Almost all the procedural rights (amendments 4-8) originally restricting the federal government have since been made applicable to the states. The purpose of these was to produce a fair trial.
Are conditions on pretrial release unconstitutional?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Almost all the procedural rights (amendments 4-8) originally restricting the federal government have since been made applicable to the states. The purpose of these was to produce a fair trial.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
no they haven't.
None of the Bill of Rights originally restricted the states. It limited the power of federal government only. Starting in 1925 most but not all of those rights were extended to the states through the incorporation process on a case by case basis. The latest case was in 2010 that made the 2nd Amendment applicable to states.
You've confused the Post and the Times. The NY Times rarely publishes anything that is true. The Post is straight arrow.
ROFL
I'll just hold my breath for you to post these...
The reality is the party crushed the story and had operatives put out fake claims of "Russian Disinformation" in the campaign to lie to the public.
Could that be why I posted...
Because the Constitution was written for a federation of 13 sovereign states?
True, although the Bill of Rights (written after the Constitution) did not restrict those 13 states.
Paranoid conspiracy theories from MAGA and Q-ANON for Trump supporters.
Hunter Biden stories: 19.4 million
Do you really think gaslighting on such a well exposed abuse will work? Really?
{More than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly belonging to Joe Biden’s son “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”}
Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say - POLITICO
You and your Reich tried to lie this all away - you got busted.
Conspiracy theories? Like RUSHING COALUSHUN?
You just keep lying even after being fully exposed.
Most of them lying that it was Russian disinformation.
The Voice of the Reich lying:
What We Know and Don’t About Hunter Biden and a Laptop - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Amazon.Com Post openly lying:
Biden relies on pattern of activity to blame Russia for release of data from what is said to be his son’s laptop - The Washington Post
NBC lied
ABC lied
CBS lied
CNN lied
All coordinated by the FBI and the Biden DOJ.
What 50 former intelligence officers claimed is irrelevant. Who cares? The U. S. was investigating Russian collusion, the media would be irresponsible not to be reporting on that. I did not read any stories from creditable sources that said collusion occurred, it only reported the known facts of the investigation. The report claimed there was no collusion although it did result in several convictions.
The media did an excellent job of investigating the election fraud charge and easily disproved most of the allegations. So, the media did its job by finding no collusion occurred and no election fraud occurred.
The media and the administration cared a WHOLE lot. It was the foundation for Third Reich suppression and censorship of information that was harmful to ruling democrat party.
It was a hoax perpetrated by your party to attack a political opponent.
And by "excellent" you mean they served the party faithfully. Openly lied about most of the stories, obfuscated , distorted, hide, slandered, and libeled to further the goals of the party.
The "media" is the handmaiden of the party. About 1 in 5 Americans trusts the media - an absurd number. No one with a functional brain can trust these little Goebbels.
Pravda under Stalin provided far more accurate reporting than the NY Times or CNN do today. The press are liars and disreputable louts - pure propaganda for the party.
You believe the election fraud lies? You obviously did no research to verify any of the false allegations.
Yes, they have. Except jury trial in civil cases, grand jury indictment, and no excessive fines and bail. A google search will inform you of the relevant cases.
Well, we can clarify this issue. Do you believe Joe Biden is the legitimate president or was there voter fraud that changed the election outcome?
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
no they haven't.
You are behind in your constitutional law. That occurred in the 1960s.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
Which procedural right(s) do not apply to the states?
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
habeus corpus.
Look, I know you don't like facts, you exist on party propaganda and march in lockstep to the Reich media - but..
There are 23 million invalid registrations in the 50 states (it's not 57, Barry is confused). The party spends billions of dollars to ensure that the dead and those who have moved remain on registration rolls. (yes, I can easily cite it)
Why does the party not want clear voter registration? Can you take a guess?
Given that mail in ballots in Pennsylvania require no signature check or address verification under the "no fault" voting system that the state supreme court instituted, is there an opportunity for invalid votes from millions of dead voters (or those who have moved?)
I know, facts are inconvenient. You have your party to support and protect.