Ann Romney: Not All Moms Have the Choice to Be a Stay-At-Home Mom

Voltaire said:
Here's the bottom line, Rune. You are the one claiming that Ann Romney is completely out of touch with reality - that she has no fucking clue what the life of a typical American woman looks like (which, incidentally, didn't seem to be an issue when Teresa Heinz Kerry was your nominee's wife). We have presented evidence to the contrary. You have provided no evidence whatsoever - only the fact that Mitt's father was wealthy. I won't hold my breath.
Click to expand...

Here is the TOP LINE, Volt. Ann may or may not have changed a few diapers 40 or more years ago. You certainly haven't proven so or not.
What is clear though, is that she has never had money worries at all. Money issues are the single largest concern to typical american women, and Ann has NO CONNECTION WHATSOEVER TO THEM, IN FACT SHE COULDN'T POSSIBLY BE MORE OUT OF TOUCH THAN SHE IS. Keep lying to your self, it is the socially conservative way, afterall.
 
Rune said:
Too fucking funny, moron. Next time read your link before you print it. :palm:
Click to expand...

Did YOU read it?

"And yet, as an adult working in the finance sector, Romney appears to have changed things up when it came to his new family. The Boston Globe reported June 27, 2007, "Mitt eschewed the trappings of wealth. The family had no cook or full-time maid." An anonymous source close to the Romneys told the International Business Times Thursday, "No nannies." While the Romneys financial disclosure forms show they had four housekeepers in 2010, the women weren't paid nearly enough to be regular laundresses. Some of the wages paid were for personal-assistant-type chores, instead of washing dishes.

Maybe we're too quick to judge. Perhaps Mitt Romney did his fair share of household chores unlike most American men. Or maybe there are some who think there is something noble about scrubbing your own toilet. But, to us, the idea of being wealthy and still having to do dishes and sort socks and dust things -- it's worse than a war on women. It might be a war crime: wife torture."

So basically, the liberal admits that the Romney's didn't have maids, cooks, or butlers. There you go.

Then the liberal suggests that Mitt is an abusive husband for NOT hiring maids, books, or butlers.

Unbelievable. You really can't win with these fuckers.
 
Voltaire said:
Did YOU read it?

"And yet, as an adult working in the finance sector, Romney appears to have changed things up when it came to his new family. The Boston Globe reported June 27, 2007, "Mitt eschewed the trappings of wealth. The family had no cook or full-time maid." An anonymous source close to the Romneys told the International Business Times Thursday, "No nannies." While the Romneys financial disclosure forms show they had four housekeepers in 2010, the women weren't paid nearly enough to be regular laundresses. Some of the wages paid were for personal-assistant-type chores, instead of washing dishes.

Maybe we're too quick to judge. Perhaps Mitt Romney did his fair share of household chores unlike most American men. Or maybe there are some who think there is something noble about scrubbing your own toilet. But, to us, the idea of being wealthy and still having to do dishes and sort socks and dust things -- it's worse than a war on women. It might be a war crime: wife torture."

So basically, the liberal admits that the Romney's didn't have maids, cooks, or butlers. There you go.

Then the liberal suggests that Mitt is an abusive husband for NOT hiring maids, books, or butlers.

Unbelievable. You really can't win with these fuckers.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I thought that in using a liberal blogger to show that they didn't have maids etc... would get the liberals to stop the proclamations, yet all it gets is Dune face palming himself for some unknown reason. I also posted that link because I found it amusing that once the liberal found out there were no maids that he flipped around and criticized (albeit somewhat sarcastically and thus probably just joking imo) Romney for not hiring help.
 
Voltaire said:
Did YOU read it?

"And yet, as an adult working in the finance sector, Romney appears to have changed things up when it came to his new family. The Boston Globe reported June 27, 2007, "Mitt eschewed the trappings of wealth. The family had no cook or full-time maid." An anonymous source close to the Romneys told the International Business Times Thursday, "No nannies." While the Romneys financial disclosure forms show they had four housekeepers in 2010, the women weren't paid nearly enough to be regular laundresses. Some of the wages paid were for personal-assistant-type chores, instead of washing dishes.

Maybe we're too quick to judge. Perhaps Mitt Romney did his fair share of household chores unlike most American men. Or maybe there are some who think there is something noble about scrubbing your own toilet. But, to us, the idea of being wealthy and still having to do dishes and sort socks and dust things -- it's worse than a war on women. It might be a war crime: wife torture."

So basically, the liberal admits that the Romney's didn't have maids, cooks, or butlers. There you go.

Then the liberal suggests that Mitt is an abusive husband for NOT hiring maids, books, or butlers.

Unbelievable. You really can't win with these fuckers.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding? Only four domestic assistants? Did it occur to you that they don't need a cook or dishwasher if they never eat at home?
Good lord your closemindedness is unbelievable. By the way, Mitt was well known in Mass for hiring illegal aliens. Perhaps that is why the pay was so low? You are out of your fucking mind with your daft interpretations. You too SimpleFreak.
 
Rune said:
Are you kidding? Only four domestic assistants? Did it occur to you that they don't need a cook or dishwasher if they never eat at home?
Good lord your closemindedness is unbelievable. By the way, Mitt was well known in Mass for hiring illegal aliens. Perhaps that is why the pay was so low? You are out of your fucking mind with your daft interpretations. You too SimpleFreak.
Click to expand...

LMAO... in 2010 he had four. Seriously, did you read the article at all?

Now you are making absurd proclamations that they didn't need help because they 'never ate at home'??? Fucking seriously, where do you get this bullshit from?

You also suggest that the 2010 assistants were illegal immigrants? Based on what?

Getting desperate now that the liberal parroting of 'they must have had lots of maids so Ann didn't really raise her kids' is falling apart?
 
Found it...

http://content.usatoday.com/communi...-illegal-immigrant-rick-perry-/1#.T4xPtvUc98g

Romney did not "hire" illegal immigrants. He hired a landscaping company that hired illegal immigrants. So tell us, Dune, do you expect Romney to check out EVERYONE he does business with to verify that they don't hire illegal immigrants?

The burden of responsibility rests with the business, not the consumer. I should not be required to verify that every company I do business with does not hire illegal immigrants. To suggest otherwise is absurd.
 
"The family had no cook or full-time maid."

Oh, the horrer the Romneys lived with.... They did not even have a FULL TIME maid!
 
Jarod said:
It does not say they had no maid, it simply says they had no "full-time maid".

President Obama knows what it is like to grow up without wealth, does Mitt?
Click to expand...

Wrong Jarod. The son stated they had no maid/nanny/mommy helper. The 'anonymous source' is the one that made the 'full time' remark.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... in 2010 he had four. Seriously, did you read the article at all?

Now you are making absurd proclamations that they didn't need help because they 'never ate at home'??? Fucking seriously, where do you get this bullshit from?

You also suggest that the 2010 assistants were illegal immigrants? Based on what?



Getting desperate now that the liberal parroting of 'they must have had lots of maids so Ann didn't really raise her kids' is falling apart?
Click to expand...

Four isn't a lot?
 
Voltaire said:
Found it...

http://content.usatoday.com/communi...-illegal-immigrant-rick-perry-/1#.T4xPtvUc98g

Romney did not "hire" illegal immigrants. He hired a landscaping company that hired illegal immigrants. So tell us, Dune, do you expect Romney to check out EVERYONE he does business with to verify that they don't hire illegal immigrants?

The burden of responsibility rests with the business, not the consumer. I should not be required to verify that every company I do business with does not hire illegal immigrants. To suggest otherwise is absurd.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it is a personal choice for you to make or not make as you see fit. I check, you don't have to.
 
Rune said:
Four isn't a lot?
Click to expand...

Tell us dearest Dune... were her kids grown and out of the house in 2010?

The point moron is that you idiots are suggesting that because the Romneys had four in 2010, that must mean they always had maids. They did not.
 
Superfreak said:
Tell us dearest Dune... were her kids grown and out of the house in 2010?

The point moron is that you idiots are suggesting that because the Romneys had four in 2010, that must mean they always had maids. They did not.
Click to expand...

The real point, moron, is who she is now, not who she was 40 plus years ago.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top