A person is standing in front of a car...........

T. A. Gardner said:
It might when there are multiple officers on the scene. Then again, ICE officers are not really trained for traffic stops and shouldn't have to be doing them. The only reason they are is local politicians, like Walz and Ellison in Minnesota, are dead set against letting ICE do their job in their state and keeping local and state law enforcement from helping them.
Click to expand...
Last time, it is against all training, and contradicts common sense, that standing infront of a car in a confrontation is stupid, fact

Not that it matters, but they weren’t doing a traffic stop, and as we’ve seen, ICE has stopped numerous vehicles, usually by boxing vehicles in with other vehicles. And no one is purposely against ICE doing their job, rather the storm trooper Gestapo manner in which they are doing it, as I noted previously, ever since Homeland was started, federal authorities have been enforcing the law except they never did it wearing masks or employing assault style tactics
 
Jarod said:
The answer to your question would depend on the entirety of the facts.

If she only clipped him, I would say she did not have the intent to commit murder or even attempted murder.

She might be guilty of reckless endangerment. The police should, if the entirety of the facts support it, arrest her for reckless endangerment.
Click to expand...
Yall are killing me, seriously. Sonya Messy picked up a pot of boiling water, dropped to her knees in fear, while an officer on the other side of a room emptied 9 bullets into this woman's body claiming HE FEARED FOR HIS LIFE.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It might when there are multiple officers on the scene.
Click to expand...
Exactly.

One officer is in front of the vehicle. Another is conducting the conversation with the driver and still another with the passengers.
The driver and passenger was lawfully ordered to exit the vehicle. Instead the driver decided to run for it. THAT ALONE IS CAUSE TO DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO STOP THE VEHICLE!

Running over a cop to get away from cops or using any weapon against a cop will easily result in you getting shot.
T. A. Gardner said:
Then again, ICE officers are not really trained for traffic stops and shouldn't have to be doing them.
Click to expand...
This wasn't a traffic stop. It was dealing with an insurrectionist and domestic terrorist. She is a paid, professional agitator. She has been seen at several dozen events and paid for each appearance. She was there to intentionally interfere with federal officers.
T. A. Gardner said:
The only reason they are is local politicians, like Walz and Ellison in Minnesota, are dead set against letting ICE do their job in their state and keeping local and state law enforcement from helping them.
Click to expand...
Walz has broken the law by supporting the defrauding of the federal government and by supporting domestic terrorism. Those crows are finally coming home to roost.

...and to think Kamala wanted this clown for VP.
 
archives said:
Last time, it is against all training, and contradicts common sense, that standing infront of a car in a confrontation is stupid, fact
Click to expand...
Go learn what 'fact' means, Standing in front of the car has a purpose. I already described it to you, anchovies.
archives said:
Not that it matters, but they weren’t doing a traffic stop,
Click to expand...
Correct. They were dealing with a domestic terrorist.
archives said:
and as we’ve seen, ICE has stopped numerous vehicles, usually by boxing vehicles in with other vehicles.
Click to expand...
This is but one tactic they use to capture illegal aliens and domestic terrorists, yes.
archives said:
And no one is purposely against ICE doing their job,
Click to expand...
YOU ARE. So was Ms. Good and her passenger.
archives said:
rather the storm trooper Gestapo manner in which they are doing it, as I noted previously, ever since Homeland was started, federal authorities have been enforcing the law except they never did it wearing masks or employing assault style tactics
Click to expand...
Riot troops often wear face covering to protect themselves from domestic terrorists.
This year is 2026, anchovies. There is no Gestapo.
 
Into the Night said:
It IS reasonable, anchovies. The purpose is to prevent the vehicle from just driving off.

It worked. The driver didn't get away with just driving off.
Click to expand...
Right, standing in front of a suspect’s car is a good idea, always going to stop the perk, got it

You know there is a reason kids are taught not to stand infront or behind a running vehicle
 
Into the Night said:
Go learn what 'fact' means, Standing in front of the car has a purpose. I already described it to you, anchovies.

Correct. They were dealing with a domestic terrorist.

This is but one tactic they use to capture illegal aliens and domestic terrorists, yes.

YOU ARE. So was Ms. Good and her passenger.

Riot troops often wear face covering to protect themselves from domestic terrorists.
This year is 2026, anchovies. There is no Gestapo.
Click to expand...
NEXT
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top