Amount of CO2 being sucked away by Earth 'has doubled in 50 years'

Your pal did and the pair of you are usually in lockstep. Anyway you keep saying I'm a Big Oil shill so it is not very hard to infer.

Nope. You said I made that claim. Back it up, needledick. 'Usually in lockstep' is a cop out.

And you are a shill for BP. You've demonstrated it ad nauseam on this forum. If you want to backpedal, you better get busy deleting all your BP-whore posts.
 
They appear to have no sense of embarrassment, there is not one among them that has even a semblance of a scientific background or even a logical mind.

notice that even after this post...the liberals or bijou have not offered a single argument to counter the points raised in the OP

bijou is a left wing shill that doesn't understand anything other than what her liberal lords tell her to understand
 
Nope. You said I made that claim. Back it up, needledick. 'Usually in lockstep' is a cop out.

And you are a shill for BP. You've demonstrated it ad nauseam on this forum. If you want to backpedal, you better get busy deleting all your BP-whore posts.

I created a thread earlier about Chevron-Texaco and how there was an oil rig that exploded in Nigeria in almost the same manner as Deepwater Horizon, but I'm sure that you never saw that.
 
Nope. You lose, needledick.


[h=2]I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots. --Albert Einstein [/h]

12_0.541243001352226284_einsteinsidiots.jpg
 
No, what I am really saying is that sea levels have risen nearly the length on my appendage, despite your numerous claims that nothing is wrong.

And what part of sea level changing has not happened in the past? Sea level has ALWAYS changed!
 
And what part of sea level changing has not happened in the past? Sea level has ALWAYS changed!

Can somebody explain to me why we are supposed to be scared of a 16 inch rise between 1900 and 2100, half of which has supposedly happened already?
 
Last edited:
Apparently the forces sucking carbon from the air have increased in power especially strongly in recent years...

OMG, this is SHOCKING! :shock:

Well...... We OBVIOUSLY need the government to pass a bunch of mandates and tax penalties against the people who are obviously responsible, Big Greedy Capitalists! We need to get on this immediately, before idiots wipe out all the CO2! Everyone needs to set your hair on fire and breathlessly repeat this story over and over until the others listen, and if we can get a politician or two to write a book...?
 
Does shilling for BP include blowing the boss under the desk, needledick?

I fail to understand how so called feminists like Bijou who object to sexist language by men when talking about women appear to have no trouble using it themselves. How ironic and hypocritical is that?
 
I fail to understand how so called feminists like Bijou who object to sexist language by men when talking about women appear to have no trouble using it themselves. How ironic and hypocritical is that?

What I object to is sexist scumbaggery such as practiced by needledicks who demonize and blame women generally because they can't get any females to approve of or love them. My comment isn't directed at men in general. It's directed specifically at you. See the difference?
 
What I object to is sexist scumbaggery such as practiced by needledicks who demonize and blame women generally because they can't get any females to approve of or love them. My comment isn't directed at men in general. It's directed specifically at you. See the difference?

No I don't, your attempt at justification is pathetic and hypocritical. There have been men on here who have called women sluts, whores and worse and I have called them out. If you don't believe me ask Christiefan and Rana.
 
What I object to is sexist scumbaggery such as practiced by needledicks who demonize and blame women generally because they can't get any females to approve of or love them. My comment isn't directed at men in general. It's directed specifically at you. See the difference?

What I object to is the scumbaggery way so called feminists defend politically liberal women at the slightest suggestion of disapproval but will never come to
the defense of a conservative women being called a c**t, whore, pig or any other variety of vile, degrading and despicable names......hypocrites to the extreme.

It's directed specifically at you, but at ALL of the feminists hypocrites....including you.
 
No I don't, your attempt at justification is pathetic and hypocritical. There have been men on here who have called women sluts, whores and worse and I have called them out. If you don't believe me ask Christiefan and Rana.

Why would I bother asking anyone anything? I've seen for myself who you are, based on your posts since I arrived. I need nothing further than that.
 
What I object to is the scumbaggery way so called feminists defend politically liberal women at the slightest suggestion of disapproval but will never come to
the defense of a conservative women being called a c**t, whore, pig or any other variety of vile, degrading and despicable names......hypocrites to the extreme.

It's directed specifically at you, but at ALL of the feminists hypocrites....including you.

Oh, looky - another whiny righty who mistakenly thinks I give a shit what he thinks. Oopsie.

:rofl2:
 
Back
Top