Aetna to Obamacare: We're outta here

As if repub women don't have abortions. Give me a break.

I'll go out on a limb and say it is more a private issue and rougher decision for "repub" women.

We don't go around celebrating that we can kill unborns because it's our right to. As if it is akin to being able to smoke in public places
 
No concern for the millions who will lose coverage?
No, nanny statist, not really. No concern for the millions who don't give a shit, either way. No concern for the millions who will have extra cash for stuff THEY want, not what the government wants for them. It's called living in a free society. ;)
 
It's your party's platform. Murdering their children is a mother's right.

So much for moral high ground. haha.

All you've done here is highlight the hypocrisy of repugs. They claim to be against abortion but have them anyway.

At least have the honesty to admit it.
 
I'll go out on a limb and say it is more a private issue and rougher decision for "repub" women.

We don't go around celebrating that we can kill unborns because it's our right to. As if it is akin to being able to smoke in public places

It's a decision they chose, rather than having the baby and putting it up for adoption.

Hypocrisy.
 
I look at all those as opportunities for you bleeding heart Liberals to prove you care as much as you claim. It will give you a chance to back up your words that you care by personally providing coverage for all those you claim will lose it. How many will you personally fund? How much concern will you personally show for all those to whom you claim a responsibility? I have responsibility to anyone when it comes to coverage but myself and MY family. Since I have no responsibility to anyone else, there is no accountability on me if they don't get it.
You're like an effing cracked record!!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
I guess..I'm no expert in any of this -but it seems the only real way is single pay..increases the pool to everyone,and doesn't operate for profit.

Then if you want private insurance on top of it ( and will pay for it) you could do that too.
Which is what happens over here.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
It should. But their caring stops at the waters edge of demanding the government take from the rich to distribute to others in an effort to satisfy their conscience.

They actually believe that not minding if the government taxed them and others more in order that people without have healthcare is the same as them actually providing it on their own with their own money. They think compassion can come from demanding someone else foot the bill for what they support. I've wondered for a long time why, if they don't mind paying for it, they have to wait to be told to do something they think is that important.
 
Let's keep it real.


A federal judge has ruled against the proposed acquisition of the health insurance company Humana by its larger rival, Aetna.
The decision is a victory for former President Obama's Justice Department, which sued Aetna last year to block the $34 billion merger, NPR's Yuki Noguchi reported.
The suit alleged that the merger would hurt competition in the health care market, leading to higher prices for consumers and fewer services for Medicare patients.

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...hcare-merger-saying-it-would-hurt-competition

Let's do that. It's not my responsibility to provide any such thing unless those to whom it is provided is done of my own doing or are the ones to which I am responsible (i.e. - MY family). I'm not responsible for providing those you claim to care about so much with anything, therefore, I can't be held accountable is they don't get it. On the other hands, since you seem to think you have a responsibility to them, if they don't get it, it's on you. Funny how you want to hold those of us not responsible accountable when something doesn't happen but try to push the blame on others after claiming you have a responsibility to those without healthcare.
 
Back
Top