Appeals Court Rules Against the Government!

christiefan915 said:
This seems pretty clear to me: "..neither the Supreme Court nor our court has ever held that courts lack the authority to review executive action in those arenas for compliance with the Constitution.
Click to expand...


so why don't they get off their ass and review it......the Boston judge has schooled these idiots......
 
Midas Whale67 said:
Like duhhhh.

9th Circuit.

Rules liberal.

Totally unexpected.

Said no fucking brain functioning person ever.

Off to the SCOTUS.
Click to expand...

Stick to the issue. Your leader banned travel. That is a fascist calling card. He did it based on a religious test. Strike two. He did it by fiat. Strike three. He had no evidence to support the ban. Strike four. He wrote a law with arbitrary and mass impact. Strike five. Fuck off, bigot.
 
Micawber said:
Stick to the issue. Your leader banned travel. That is a fascist calling card. He did it based on a religious test. Strike two. He did it by fiat. Strike three. He had no evidence to support the ban. Strike four. He wrote a law with arbitrary and mass impact. Strike five. Fuck off, bigot.
Click to expand...

The issue is your retired leader authored that ban and it was enforced believing that Obama, at that juncture in his career would have learned something, fucking ANYTHING about staunching the flow of violence entering our country and potentially entering our country, but he didn't fuckin care.

Fuck yourself Micawful. You know fucking well you would not have said word fucking one if Obama implemented HIS ban. You would have applauded him while simultaneously masterbating yourself, you full of shit panty piddler.

Open your city to these refugees. Let em park under your overpasses and rape your loved ones.

Germany didn't think it would happen, fuckwad, and you might as well get your hand out of Merkel's panties because she's scared shit less now.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
nobody said they were corrupt....we said they were incompetent......
Click to expand...

They are not incompetent, they are corrupt. They had an agenda that they wanted to justify. They made a decision first, and then looked for legal reasons afterwards. They are corrupt as fuck.
 
tsuke said:
lol. So they did not lift the TRO because they said the stance of the government was that the action was "unreviewable" and proceeded to judge based on that. They did not bother to look at it from the current standard of substanial deference to the elected branches as they admit too in their own decision. (around page 12-14)

This is the very definition of a strawman :D About what you would expect from the ninth circuit.
Click to expand...

Wasn't a strawman as that is what the Government said their briefs.
 
It's kind of fun to watch Trump when he doesn't get his way.

His sense of urgency on this is ridiculous - like the delay on this is letting thousands of terrorists into the country, when there hasn't even been one incident he or anyone can point to that this ban would have affected.

He really doesn't know what he's doing. He's in way over his head right now.
 
Micawber said:
Stick to the issue. Your leader banned travel. That is a fascist calling card.
Click to expand...

The President of the United States made a judgement that six countries without stable gubments and zero ability to provide information necessary to vet their people constituted an unacceptable risk to this country, as well as Iran (a state sponsor of terrorism). There is a properly legislated and signed statute that specifically authorizes such an action by the commander in chief.

The Left wing bat shit crazy jurists feel they have the ability to second guess such a lawful decision and need to be impeached as they lack the temperament to carry out their duties.

Micawber said:
He did it based on a religious test. Strike two.
Click to expand...

The specific language of the order belies yer upside down false statement: $0.25.

Micawber said:
He did it by fiat. Strike three.
Click to expand...

The statute authorizes a POTUS to make such an order by proclamation: that's why yer only a two bit lawyer.

Micawber said:
He had no evidence to support the ban. Strike four. He wrote a law with arbitrary and mass impact. Strike five. Fuck off, bigot.
Click to expand...

Yer not even worth the two bits.
 
Thing1 said:
It's kind of fun to watch Trump when he doesn't get his way.

His sense of urgency on this is ridiculous - like the delay on this is letting thousands of terrorists into the country, when there hasn't even been one incident he or anyone can point to that this ban would have affected.

He really doesn't know what he's doing. He's in way over his head right now.
Click to expand...

Do you want an incident?
 
the title of this thread should have read: "appeals court rules against the people" or "appeals court rules according to will of damned" or "appeals court seals their testimony of treason"
 
Thing1 said:
It's kind of fun to watch Trump when he doesn't get his way.

His sense of urgency on this is ridiculous - like the delay on this is letting thousands of terrorists into the country, when there hasn't even been one incident he or anyone can point to that this ban would have affected.

He really doesn't know what he's doing. He's in way over his head right now.
Click to expand...

And if something happened, you would blame Trump.

But in reality, I don't think the ban would work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top