well then that may be an issue. there is clear booing.
thats good you dont use snopes as a difinitive source, but they are no fact checkers either, they are an agenda driven lw propaganda site.
Another great example of how snopes is full of shit.
- Thread starter Underdog
- Start date
well then that may be an issue. there is clear booing.
thats good you dont use snopes as a difinitive source, but they are no fact checkers either, they are an agenda driven lw propaganda site.
1. Nathan Phillips would be a "Vietnam era Veteran" not a "vietnam veteran who served in theater"
2. there is clear booing
3. do you kiss your mother with that mouth?
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
I heard nothing but cheers for the president!
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Prove it!
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
What does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
If Snopes is an agenda driven propaganda site, then they would have said that it's false.
People hear what they want to hear. That's it.
The literary reference to your position on this topic is easy enough for even a high school freshmen to get. Do you really need me to explain it to you?
incorrect, in order to try to maintain even an air of legitimacy they had to call it unproven.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Nice try.
its the truth. they do it all the time. snopes is part of the democrat party propaganda machine.
They still havent figured out that nathan phillips lied about being a vietnam vet.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Why are you fixated on that drumming Indian guy?
you miss the point its not about him, its about the media you believe absolutely lied to you about him.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Oh I get the point. Not that hard to grasp. I remember that many claims were thrown around by various people.
You haven't shown how Snopes lied.
What's True
Native American activist Nathan Phillips said he served in the U.S. Marines and told news outlets that he was a "Vietnam-times" or "Vietnam-era" veteran.
What's False
Contrary to what multiple news reports initially stated, Nathan Phillips was not deployed to Vietnam at any time during his military service.
Once again, you failed.
See the parsing of words. Nathan phillips claimed he served as a vietnam veteran in vietnam.
They lie by omission because he said he was a vietnam vet, and in theater, a sniped and other lies.
he also solicited funds while he was dutching his service (stealing valor)
"I was really trying to figure out what was my purpose here in this world, you know? What was it all about? Vietnam veteran, taken away from my family when I was five, put in foster homes."
"I'm a Vietnam vet… honorable discharge and…what my box says is that I was in theater.
"Myself, I'm a Vietnam Veteran, times like that, you know. My DD-214, my discharge paper, says 'honorable discharge' and it says 'in theater' and then it says 'branch of service, armed services' but we know I was in the Marine Corps."
these are all his words in the link I provided you, showing him stating these things. Why did snopes omit it?
Cause they are a propaganda wing of the left.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
How does that prove that Snopes lied? Snopes SPECIFICALLY said that the media had it wrong.
What's False
Contrary to what multiple news reports initially stated, Nathan Phillips was not deployed to Vietnam at any time during his military service.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Why? Alex Jones isn't a "fact checker."
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
1. DEMOCRATS only seem happy when they’re crying about what a horrible place America is.
2. Kooky Kamala Harris was testing the waters for a 2020 presidential run when she posted the tweet above.
The third truth? Always be skeptical of the 'fact-checkers'.
Harris posted a video in which she claimed that (once Obama was out of office) America was in a "rent crisis", and how a person working a full-time job at the minimum wage couldn’t afford a 1-bedroom apartment.
PolitiFact found it “mostly true.”
Here's the problem with her lie, and with Politifact's rating:
The underlying study she referenced doesn’t say that a minimum wage worker can’t afford any housing in almost all of the United States, but that a minimum wage worker can’t afford the average-priced housing unit.
Maybe if you’re an adult making minimum wage, you’ll have to settle for a less-than-average-priced housing unit? Or get a roommate?
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/07/25/close-enough-politifact-goes-easy-on-sen-kamala-harris-and-her-claim-about-americas-rent-crisis/
If Politifact were rating this being said by say, Donald Trump, or maybe Ted Cruz they'd rate it "mostly false," or "false." That's just how Politifact skews their ratings in general. You can move things one or two towards "True" when they are rating someone they despise, and move things one or two towards "False" when they are rating someone they like or generally agree politically with.