Amount of CO2 being sucked away by Earth 'has doubled in 50 years'

cancel2 2022

Canceled
'Surprising study' means models need changing. Again


By Lewis PageGet more from this author
Posted in Science, 2nd August 2012 15:28 GMT

US federal government boffins have announced a "surprising new study" which reveals that the amount of carbon dioxide being drawn out of the air and absorbed by the world's landmasses and oceans doubled from 1960 to 2010. The new information is deemed sufficiently applecart-busting in climatology terms that it has been published in flagship boffinry journal Nature today. The "surprising" description comes from an accompanying announcement by Colorado uni, where some of the investigating scientists were based. "Earth is taking up twice as much CO[SUB]2[/SUB] today as it was 50 years ago," says Colorado postdoc Ashley Ballantyne, lead author of the new paper, in tinned quotes issued by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - whose boffins were also involved in the research.

According to the NOAA:

This new global analysis makes it clear that scientists do not yet understand well enough the processes by which ecosystems of the world are removing CO[SUB]2[/SUB] from the atmosphere, or the relative importance of possible sinks: regrowing forests on different continents, for example, or changing absorption of carbon dioxide by various ocean regions.

"We don't know why or where this process is happening," commented NOAA boffin Pieter Tans. "We need to identify what's going on here, so that we can improve our projections of future CO[SUB]2[/SUB] levels and how climate change will progress in the future."

According to the Colorado uni announcement:

Recent studies by others have suggested carbon sinks were declining in some areas of the globe, including parts of the Southern Hemisphere and portions of the world's oceans. But the new Nature study showed global CO[SUB]2[/SUB] uptake by Earth's sinks essentially doubled from 1960 to 2010.

Apparently the forces sucking carbon from the air have increased in power especially strongly in recent years:
According to the study, the scientists observed decreased CO[SUB]2[/SUB] uptake by Earth's land and oceans in the 1990s, followed by increased CO[SUB]2[/SUB] sequestering by the planet from 2000 to 2010.

"Seeing such variation from decade to decade tells us that we need to observe Earth's carbon cycle for significantly longer periods in order to help us understand what is occurring," says Ballantyne.

The Nature study can be read by subscribers to the journal here. ®



http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/02/co2_absorption_doubled_since_1960/
 
It sounds like the article is saying that the earth has some compensatory processes for dealing with the evils of increased CO2.

It just can't be. It isn't possible.


We were told by Al Gore that we are doomed unless we followed him. Why would he lie? It isn't like he stood to make billions selling carbon credits or anything like that.

And here the left wing cabal had convinced me that man made global warming was real. This obviously changes things. Guess I can hang on to the Suburban and the F250 a little while longer
 

I now see how you got over your addition to alcohol, you have replaced it with an addiction to conspiracy theories and fairy stories. I present you with a peer reviewed study taken from that august journal Nature and what is your response?? :palm:
 
I now see how you got over your addition to alcohol, you have replaced it with an addiction to conspiracy theories and fairy stories. I present you with a peer reviewed study taken from that august journal Nature and what is your response?? :palm:

20 cm
 

VIENNA (AP) — Austrian experts say melting glaciers have been the single greatest cause of rising sea level over the past century.
Scientists at the respected University of Innsbruck say that between 1902 and 2007, glaciers contributed 11 centimeters (4.33 inches) to a total sea level rise of about 20 centimeters (nearly 8 inches).
They also said Wednesday that by 2100, melting glaciers could raise sea levels by another 22 centimeters.

http://news.yahoo.com/glacier-melt-c...141343257.html
 
VIENNA (AP) — Austrian experts say melting glaciers have been the single greatest cause of rising sea level over the past century.
Scientists at the respected University of Innsbruck say that between 1902 and 2007, glaciers contributed 11 centimeters (4.33 inches) to a total sea level rise of about 20 centimeters (nearly 8 inches).
They also said Wednesday that by 2100, melting glaciers could raise sea levels by another 22 centimeters.

http://news.yahoo.com/glacier-melt-c...141343257.html

So what you are really saying is that sea levels could rise by a little over a foot in two centuries!! That's really terrifying, let's all head for the Himalayas now.
 
So what you are really saying is that sea levels could rise by a little over a foot in two centuries!! That's really terrifying, let's all head for the Himalayas now.

No, what I am really saying is that sea levels have risen nearly the length on my appendage, despite your numerous claims that nothing is wrong.
 
No, what I am really saying is that sea levels have risen nearly the length on my appendage, despite your numerous claims that nothing is wrong.

Why is it wrong.....its a proven fact that some deserts far inland were once covered by seas in the past.....

you act like its something totally new....the world changes, it always has and always will and man don't get to control it....can't control it.
 
Why is it wrong.....its a proven fact that some deserts far inland were once covered by seas in the past.....

you act like its something totally new....the world changes, it always has and always will and man don't get to control it....can't control it.

Has anyone claimed man "controls" it? No, they haven't. Just you. Idiot.

Does man have the power to influence it? Think. That is, if you're capable.
 
Has anyone claimed man "controls" it? No, they haven't. Just you. Idiot.

Does man have the power to influence it? Think. That is, if you're capable.


Controls, influences, affects.....same difference......wtf do you think all this "we must lower CO2 emissions in the air" crap is about if not an attempt to "control, affect, influence" the climate
change.

US federal government boffins have announced a "surprising new study" which reveals that the amount of carbon dioxide being drawn out of the air and absorbed by the world's landmasses and oceans doubled from 1960 to 2010.

So if CO2 is getting sucked up for last 50 years, whats with the outcry to control CO2 emissions thats the cause of global warming ?

Oh...wait....that bullshit is now recognized as bullshit...a big lie...the big scare...Al Gores big wallet filler....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top