Appeals Court Rules Against the Government!

Though a Democrat president managed to keep U.S. safe for 8 full years from any terrorist attack against the U.S. homeland from foreign based terrorists ..." sear #103

its hard to tell the way you post, but is this something you were stupid enough to say or did you quote someone else saying it?........
 
Let's look on the bright side - Trump's lunacy will wear out all the other nutters and send them back to their institutions.
 
Purely political. Didn't cite one constitutional argument for their decision. 9th circuit has always been a left wing clown court.
 
Your reality is a strange one. Trump's Presidency is an embarrassment, and we're only a few weeks in.

oh gosh, can you give an example of where he is more embarrassing than the brainless liberals who attack him?'......lords, the House minority leader can't even remember who she's disparaging and dear Maxine blames him for the invasion or Korea........
 
Are you sure you can keep this up, PMP? Constant apologism can be exhausting.

4 years of this - you should really pace yourself.

I've been pointing out the stupidity of liberals since I came here in 09.....as long as you post stupid things I will be here to point and say "oh look! Stupid things!".....
 
Our dialogue here typifies the shift in mood and tone of public discourse over the past couple of generations. We really aren't concerned about the issues or their implications, serious as they may be; rather, it is a my-guys-against-your-guys kind of squabble. There is almost no objective content to speak of. Politics on social media has come to be dominated by this genre of taunting, so it seems to satisfy a need in a great many people.
 
Of course - just to point out that the fear on which the ban is based is completely unfounded. It's basically irrational.

To ever want an incident would be despicable. Not my m.o.

"Completely unfounded" ya say, eh: hair ball?

I guess you have superior information to the POTUS then: ya extra stupid fool?

Did the CIA and the NSA give you a personal briefing as to the risks associated with these 7 countries?

A below average rock has superior knowledge to you: ya extra stupid hair ball.
 
"Completely unfounded" ya say, eh: hair ball?

I guess you have superior information to the POTUS then: ya extra stupid fool?

Did the CIA and the NSA give you a personal briefing as to the risks associated with these 7 countries?

A below average rock has superior knowledge to you: ya extra stupid hair ball.

You insult below average rocks everywhere! Retract!
 
Our dialogue here typifies the shift in mood and tone of public discourse over the past couple of generations. We really aren't concerned about the issues or their implications, serious as they may be; rather, it is a my-guys-against-your-guys kind of squabble. There is almost no objective content to speak of. Politics on social media has come to be dominated by this genre of taunting, so it seems to satisfy a need in a great many people.
And this shift you noticed directly correlates with the increase in mainstream media corruption and lack of consistent standards, public education Left-wing indoctrination of students, increasingly Regressive Liberal entertainment personalities and programming, the appointments of activist Left-wing judges, and the apparent celebration of moral decay in our society, not the least of which President Bill Clinton helped normalize. All of these things have put the people opposed to this corruption and decay in an awkward position of having to “fight back” in order to restore common sense, education with historical facts, consistent standards, and fidelity to the Constitution and the law. When corruption is so entrenched, it’s not easy to fight it back, and it’s not always going to look pretty… but it must be done still.
 
And this shift you noticed directly correlates with the increase in mainstream media corruption and lack of consistent standards, public education Left-wing indoctrination of students, increasingly Regressive Liberal entertainment personalities and programming, the appointments of activist Left-wing judges, and the apparent celebration of moral decay in our society, not the least of which President Bill Clinton helped normalize. All of these things have put the people opposed to this corruption and decay in an awkward position of having to “fight back” in order to restore common sense, education with historical facts, consistent standards, and fidelity to the Constitution and the law. When corruption is so entrenched, it’s not easy to fight it back, and it’s not always going to look pretty… but it must be done still.
I appreciate the articulate and concise summary of all the ills which have caused conservatives to call for a radical cleansing of our public life. I don't so much disagree with your diagnosis as think that the corruption has been a bipartisan product of shifting conflicts within America's ruling oligarchy, conflicts made more bitter by the changing of our economy brought about by globalization and new technologies. Neither Democrats nor Republicans have clean paws in this fight. As long as the red versus blue shouting match continues, it prevents reform in either party. Both sides need to clean house; neither side can clean the other's house.
 
I appreciate the articulate and concise summary of all the ills which have caused conservatives to call for a radical cleansing of our public life. I don't so much disagree with your diagnosis as think that the corruption has been a bipartisan product of shifting conflicts within America's ruling oligarchy, conflicts made more bitter by the changing of our economy brought about by globalization and new technologies. Neither Democrats nor Republicans have clean paws in this fight. As long as the red versus blue shouting match continues, it prevents reform in either party. Both sides need to clean house; neither side can clean the other's house.

I heard some gossip that said there are 100 traitors indeed in the house and 20 senators indeed. drain the swamp
 
Back
Top