It has been widely practiced, particularly by the Left, up to that Supreme Court ruling because for the first time in US history, district courts were issuing nationwide injunctions like parking tickets against Trump.
Nationwide injunctions ordered against the first Trump administration account for more than half of the total injunctions ordered against the federal government since 1963, data show.
More than half of the 127 nationwide injunctions issued against the federal government since 1963 targeted the Trump administration, data show.
www.foxnews.com
A single federal judge in Texas issues an order, and suddenly a new White House policy on immigration or environmental protection freezes across the entire country.
With the stroke of a pen, one of America’s more than 600 federal district judges could halt enforcement of federal laws, regulations, or executive orders against everyone in the United States—not just the people who filed the lawsuit.
A single federal judge in Texas issues an order, and suddenly a new White House policy on immigration or environmental protection freezes across the entire country. With the stroke of a pen, one of America’s more than 600 federal district judges could halt enforcement of federal laws...
govfacts.org
The Left, as always, overplayed their hand and now have been smacked down for it. They destroyed standing legal doctrine by assuming that it could be used with impunity against Trump and nothing adverse would happen in return.