An AR-15 is not a hunting rifle?!!

Legion Troll said:
"Narrative fails". :D
Click to expand...

It fails because the weapon was not modified. That it "can be" doesn't change reality no matter how many times you repeat it or just really wish it were so. The gun was semi-automatic and functionally no different than the other rifles mentioned in this thread.
 
Damocles said:
It fails because the weapon was not modified. That it "can be" doesn't change reality no matter how many times you repeat it or just really wish it were so. The gun was semi-automatic and functionally no different than the other rifles mentioned in this thread.
Click to expand...

Did I say the weapon that shooter Omar used was modified? :dunno:
 
Leonthecat said:
I've heard of it. At that point it becomes not just a fetish but a true sexual fetish.
Click to expand...


Indeed, Brother Leon.


photo1png-12471529-130-lg.png
 
Legion Troll said:
Did I say the weapon that shooter Omar used was modified? :dunno:
Click to expand...

No, you just drop it into the thread as part of your argument against reality that I described. The weapon is not what people think it is, it is functionally the same as all the other rifles mentioned in the thread. It is not "military" it isn't "fully automatic" and fired one round per trigger pull. Now remember all of those facts as you see hoplophobic congressmen/women telling us that these "fully automatic assault" rifles need to be banned because they look scarier than other rifles that function exactly the same way that they do not want to ban because they are not "fully automatic" and aren't "assault" rifles.
 
so what is this proposed gun ban ? chopped liver?
"we have to make sure 'the extremists' cannot get ez access to guns"
 
Damocles said:
It fails because the weapon was not modified. That it "can be" doesn't change reality no matter how many times you repeat it or just really wish it were so. The gun was semi-automatic and functionally no different than the other rifles mentioned in this thread.
Click to expand...
An AR-15 will fire as quickly as you can pull the trigger, with any given magazine, semi auto fire will likely kill more people with the same number of rounds as full auto, so the point about semi vs, full auto, is moot.

https://www.quora.com/How-many-rounds-does-a-semi-automatic-rifle-fire-per-minute
 
Legion Troll said:
But your narrative fails. :D
Click to expand...

And there you go again, Jeb. I think if listen hard enough you can actually hear when Jebbie Troll realized when he lost his narrative. It came right around the first time he mentioned "but, they could be!"

And as I said, the functional difference is nada between the rifles you want to ban with those you think are "less dangerous" because they don't look like the weapons used to scare you in movies.
 
Did I say I want to ban any rifles?

Your narrative fails. :D

Maybe if you PM ILA he'll give you the affirmation you seem to crave.
 
Legion Troll said:
But your narrative fails. :D
Click to expand...

Fun to watch gun fetishists make straw man arguments and think the won the debate.The multi-Lethality of any semiautomatic rifle is best measured by the size of the magazine it can accommodate not whether it is semi or full, auto.
Full auto will put more holes in fewer individuals and 30 round magazines would have to be changed every few seconds.
Restricting magazine capacities makes perfect sense if we are interested at all in reducing the numbers of deaths in mass murders.
The 30 round magazine is ridiculous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top