Ann Coulter skewered on The View

they are helping her sell books
doesn't any smart person not know she's a rightwing tool?
Of course it boosts their ratings to, so good on Whoopi
 
She's another total psychopath (in addition to our current President). What is it about her and that loopy smile that she pastes on her face every time someone crushes a point she's trying to make?

Complete nutjob, who the right-wing absolultely adores.
 
I was watching this yesterday because I was at the gym, and it was right in front of my face, but no volume. I was watching her face, and I realized that she purposefully attempts to enrage people with her outlandishness. She does it one, because she enjoys it, and two, because it gives her something to point to - look, another angry liberal.

She's the biggest victim going, and like most cons, she is addicted to causing pain, and to projecting her own motives and evil thoughts onto others.

I agree with Top actually - it's a mistake to give her air time.

I would never debate her. I'd lean over and say, hey whore, this is going to end outside, so let's begin it there. I personally believe she needs a really good, hard, ass kicking, and that is the only energy I would be very willing to expend on her.
 
you have to wonder about the IQ of the people who would watch the view.

a bunch of cackling, washed out, dumb old hens in a chicken coop..

they have to have four liberals to take on the one conservative..:cof1:
 
I was watching this yesterday because I was at the gym, and it was right in front of my face, but no volume. I was watching her face, and I realized that she purposefully attempts to enrage people with her outlandishness. She does it one, because she enjoys it, and two, because it gives her something to point to - look, another angry liberal.

She's the biggest victim going, and like most cons, she is addicted to causing pain, and to projecting her own motives and evil thoughts onto others.

I agree with Top actually - it's a mistake to give her air time.

I would never debate her. I'd lean over and say, hey whore, this is going to end outside, so let's begin it there. I personally believe she needs a really good, hard, ass kicking, and that is the only energy I would be very willing to expend on her.

Another angry violent liberal....
 
Could this thread be more predictable?

Coulter is a total lunatic; there is no critique of her which would be too extreme or out-of-bounds. Yet conservative Coulter-lovers always chime in with "there's that famous leftie tolerance" whenever Ann gets her due.

If there is a tolerant skin cell on Ann Coulter, I have yet to spot it.
 
you all tolerate the hate spewing Keith Olbermann, the ugly hens on the view, what's the difference?

double standard as usual.

the only thing I care about, is a persons right to freedom of speech
 
I was watching this yesterday because I was at the gym, and it was right in front of my face, but no volume. I was watching her face, and I realized that she purposefully attempts to enrage people with her outlandishness. She does it one, because she enjoys it, and two, because it gives her something to point to - look, another angry liberal.

She's the biggest victim going, and like most cons, she is addicted to causing pain, and to projecting her own motives and evil thoughts onto others.

I agree with Top actually - it's a mistake to give her air time.

I would never debate her. I'd lean over and say, hey whore, this is going to end outside, so let's begin it there. I personally believe she needs a really good, hard, ass kicking, and that is the only energy I would be very willing to expend on her.

Another typical vapid liberal response. Since you are not capable of dealing with the substance (borrow a dictionary, I'm certain you don't have a library card) you actually threaten the messenger??!!! Another product of our (liberal) public school system, obviously.

Now focus: can you understand the point made by Ms. Coulter is that the results of having a child out of wedlock is bad for the child and for society???
If not, defend it.

Since you cannot deny points such as

1) 70% of the prison population is the result of single parent out of wedlock liaisons,

2) these liaisons result in poverty for the mother/ offspring and

3) if you take single-motherhood out of the equation, black and white crime rates are the same. You attack the speaker. Fool. In your case an ass kicking is long overdue.
 
you all tolerate the hate spewing Keith Olbermann, the ugly hens on the view, what's the difference?

double standard as usual.

the only thing I care about, is a persons right to freedom of speech

Olbermann's smart & usually right.

Coulter's a pyscho.

:clink:
 
I was watching this yesterday because I was at the gym, and it was right in front of my face, but no volume. I was watching her face, and I realized that she purposefully attempts to enrage people with her outlandishness. She does it one, because she enjoys it, and two, because it gives her something to point to - look, another angry liberal.

She's the biggest victim going, and like most cons, she is addicted to causing pain, and to projecting her own motives and evil thoughts onto others.

I agree with Top actually - it's a mistake to give her air time.

I would never debate her. I'd lean over and say, hey whore, this is going to end outside, so let's begin it there. I personally believe she needs a really good, hard, ass kicking, and that is the only energy I would be very willing to expend on her.

When it comes down to it the peaceful left solve their problems with violence.

And no I don't like Coulter, she is more fringe than most lefties realize, even Rush Limbaugh is reluctant to side with her.
 
Another typical vapid liberal response. Since you are not capable of dealing with the substance (borrow a dictionary, I'm certain you don't have a library card) you actually threaten the messenger??!!! Another product of our (liberal) public school system, obviously.

Now focus: can you understand the point made by Ms. Coulter is that the results of having a child out of wedlock is bad for the child and for society???
If not, defend it.

Since you cannot deny points such as

1) 70% of the prison population is the result of single parent out of wedlock liaisons,

2) these liaisons result in poverty for the mother/ offspring and

3) if you take single-motherhood out of the equation, black and white crime rates are the same. You attack the speaker. Fool. In your case an ass kicking is long overdue.

Wow, that was a very personal attack over something I said about Ann coulter. You must have been holding that in. I hope you didn't hurt yourself.

I find Coulter to be nothing more than a provocateur, who has often wished death upon others. I'm sure you know many of her more outrageous statements; wishing for a terrorist attack on the NY times building, wishing that John Edwards is killed in an attack, calling the 9/11 widows names. I personally have no problem with rabid conservatives defending her - she's good for liberalism. No one sane wants anything to do with her.

As for her stats on single mothers, I don't know if they are correct, because I have no idea where she got them. I do know that calling people vicious names does nothing to contribute to any solution to societal problems. And I also know that a forty something woman who has never had a serious relationship but brags that she has "dated every right winger out there" shouldn't be throwing stones at anyone else's morals.

And I know that a dumb internet whore who has made one serious post, this one, and it's filled with hateful invective, should be careful who she calls stupid.
 
What libs don't get about Coulter is she's performing. It's an over the top charicature. It's designed to annoy the left and appeal to the right. It's designed to make the right laugh. Is she to be taken seriously? Maybe a few points she makes, but she's using comedy to get her political points across.
 
Back
Top