Another day---Another family destroyed

what would you think about forced sterilization for parents who let their kids kill other kids with guns?

Who says we have to wait for the parent to fuck up before we sterilize them? I say you have to take a test at 18. If you fail....well, you don't get to have kids. You should also have to take an additional test if you want to have a child (and again if you want another child). Having a child without a license will result in the child being taken, you being fined for the cost of raising it, and you'll be sterilized. Any felony convictions as well. Or those with mental illnesses or violent tendencies.
 
Actually, if you had read each of the 1000 threads on this subject, you would know that I said the parents in such cases should be charged with negligent homicide. A felony. A felony that would preclude them from owning weapons when released from prison.

I am not confusing you with anyone. I am including you in the group that refuses to answer the question. WHAT regulation would have prevented this from occurring?

so... because we cannot craft a regulation that will prevent everything wrong from happening, we throw up our hands and say, fuck it, why regulate ANYTHING? What reasonable regulations would YOU support that would help to make tragedies with guns more rare?
 
What's the debate? As I posted in the other thread... You talk about compromise for gun laws but don't mention what legislation could have prevented this. We can require that people lock up their guns and not leave them out around children but unless someone from the government is constantly checking everyone's home it's still up to the individuals to follow the law. We can ask for harsher penalties for parents when incidents like this occur but that's not what has been debated in Congress. What do you want to see happen?

What's your issue with my post Topspin? I'm a man I can take it if you disagree with me. I won't be offended. But at least tell me what you don't like/disagree with instead of groaning me. That's some Div 2 sh*t right there. That's not a SEC response.
 
LOL... so we should instead repeat the exact same conversation on the other 50 threads that Zappa and others have started every time an irresponsible gun owner causes the death or harm to a child?

I was providing examples of other things for you to go all faux outrage on... why do you only care about the lives of kids that are dead due to irresponsible use of guns by the parent and not about the kids that die due to irresponsible parental use of cars and sex and bath tubs?

If we need to, absolutely fucking YES!


And you were not "providing examples of other things for you to go all faux outrage on...", you were personally denigrating and minimalizing the life of this child:



What a fucking pig you are...

Are you aware this could happen any day, any time, to any so-called "responsible gun owner", including yourself?

Thank God you don't have children, SF. Thank God...
 
How can we have an 'honest' debate if you refuse to provide us with an example of a regulation that would have prevented this?

The reason you get mocked is because you continue to pretend that an irresponsible gun owner = responsible gun owners. You then pretend that the gun law bill that failed in Congress somehow would have prevented this.

So tell us Zappa... how can we have an honest discussion when you refuse to answer or address anything brought to you?

Instead we get gibberish like your above post.


First it was "you say you want civil debate, but you're not being civil if you're using the phrase "gun nuts" anywhere in your thread".

So to prove how full of it they are, I dropped the "gun nuts" and eliminated that particular excuse and what do they do?

Why, just as I knew they would, they move the goalposts and continue as though nothing is different.
 
Who says we have to wait for the parent to fuck up before we sterilize them? I say you have to take a test at 18. If you fail....well, you don't get to have kids. You should also have to take an additional test if you want to have a child (and again if you want another child). Having a child without a license will result in the child being taken, you being fined for the cost of raising it, and you'll be sterilized. Any felony convictions as well. Or those with mental illnesses or violent tendencies.


So you're okay with forced sterilization...but by GOD nobody better touch your manhoo..er...your guns.

Behold!

A set or priorities SERIOUSLY out of whack!
 
so... because we cannot craft a regulation that will prevent everything wrong from happening, we throw up our hands and say, fuck it, why regulate ANYTHING? What reasonable regulations would YOU support that would help to make tragedies with guns more rare?

Typical left wingnut bullshit. I did not state anything to suggest that we should not regulate anything.

I support background checks, but if the government is not going to allow private citizens access to the database to run said checks, then they cannot require them to have a background check. Otherwise you force them to go find an FFL to get the check done.

I support the laws that state felons and mentally ill people cannot buy guns.

But again, nothing you do is going to prevent a parent from being a dumbass (at least the first time). Trying to regulate away stupidity is not going to happen. If it were possible, the extreme right and left wingnuts would be extinct.
 
so... because we cannot craft a regulation that will prevent everything wrong from happening, we throw up our hands and say, fuck it, why regulate ANYTHING? What reasonable regulations would YOU support that would help to make tragedies with guns more rare?


None...simply put, his guns are more important than the lives of innocent gunshot victims...end of story.
 
What's your issue with my post Topspin? I'm a man I can take it if you disagree with me. I won't be offended. But at least tell me what you don't like/disagree with instead of groaning me. That's some Div 2 sh*t right there. That's not a SEC response.

He and Howey have been on a groaning spree. Toppy just groans anything that doesn't say 'ban all guns, be like France'
 
None...simply put, his guns are more important than the lives of innocent gunshot victims...end of story.

Your bathtub is more important to you than the lives of innocent drowning victims. Your car is more important to you than kids who die of heat exhaustion and hypothermia.
 
Who says we have to wait for the parent to fuck up before we sterilize them? I say you have to take a test at 18. If you fail....well, you don't get to have kids. You should also have to take an additional test if you want to have a child (and again if you want another child). Having a child without a license will result in the child being taken, you being fined for the cost of raising it, and you'll be sterilized. Any felony convictions as well. Or those with mental illnesses or violent tendencies.

So no one is on board with this plan? Why not? It'd solve all these problems that you guys are supposedly outraged about. No more child abuse or kids turning to drugs or any of that shit. By having legal requirements, we can make sure that only qualified people can have children.
 
He and Howey have been on a groaning spree. Toppy just groans anything that doesn't say 'ban all guns, be like France'

Because you keep asking for them. Keep it up.

And I repeat: I seriously hope that when and if you have a child, he/she blows his/her fucking brains out with a gun.
 
What's your issue with my post Topspin? I'm a man I can take it if you disagree with me. I won't be offended. But at least tell me what you don't like/disagree with instead of groaning me. That's some Div 2 sh*t right there. That's not a SEC response.
Inaction on 10,000 gun murders annually
We can and have a moral obligation to do better!
Jah; rastafari
 
Back
Top