I appreciate the articulate and concise summary of all the ills which have caused conservatives to call for a radical cleansing of our public life. I don't so much disagree with your diagnosis as think that the corruption has been a bipartisan product of shifting conflicts within America's ruling oligarchy, conflicts made more bitter by the changing of our economy brought about by globalization and new technologies. Neither Democrats nor Republicans have clean paws in this fight. As long as the red versus blue shouting match continues, it prevents reform in either party. Both sides need to clean house; neither side can clean the other's house.
I genuinely believe this traces back to what the #1 fear for politicians of each party tend to be:
#1 Republican fear: Slander from the mass media
#1 Democrat fear: Truth being exposed by the mass media
This fear by many Republican politicians has caused some of them to edge closer to the Democrat Party out of fear that if they don't, the corrupt mainstream media may attack their character and try to destroy them and their party by making up lies about them. It also causes them to worry about effectively being able to raise money from donors who become worried about the mainstream media reports they're seeing, regardless of how false the reporting is. It becomes the power of
perception over reality. This is also why, during the rise of the Tea Party, it caused many of them to vote for candidates who would do the will of the people and who portrayed themselves as being
fearless and unafraid of a dishonest and biased media onslaught, and could very well explain why Trump is president today.
Republicans have long felt that they are being held to a
much higher standard by the media. They not only have to be Mother Theresa in character, but they are virtually forced to become Democrats in policy or else be slandered in the media. This is why I say, and will continue to believe, that the corrupt mainstream media is genuinely behind much of the decay that we see in politics today, because if they actually were objective and held everyone to equal standards (exposing and investigating both sides with equal vigor), and an allowance for policy differences to be reported and explained without slander or character assassination, that not only would policies be IMMENSELY better, but so would the political discourse among each side.