An AR-15 is not a hunting rifle?!!

Bedwetter said:
That is the point. The AR15 argument is a distraction. They intend to word it to ensnare more than the AR15 It is fun watching Legion Troll get frustrated with your common sense posts. He doesn't like it when his trolling attempts fall flat. Who knows, maybe he will rage quit for the third time like Yurt?
Click to expand...

Think so?
 
Leonthecat said:
Do you work for Chevrolet or something?

Etymology

To vet was originally a horse-racing term, referring to the requirement that a horse be checked for health and soundness by a veterinarian before being allowed to race. Thus, it has taken the general meaning "to check".[2]
It is a figurative contraction of veterinarian, which originated in the mid-17th century. The colloquial abbreviation dates to the 1860s; the verb form of the word, meaning "to treat an animal", came a few decades later—according to the Oxford English Dictionary, the earliest known usage is 1891[3]—and was applied primarily in a horse-racing context ("He vetted the stallion before the race", "You should vet that horse before he races", etc.).
By the early 1900s, vet had begun to be used as a synonym for evaluate, especially in the context of searching for flaws.


Does the good Pastor take his dog to the "vette?
LOL.
Click to expand...

you feel free to make any errors you want......we'll forgive you......I mean, it's not like anyone actually gave a fuck what you think, is it now......
 
Damocles said:
And there you go again, Jeb. I think if listen hard enough you can actually hear when Jebbie Troll realized when he lost his narrative. It came right around the first time he mentioned "but, they could be!"

And as I said, the functional difference is nada between the rifles you want to ban with those you think are "less dangerous" because they don't look like the weapons used to scare you in movies.
Click to expand...

lol.....Trollop be the basketball and Damo just Harlem Globetrottered all over his ass.......
 
Lefties have turned the mad Muslim killer into a gun control argument .. hardly surprising and totally predictable. They want to blame american gun owners and the second amendment.

I wouldn't argue with them and let them divert the topic if I were you. They hate admitting that Islam played the part of the killer in it's extreme form, not Americans with guns.
 
thilly wabbit said:
Lefties have turned the mad Muslim killer into a gun control argument .. hardly surprising and totally predictable. They want to blame american gun owners and the second amendment. I wouldn't argue with them and let them divert the topic if I were you. They hate admitting that Islam played the part of the killer in it's extreme form, not Americans with guns.
Click to expand...

Was shooter Omar an American with a gun?
 
PostmodernBater1636813 said:
see post #120 to refresh your memory.....
Click to expand...

The gun fetishists think they won a debate that didn't exist.
That's what a straw man is, Pimp.

They successfully argued that Omar's gun was not a fully automatic military weapon. No one was arguing that it was.
Poor Pimp.
 
Leonthecat said:
The gun fetishists think they won a debate that didn't exist.
That's what a straw man is, Pimp.

They successfully argued that Omar's gun was not a fully automatic military weapon. No one was arguing that it was.
Poor Pimp.
Click to expand...

oh, so you missed the debate between Trollop and Damo......its a shame......it was classic......
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Good an expert on guns amongst a pack of liberals lol. I was wondering something. The shooter would have had to stop and put a new cartridge in several times at least, right? Where was the other guy with the gun when he did that? If I were in that situation I would take cover and listen for the shooting to stop and then go for a shot. Or would the window be too narrow?
Click to expand...

SmarterthanYou said:
the standard model of an AR has the magazine release button on the mag well. that requires taking one hand off the weapon to depress it, pull the mag out, grab another mag, insert and seat it properly, and then you have to slide the carrier bolt home for it to load again. takes at least 3 seconds for someone that is familiar with their weapon. for an untrained person, maybe 5 or more.
Click to expand...


:rolleyes:
 
PostmodernLiar said:
oh, so you missed the debate between Trollop and Damo......its a shame......it was classic......
Click to expand...

I saw some gun fetishists make a straw man argument about automatic weapons that no one but they brought up, and then tirelessly pat themselves on the back for being such experts, but there really was no debate to be seen, Pimp.
In fact I argued that semiautomatic rifles are probably more lethal in a mass shooting than fully automatics.
 
Leonthecat said:
The gun fetishists think they won a debate that didn't exist.
That's what a straw man is, Pimp.

They successfully argued that Omar's gun was not a fully automatic military weapon. No one was arguing that it was.
Poor Pimp.
Click to expand...

Your sock Legion said it was a fully automatic military weapon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top