that determines if its OKIE DOKIE to spy on their political enemies, regardless of constitutional rights.

There is one question that could clear up this entire Russian Investigation thingy by the left. Can anyone on the left describe the CRIME that the special (wink, win) council courts are investigating? Anyone? Nope....its all crickets in the background..why? The left has defined no specific crime they are investigating....they are fishing and attempting to use the process of investigation to bait people into crimes resulting from the process. Can anyone say, CIRCULAR JUSTICE?
 
Last edited:
Oh, the quackery...and not on my part.

Don't be frantic when you post...you look silly. Also, you should avoid variations on "I know what you are, but what am I." Those kinds of posts make you look even more childish than your posts regularly do.

No frantic posting, on my part; but it does appear that you've returned to projecting your own behavior onto others actions.

So sad. :palm:
 
No frantic posting, on my part; but it does appear that you've returned to projecting your own behavior onto others actions.

So sad. :palm:

The moment you began the "I know what you are, but what am I"...you started being frantic...whether you can see it and acknowledge it or not.

It you want to feel "sad" about something...choose that!
 
Trump had no trouble with the FBI until it started checking on him. Then it became corrupt, since doing something that shows he is a crook, is the definition of corrupt. Trump will destroy the fBI to stop its checking on him. He will destroy the justice department to cover his deeds up. Trumps obstruction is obvious. But he will do anything, even acts that harm the country for the long future, to save his own ass. We vare in uncharted waters and Trump is aiming at a reef.
 
The moment you began the "I know what you are, but what am I"...you started being frantic...whether you can see it and acknowledge it or not.

It you want to feel "sad" about something...choose that!

But I didn't begin a "I know you are, but what am I" moment, so you've just added another fail to your ineffective arsenal.

So sad.
 
But I didn't begin a "I know you are, but what am I" moment, so you've just added another fail to your ineffective arsenal.

So sad.

Yeah...you really did. But, I guess you are not sharp enough to realize you did...or are not ethical enough to acknowledge that you did.

No problem. People who are not especially sharp or not especially ethical are allowed to be that.
 
Yeah...you really did. But, I guess you are not sharp enough to realize you did...or are not ethical enough to acknowledge that you did.

No problem. People who are not especially sharp or not especially ethical are allowed to be that.

Then show where I started it or are you just going to run away like every other time your lies are confronted. :good4u:

So sad.
 
Then show where I started it or are you just going to run away like every other time your lies are confronted. :good4u:

So sad.

I never run away...so try not being so sad.

Your #445 and #438...are excellent examples of "I know you are, but what am I."

#445
No frantic posting, on my part; but it does appear that you've returned to projecting your own behavior onto others actions.


#438

I was going to also point that out;; but I wanted to see if you picked up on it yourself, regarding your post.
 
I never run away...so try not being so sad.

Your #445 and #438...are excellent examples of "I know you are, but what am I."

#445



#438

So pointing out your behavior (#438) is now a "I know you are; but what am I moment"??
I wasn't aware that anticipating your behavior and setting a trap was anything but anticipation and a trap!!

As to #445; you seem to be overlooking your own posts, at #428 and #435. :good4u:

I once mentioned your cognitive memory loss and it appears that you've decided to prove me correct.
Thanks
 
So pointing out your behavior (#438) is now a "I know you are; but what am I moment"??
I wasn't aware that anticipating your behavior and setting a trap was anything but anticipation and a trap!!

As to #445; you seem to be overlooking your own posts, at #428 and #435. :good4u:

I once mentioned your cognitive memory loss and it appears that you've decided to prove me correct.
Thanks

I suspect you are not bright enough to "set a trap."

And yes...the childish nonsense you now want to think of as "setting a trap"...is a form of "I know you are, but what am I."

Actually, I visualize you as Pee Wee Herman sulking and pounding at the keys when you write that stuff.

It is only right that I thank you for the laughs!

So....Thanks!
 
I suspect you are not bright enough to "set a trap."

And yes...the childish nonsense you now want to think of as "setting a trap"...is a form of "I know you are, but what am I."

Actually, I visualize you as Pee Wee Herman sulking and pounding at the keys when you write that stuff.

It is only right that I thank you for the laughs!

So....Thanks!

Suspect all you want; because that way you can continue to deny. :D

I've noticed that you were unable to refute what I posted and instead just decided to continue your derailed train of thought. :good4u:
 
Suspect all you want; because that way you can continue to deny. :D

I've noticed that you were unable to refute what I posted and instead just decided to continue your derailed train of thought. :good4u:

Not sure what in hell you think I should be "refuting"...but your posts make so little sense, I am not going to bother re-reading them to try to figure it out. If you want to assert something you think I should refute...make it again. I'll try to stop laughing long enough to make a reply.
 
Not sure what in hell you think I should be "refuting"...but your posts make so little sense, I am not going to bother re-reading them to try to figure it out. If you want to assert something you think I should refute...make it again. I'll try to stop laughing long enough to make a reply.

Don't be sceeert.

I gave you the post #'s that refuted your presentation and that laughter you mention, seems a little nervous and forced. :D
 
Don't be sceeert.

I gave you the post #'s that refuted your presentation and that laughter you mention, seems a little nervous and forced. :D

You have never successfully refuted anything I have written.

I do not remember what you are delusional about...but if you want to assert something that you think I should refute...

...make it.

Or continue with this silly game playing...and stalling.

I never tire!
 
Back
Top