American Academy of Pediatrics Calls for Children to Return to Schools Despite Corona

On June 19, the girl's mother noticed that she looked "gray" while sleeping. The girl was then given an unspecified dose of hydroxychloroquine — an arthritis and lupus drug some, including President Donald J. Drumpf, have touted as a possible treatment for COVID-19.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...hydroxychloroquine-treatment-home/5389870002/
you moron:

The girl had struggled with a number of health issues over the years, including a rare nervous-system disorder that resolved when she was 5, obesity and an auto-immune disorder, the report states.

Her mother, a nurse, and a man identified in the report as her father, a physician assistant, gave the girl azithromycin — an antibiotic being studied as a potential COVID-19 treatment — as a protective measure, the report states.
 
How can online learning work if students aren’t online? And what happens if kids don’t participate?
https://www.floridaphoenix.com/2020...ne-and-what-happens-if-kids-dont-participate/

https://www.hindustantimes.com/citi...oom-lessons/story-iQem8daJGDOdkECz94mcjJ.html
Something is better than nothing

Virtual learning by no means can be a replacement for classroom learning. But it can be used effectively to enhance the learning process. Due to the lockdown, many schools and colleges have started online classes but things like understanding the concepts, clearing doubts, interaction with the teacher are not possible in online classes. The environment of a classroom is quite different and it itself makes learning effective. But as something is better than nothing, it’s good to have virtual classes in this period. Rajni Matta, Vishwakarma Town

Online teaching can harm the eyes of the students

Online teaching is a good platform but it is not for everyone. It has some requirements like a good internet connection and an interface, but not e

In-person teaching is a good platform but it's not for everyone. It has some requirements like sanitization, safety, and staff.
 
Yeah, after seeing what happened in NY. Not before it happened in NY.
I'm not sure of the dates -you'd have to cite -but most of your claims are worthless/twisted anyways.
~~

Point is DeSantis not only did not force COVID positive INTO nursing homes;
he also WENT A STEP FURTHER and prohibited VISITATION of relatives

We have a larger population the NY ( AND MORE ELDERLY), but nowhere near the deaths because of Cuomo's directive vs.DeSantis proactive measures
 
all the more reasons kids need person to person interaction. they cant get that from online.

Have you ever Facetimed before? Zoom call? Webex? MS Teams?


Online doesn't allow the nuances of human behavior to be expressed.

Sure it does. You have managed to reveal your horrendous, atrocious behavior on JPP with plenty of nuance. And we're not even video chatting here.


The list is huge - human behavior -especially socialization skill are subtle and complex -
they can't be displayed or discerned readily when online like a physical presence does

There is nothing that proves this. You just want to force interaction because you are pathetically lonely. No one will call you. No one will Facetime with you. You're sad and isolated and you don't want to be anymore.
 
In-person teaching is a good platform but it's not for everyone. It has some requirements like sanitization, safety, and staff.
finally some lucidity from you..
Yes those are requirements - they are not onerous. they can be done with minimal costs and training.

But you still are missing the fact CHILDREN need classrooms for many reasons beside ( and including) learning

College kids can accomodate online learning much more- kids need classrooms
 
Have you ever Facetimed before? Zoom call? Webex? MS Teams?
yes. my entire job and corporate structure are all online -no physical presences whatsoever

Sure it does. You have managed to reveal your horrendous, atrocious behavior on JPP with plenty of nuance. And we're not even video chatting here.
worthless and not germane to the discussion of kids learning

There is nothing that proves this. You just want to force interaction because you are pathetically lonely. No one will call you. No one will Facetime with you. You're sad and isolated and you don't want to be anymore.
LOL. back to your insufferable psyche
 
finally some lucidity from you..
Yes those are requirements - they are not onerous. they can be done with minimal costs and training.

Ah yes, nothing says "let's keep your kids safe" by doing the bare minimum to protect them.


But you still are missing the fact CHILDREN need classrooms for many reasons beside ( and including) learning

Do they need it more or less than being alive?


College kids can accomodate online learning much more- kids need classrooms

So in your mind, the moment someone turns 18 they no longer need to be in a classroom? What is the science behind that? Because the human brain continues to develop to age 25.
 
yes. my entire job and corporate structure are all online -no physical presences whatsoever

Great.

worthless and not germane to the discussion of kids learning

Well look, you said that you cannot achieve nuance to see behaviors online, yet JPP provides probably the best example of showing people's behaviors with nuance here.
 
Ah yes, nothing says "let's keep your kids safe" by doing the bare minimum to protect them.
HA HA HA the requirements are minimal - but they are very effective.
translate:
they are doable/scalable and transferable to kids classrooms

Do they need it more or less than being alive?
kids don't die from COVID -with few exceptions
It's about a "trade off" ( i dont expect you to get nunances).
What is gained by kids in classrooms vs.what risks are involved = the gains are paramount and many
the risks are few

So in your mind, the moment someone turns 18 they no longer need to be in a classroom? What is the science behind that? Because the human brain continues to develop to age 25.
not at all/
By the time kids get to college then are already incorporating independent study/ lectures/and have
a knowledge base that allows for a much more effective learning then kids who don't yet have these learning skills
 
Great.



Well look, you said that you cannot achieve nuance to see behaviors online, yet JPP provides probably the best example of showing people's behaviors with nuance here.
the discussion was about children, not JPP.
~~

You are to the point of flailing inaccuracies, and misstatements. your typical modus operandi when pressed on your trash.
Done with you
 
HA HA HA the requirements are minimal - but they are very effective.

Are they? How do you know? We haven't had in-person classes since March. You have no way of knowing if these things are effective when it comes to COVID.


kids don't die from COVID -with few exceptions

Ah, so all lives don't matter.

"No one dies, except the people who die".


What is gained by kids in classrooms vs.what risks are involved = the gains are paramount and many

You haven't articulated what those gains are, nor have you proven in-person classes are more conducive to learning than online classes.

You've also never been around kids, who spend most of their time on their devices socializing.


not at all/

But that's what you argued. Without any science behind it.

So is there a magic date in someone's life at which in-person classes cease being more effective than online classes?


By the time kids get to college then are already incorporating independent study/ lectures/and have

Have they? You certainly haven't shown those skills here, and you're an adult.


a knowledge base that allows for a much more effective learning then kids who don't yet have these learning skills

Since you've never spent time around kids, you are prone to underestimating their capacity to learn.
 
the discussion was about children, not JPP.

No, the discussion was about your ability to understand and recognize behaviors and nuance online vs. IRL.

My argument is that there is no difference, and that you can read and understand someone's behavior on a Zoom call just as easily as you can in person.

Your argument was that you can only understand behavioral nuance if you're in person, and that judgment is based on nothing, since you said your entire business is done remotely.
 
How can online learning work if students aren’t online? And what happens if kids don’t participate?
https://www.floridaphoenix.com/2020...ne-and-what-happens-if-kids-dont-participate/

https://www.hindustantimes.com/citi...oom-lessons/story-iQem8daJGDOdkECz94mcjJ.html
Something is better than nothing

Virtual learning by no means can be a replacement for classroom learning. But it can be used effectively to enhance the learning process. Due to the lockdown, many schools and colleges have started online classes but things like understanding the concepts, clearing doubts, interaction with the teacher are not possible in online classes. The environment of a classroom is quite different and it itself makes learning effective. But as something is better than nothing, it’s good to have virtual classes in this period. Rajni Matta, Vishwakarma Town

Online teaching can harm the eyes of the students

Online teaching is a good platform but it is not for everyone. It has some requirements like a good internet connection and an interface, but not e

Children need and crave structure, expectation, schedule, order and discipline...and they need daily human face to face interaction to develop healthy social skills.
 
you moron:

The girl had struggled with a number of health issues over the years, including a rare nervous-system disorder that resolved when she was 5, obesity and an auto-immune disorder, the report states.

Her mother, a nurse, and a man identified in the report as her father, a physician assistant, gave the girl azithromycin — an antibiotic being studied as a potential COVID-19 treatment — as a protective measure, the report states.

LV is the most dishonest POS on here.
 
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/05/26/children-transmission

[FONT=&quot]Are any of these studies definitive? The answer is 'No, of course not,'" said Jeffrey Shaman, an epidemiologist at [/FONT]Columbia University[FONT=&quot] who was not involved in the studies. As such, "to open schools because of some uninvestigated notion that children aren't really involved in this, that would be a very foolish thing," Shaman said (Ward, [/FONT]Vox[FONT=&quot], 5/2; Beasley, [/FONT]Reuters[FONT=&quot], 5/19; Malapaty, [/FONT]Nature[FONT=&quot], 5/7; Faulconbridge,[/FONT]Reuters[FONT=&quot], 5/19; Jankowicz, [/FONT]Business Insider[FONT=&quot], 5/22; Mandavilli, [/FONT]New York Times[FONT=&quot], 5/8).[/FONT]
 
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/05/26/children-transmission

[FONT="]Are any of these studies definitive? The answer is 'No, of course not,'" said Jeffrey Shaman, an epidemiologist at [/FONT][/COLOR][B]Columbia University[/B][COLOR=#333E48][FONT="] who was not involved in the studies. As such, "to open schools because of some uninvestigated notion that children aren't really involved in this, that would be a very foolish thing," Shaman said (Ward, [/FONT]Vox[FONT="], 5/2; Beasley, [/FONT][/COLOR][URL="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-children-explainer/explainer-do-children-spread-covid-19-risks-as-schools-consider-reopening-idUSKBN22V33B?feedType=RSS&feedName=healthNews"]Reuters[/URL][FONT="], 5/19; Malapaty, [/FONT][/COLOR][URL="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01354-0"]Nature[/URL][FONT="], 5/7; Faulconbridge,[/FONT][/COLOR][URL="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-epidemiolo/children-with-covid-19-may-be-less-contagious-than-adults-two-uk-epidemiologists-say-idUSKBN22V1K1?feedType=RSS&feedName=healthNews"]Reuters[/URL][FONT="], 5/19; Jankowicz, [/FONT][/COLOR][URL="https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-schools-study-found-2-pupils-infected-863-close-contacts-2020-5"]Business Insider[/URL][FONT="], 5/22; Mandavilli, [/FONT][/COLOR][URL="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/05/health/coronavirus-children-transmission-school.html"]New York Times[/URL][FONT="], 5/8).[/FONT]


Conservatives are so desperate to pretend that everything is OK because acknowledging that things are not OK will have undone the last 4 years of their normalizing of catastrophe.
 
Back
Top