Afghanistan will revert to being a terrorist haven after withdrawal, US report warns

But you're not in Maine are you Comrade dumbass; you're hiding in Mexico.

Once again you bombard us with your inane prattle about cannon fodder; what would a clueless dunce like you know about what it is like to serve in the battlefield? You're just an armchair leftist dunce who seldom if ever gets anything right but is an expert at uttering stupid claims and construction strawman arguments.

Now do run along dumbass; we don't need you to remove all doubt what a clueless dunce you are.

LMFAO @ "And as someone who DID serve in harm's way"; you're too fucking dumb for words Comrade dumbass.

like I said, you know nothing of my service, and only a true coward such as yourself, would denigrate the service of someone who did serve in harm's way. Why, I'll bet you'd say the same thing about Colonel Bill Higgins, USMC. You are a disgrace.
 
Obama inherited a bucket of shit... LBJ filled a bucket with shit.

big difference.

Obama was handed a bucket of shit and kept filling it more and more until hes is now responsible for 75% of the KIA in Afghanistan.....thats the point.

let's remember to stop back here late in the evening on Election night 2016 and compare notes, OK? We'll see who should have stopped digging when we see who the NEXT inhabitant of the White House will be.


Who gets elected is irrelevant to this topic......the fact that some voters are fools and sometimes vote for who fills their pockets with
the most is nothing new....they do love their Obamaphones and food stamps....
 
Afghanistan could become a future terrorist haven when the U.S. withdraws unless a larger and more expensive Afghan security force is planned, a study has warned. The report sketched a scenario in which the Taliban would seek to capitalize on the absence of foreign combat forces and press its campaign to regain political power in Kabul. 'History suggests that the Taliban will use sanctuaries in Pakistan to regenerate their capabilities as military pressure on the movement declines,' the report said.

As a first step, in 2015-16, the Taliban may put additional pressure on Afghan security forces in rural areas, expand their control and influence in areas vacated this year by coalition forces, encircle key cities and conduct high-profile attacks in urban areas, the report said. By 2016-18, after recovering from the military pounding it has taken in recent years from U.S. and coalition forces, the Taliban may be in position to press a more aggressive and intense military campaign. The report also says the U.S. will need to keep pressure on what remains of al-Qaida inside of Afghanistan in order to prevent it from becoming a significant future threat. It said small numbers of al-Qaida members are still active in the remote valleys of northeastern Afghanistan — an assessment shared by U.S. intelligence agencies.



Yea, we are aware the Right Wing will do anything to keep the Military Industrial Complex at war. Paul Ryan proved that last election when he stated "We can't leave during war season"

I won't get into foreign policy but I would love to. Sadly when you talk about FP you somehow attack both major parties.

I WILL say that we avoided WWIII by voting Obama and THAT IS A FACT. Romney/Ryan were on their tanks ready to attack Iran because "they MIGHT have 1 bomb". Luckily, our nations car salesman VP absolutely OWNED Paul Ryan when the kid tried to sell Iran war in the debates.
 
Afghanistan could become a future terrorist haven when the U.S. withdraws unless a larger and more expensive Afghan security force is planned, a study has warned. The report sketched a scenario in which the Taliban would seek to capitalize on the absence of foreign combat forces and press its campaign to regain political power in Kabul. 'History suggests that the Taliban will use sanctuaries in Pakistan to regenerate their capabilities as military pressure on the movement declines,' the report said.

As a first step, in 2015-16, the Taliban may put additional pressure on Afghan security forces in rural areas, expand their control and influence in areas vacated this year by coalition forces, encircle key cities and conduct high-profile attacks in urban areas, the report said. By 2016-18, after recovering from the military pounding it has taken in recent years from U.S. and coalition forces, the Taliban may be in position to press a more aggressive and intense military campaign. The report also says the U.S. will need to keep pressure on what remains of al-Qaida inside of Afghanistan in order to prevent it from becoming a significant future threat. It said small numbers of al-Qaida members are still active in the remote valleys of northeastern Afghanistan — an assessment shared by U.S. intelligence agencies.





The history of the country speaks for itself. Even if we take away the idea that Afghan fight us because we are the west, that country has been waring since the time of Ghengis Khan. Tribalism and the power of tribes is what ails that country.
 
you DID make a prediction and then claim, after the fact, that you had not made a prediction. It is par for the course for you... you blather so much shit, you don't even BOTHER to try and keep it straight, and when someone points out how fucked up you are, you simply respond by insulting them....

it's getting boring.... I gotta tell ya.

Wrong again shit-for-brains; because I really don't care if Hillary runs. Inactually hope she does run. I was merely sharing some information with someone who irrationally appears convinced and fearful she will run and will win.

Now take that special brand of dishonest off topic stupidity you love to wallow in and sit on it.

Dunce.
 
like I said, you know nothing of my service, and only a true coward such as yourself, would denigrate the service of someone who did serve in harm's way. Why, I'll bet you'd say the same thing about Colonel Bill Higgins, USMC. You are a disgrace.

Another incredibly stupid and dishonest post from the King of stupidity.

I know enough about your service to know you're not a warrior, you never served in harms way and that you moronically believe that because you served, your dimwitted uniformed painfully stupid OPINIONS somehow trump every one else's.

I don't denigrate your service you pathetic dishonest moron, I denigrate the incredible and dishonest level of stupidity that erupts from your keyboard.

You're an ignorant, pathetic, dishonest dunce of epic proportions. You're an embarrassment to those who served and did face personal harm and all those who gave their lives serving their country and believing in what they did. You're a pathetic and despicable JPP version of John Kerry.

So please, take your whiney pathetic disingenuous bullshit and shove it. One can only hope you get run over by a bus or taxi while walking your dog and do the world a favor and die a slow miserable death.

Dunce.
 
Yea, we are aware the Right Wing will do anything to keep the Military Industrial Complex at war. Paul Ryan proved that last election when he stated "We can't leave during war season"

I won't get into foreign policy but I would love to. Sadly when you talk about FP you somehow attack both major parties.

I WILL say that we avoided WWIII by voting Obama and THAT IS A FACT. Romney/Ryan were on their tanks ready to attack Iran because "they MIGHT have 1 bomb". Luckily, our nations car salesman VP absolutely OWNED Paul Ryan when the kid tried to sell Iran war in the debates.

You really are THAT fucking stupid. How do tie your shoes every morning being such a retard?

Retards like you wouldn't know a fact if it slapped you on your dense uninformed head.

Moron.
 
The history of the country speaks for itself. Even if we take away the idea that Afghan fight us because we are the west, that country has been waring since the time of Ghengis Khan. Tribalism and the power of tribes is what ails that country.

The Afghan are not fighting us; a small desperate band of Taliban terrorist extremists are trying to prevent the Afghan people from having a representative Democratic government.

It is amazing to me, given the history, that after getting this far, uninformed dunces want us to abandon another nation, which we chose to invade, and allow the Afghan to slide back into the dark ages of despotic rule.

How does that serve US interests and the majority of the Afghan people?
 
How would you know that I never served in harm's way?

Was Colonel Higgins serving in harm's way when he died?

You admitted it you boring pathetic dunce. Your laughable stupid response was that you served with someone who had.

Now run along shit-for-brains; your boring efforts to wallow in the never ending circle of stupidity are a waste of time and off topic.
 
again... nuance of language really gets you every time. I never admitted any such thing. Now answer my question about Colonel Higgins.
 
why can't you answer a simple question?

Was Colonel Higgins serving in harm's way when he died?

Dear shit-for-brains; I don't respond to retarded dimwits who want to spam forums with off topic strawman arguments and dishonest claims.

Damn you are a persistent whiney leftist dumbass.
 
not off topic at all.... you question my credentials. I asked you a simple question... was Colonel Higgins serving in harm's way when he was killed in Beirut? yes or no
 
not off topic at all....

Yes it is off topic shit-for-brains; just like most of the unadulterated stupid bullshit you spam this forum with. Why; because you are a dishonest dumbass.

you question my credentials.

No I do not question your credentials shit-for-brains; I made a statement that you never served where you were in harm’s way and I know you never engaged in combat of any kind other than the imaginary kind where you pretend you are a warrior.

I asked you a simple question... was Colonel Higgins serving in harm's way when he was killed in Beirut? yes or no

Yes it was a “simple” minded and stupid question intended to do nothing but wallow in the never ending circle of stupidity with a dishonest idiot stuck permanently on a special brand of stupid.

Now run along you brain dead repugnant dishonest dumbass; life’s too short for your special brand of stupid.
 
why can't you answer a simple question? Was Higgins serving in harm's way when he died in Beirut? yes or no

are you, perhaps, AFRAID to answer??
 
why can't you answer a simple question? Was Higgins serving in harm's way when he died in Beirut? yes or no

are you, perhaps, AFRAID to answer??

I didn't answer shit-for-brains for the simple fact that I am at a complete loss as to what relevance this has in the debate about abandoning Afghanistan and the factual premise of the thread that by doing so, Afghan will revert back to a terrorist haven. Does it make you a warrior who has the right to believe that your opinion, because you SERVED, has more relevance than those who have not served?

You made some painfully stupid comments on this thread about cannon fodder and losses; what the fuck does an illiterate dunce like you know about it? Because you worked for someone who did? Would Colonel Higgins agree with you that we should turn tail and run from Iraq and Afghanistan? I am doubtful of it but I have never met or talked with Colonel Higgins and you certainly cannot speak for him because you are brain dead leftist twit stuck on stupid.

I am pretty sure that Colonel Higgins would laugh in your face if he saw what you post here having been the victim of a kidnapping and murder by terrorists. But we will never know because he is DEAD.

You’re convinced that freedom can be won without sacrifice and that the Afghan people are not deserving of that effort; we get that. But it doesn't make you smart; and it definitely doesn't make you correct.

So spare me this laughably stupid effort to claim that because you worked with someone who died as a victim of terrorists, this makes you a warrior and expert on sacrifice; it is a painfully stupid and inept claim that only a moron like you can make.

Carry on General dimwit! LOL
 
Back
Top