Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
1. Remember, the MSM that his heavily sponsored by Big Pharma has conflated the definitions: like it or not, there is a core group of people who are against any and all vaccinations, preferring non-pharmaceutical approaches to strengthening a child's immunity to various diseases. They do so by pointing out various aspects in medical science that support them in lieu of documentation of adverse effect percentages for kids and adults. The second group I mentioned are about fixing the vaccination regime to a level that children can tolerate and to eliminate ingredients that are not needed due to high possibility of toxicity (this came about during the rising cases of autism in children across the country). For adults, they point to contradictory information on the "success" of the Covid vaccinations.
2. right off the bat you make an ASSUMPTION that contradicts reality and essentially put words in my mouth (or on my keyboard, so to speak). Reality check: the basis for testing a person for the Covid virus is severely flawed, as it's creator stated for years that it was NOT designed to diagnose disease that is making a person sick. And I never stated that the virus was a cell, now did I? I pointed to the FACT that the current basis for all the Covid vaccines is to manipulate your system to artificially heighten (spike) response specifically to one particular virus...that is a genetic manipulation, no matter how temporary or low level. THIS HAS NEVER BEEN THE CASE WITH ALL PREVIOUS VACCINATIONS. Any doctor worth his salt can tell you how long what specific vaccine TRADITIONALLY works. Flu shots, by the way, are geared each year for the particular strain that is going around, which is why you had the Tamiflu incident a few years back, where the shot was ineffective against one year's flu strain which was similar to the previous year. If you can name a vaccine where the "booster" was required in less than 6 months prior to Covid, let me know and we can discuss that.
3. It certainly seems that you think rattling off the status quo mantras while ignoring certain historical aspect and what I actually write legitimizes your arrogant confidence and condescending attitude. Not surprising.
1. The MSM didn't create the definition of a virus. Science did. Your world salad is meaningless drivel in light of actual science. I do love your attempt to accuse others of cherry picking data right before you cherry pick data. The fact that one vaccine had serious side effects is not evidence that all vaccines have side effects any more than the fact that one vaccine didn't have side effects is proof that all vaccines don't have side effects. There is a reason that all new medicines are tested in trials before being approved or even before emergency approval. For someone to not want to take the vaccine which has gone through clinical trials which show it is effective but want to take Invermectin which hasn't gone through any testing to see if it is effective seems pretty nonsensical. Of course people have always been nonsensical but it still doesn't make them right when they are.
2. You make no sense. Testing for the existence of the virus isn't testing to see if the person is sick. Rather the reason to test is often because the person is actually sick. Genetic manipulation of RNA is not gene therapy since RNA is not a gene. How you can not know that genes are made up of DNA is beyond me. You did state that the virus was a cell. It's kind of hard for you to deny what you clearly wrote unless you want to pretend you didn't write it. Or are you arguing that you don't know how to use the English language?
Flu shots are geared for the expected strains based on what is happening in the southern hemisphere. But essentially you get a flu shot for some strains every year. Did you bother to read what you wrote?
"the shot was ineffective against one year's flu strain which was similar to the previous year." If the previous year had inoculated you for that strain how could the strain cause sickness from that strain the following year when the shot didn't include that strain? Flu shots are effective for about 6 months which is the length of the flu season which starts in November and is over in April.
3. I am responded to what you actually write and then you seem to want to pretend you didn't actually write what you actually wrote. Did you not say "dead cells of the virus"? How can a dead cell of a virus exist if there isn't a cell?
