Akin just won't quit.

Saying it over and over doesn't make it true, retard. You have no point. Your only point is to whine and snivel. You stood up for and defended a misogynistic asshole - that's the only point that's obvious here. There's nothing baseless about it - all the proof is here and anyone reading last night already knows it. Deal with it, toady. You showed your colors. And they're hideous.

Thanks for once again proving my point. You toss out baseless accusations, it is all you do.
 
I'm not sure what Tom or any of the other rape threads have to do with WB's OP but I didn't see anyone say they disputed that the OP was real or anyone say they knew it was satire after it had been exposed. Politicians make for great satire because it's not outrageous to think Akin may have said that.
 
Baseless, my ass. You're a condescending turd. A sampling:

Wanna see more, scumbag? Did someone else post that slime or was that you?

Dear Bijou... I think Darla was absolutely the lunatic in the room, though you gave her a good running. She accused Tom of being a rapist, with no evidence at all. Yet she proclaims he is an apologist because he believes his friend when his friend said he was falsely accused. She accuses him of being a liar. Again, no evidence. So yes, I feel she was a lunatic on that thread.

You too made baseless accusations against WB at the beginning of the thread. Which again proves my point, you make baseless accusations... it is your specialty.
 
Dear Bijou... I think Darla was absolutely the lunatic in the room, though you gave her a good running. She accused Tom of being a rapist, with no evidence at all. Yet she proclaims he is an apologist because he believes his friend when his friend said he was falsely accused. She accuses him of being a liar. Again, no evidence. So yes, I feel she was a lunatic on that thread.

You too made baseless accusations against WB at the beginning of the thread. Which again proves my point, you make baseless accusations... it is your specialty.

Dear Scumbag - your inability to part with your penile loyalties doesn't make your idiocy ring any truer to anyone here, so you might as well give up the already-lost fight. You had little credibility to begin with. It's all gone now. Here's a tissue.
 
Wow. This guy is truly a moronic dunderhead. I'm glad the GOP will run a write-in campaign... I mean, just frickin' wow.

Did he really say that?

And what exactly are the perversions? It apparently only cures those, not the homosexuality itself.
 
Oh, he is every bit that idiotic. The only reason you won't hear any more of his idiocy is because the RNC has muzzled him.

If they had that kind of control over him he'd have dropped out of the race when they asked. It is silly to project that kind of control over somebody who abjectly refused to pay attention to them publicly on a different matter.

The reality is, the GOP doesn't like this guy and will run a write-in candidate against him. And that certainly won't be because they have this fictional control you project onto them.
 
If they had that kind of control over him he'd have dropped out of the race when they asked. It is silly to project that kind of control over somebody who abjectly refused to pay attention to them publicly on a different matter.

The reality is, the GOP doesn't like this guy and will run a write-in candidate against him. And that certainly won't be because they have this fictional control you project onto them.

Oh, okay. Go with that, then. :rofl2:
 
IN Reality the RNC has pulled its money out of what they once found to be the most effecient place to put it. They will now spend it somewhere else.

The Democrats will not try to run against the Romney/Ryan/Akin ticket.
 
IN Reality the RNC has pulled its money out of what they once found to be the most effecient place to put it. They will now spend it somewhere else.

The Democrats will not try to run against the Romney/Ryan/Akin ticket.

You don't think that once there is no way to get him out, they'll go back in? That seat is the Democratic firewall against an R takeover of the Senate.
 
Your point's nonexistent. You repeatedly defended rapist apologist Tom, so my accusation of you being a disgusting little toady isn't at all 'baseless'. Neither is my suspicion baseless that Tom may be the rapist 'friend' he described on here. But you go ahead and blindly defend him - such loyalty speaks volumes about you.

You know nothing about me, yet apparently you feel able to make wild accusations. No wonder they booted you off the last forum.
 
After storm following his bullshit statement showing his ignorance of the female reproductive system, Todd Akin has stepped out there another jewel.

"The Republican congressman, already under fire for his controversial comments regarding rape, told a reporter for Cape Giradeau's KBSI 23 News that "female breastmilk - when fed directly to an adult homosexual male daily for at least four weeks - has a 94% chance of permanently curing homosexual perversions.""

http://dailycurrant.com/2012/08/26/...es its healing qualities only work on adults?
 
Dear Bijou... I think Darla was absolutely the lunatic in the room, though you gave her a good running. She accused Tom of being a rapist, with no evidence at all. Yet she proclaims he is an apologist because he believes his friend when his friend said he was falsely accused. She accuses him of being a liar. Again, no evidence. So yes, I feel she was a lunatic on that thread.

You too made baseless accusations against WB at the beginning of the thread. Which again proves my point, you make baseless accusations... it is your specialty.

Dear SF don't be dragging this bullshit into every thread, remember when you said you didn't do this type of thing...so stop now.
 
Dear SF don't be dragging this bullshit into every thread, remember when you said you didn't do this type of thing...so stop now.

Dear Rana, perhaps you would care to actually address the person who brought it into this thread... your friend Bijou.

Thanks.
 
Back
Top