A shot in arm for the Land of the Free.

Justification for appalling crimes against humanity.
Crimes? Nah. Appalling treatment of humanity? Yep, absolutely.

Just remember, The only true war crime is LOSING. (Me)

4677842-Napoleon-Quote-History-is-written-by-the-winners.jpg
 
Crimes? Nah. Appalling treatment of humanity? Yep, absolutely.

Just remember, The only true war crime is LOSING. (Me)

4677842-Napoleon-Quote-History-is-written-by-the-winners.jpg

Hey, if you don't see the slaughter of innocent victims as a "crime" then I guess you and I have very different versions of "morality" (in that I have morality you don't appear to)
 
Hey, if you don't see the slaughter of innocent victims as a "crime" then I guess you and I have very different versions of "morality" (in that I have morality you don't appear to)
I see war as something that only has the limits the combatants choose to put on it. Trying to fight a "limited" war with very strict rules, or turn it into a "police action" is utter stupidity. In WW 2 both sides committed wholesale destruction of cities and the populations within them. Of the utter stupidities the highest is trying to apply criminal codes to military actions.

Like I said: The only true war crime is losing. The winner doesn't try their own people for winning a war in some brutal way. They try the losers for having been brutal.
 
Back
Top