A great first step to ending Abortion!

LV426 said:
Oh, I responded to them when I rejected them.
Click to expand...
A rejection, based on claimed 'absurdity', is not a response. You have provided no counterargument.

LV426 said:
What you haven't responded to are the questions and prompting of why you believe what you believe.
Click to expand...
Abortion is infanticide. It is immoral. It goes against the teachings of The Bible...

LV426 said:
We know you don't give a shit about the sanctity of life, so your reasons for opposing abortion are about something else.
Click to expand...
I do, actually... You simply keep saying that I don't, thinking that repetition somehow makes a false statement true...

LV426 said:
I think that something else is the fact that you lack control in your life, so you feel you have to exert it on others legislatively.
Click to expand...
Psychoquackery.

LV426 said:
The reason you lack control in your life is because no one respects you. So no one feels compelled to offer you control.
Click to expand...
See above.

LV426 said:
So really, that need for control comes from a place of impotence.

You're an impotent person who needs control to feel secure.

Like I said before, you're not very complicated people. You're rather simple.
Click to expand...
See above...
 
gfm7175 said:
A rejection, based on claimed 'absurdity', is not a response. You have provided no counterargument.
Click to expand...

WTF are you talking about?

You're losing track of the thread and mixing up posts and users.

I have answered every single shitty thing you've posted here.

You're the one who is searching for the red herrings and taking it upon yourself to be the arbiter of what is a fallacy all to avoid answering for your motivation for opposing abortion.

Like I said, you're not very complicated people...you're simple.
 
gfm7175 said:
Abortion is infanticide. It is immoral. It goes against the teachings of The Bible.
Click to expand...

1. Abortion isn't infanticide because infants are infants once they are born, not while in the womb.

2. Immoral according to whom?

3. Immoral according to your interpretation of text from 1611 that was commissioned by a barely-literate English King from Scotland.

So your entire frame of reference for everything is a book of Stone Age fables adapted 408 years ago.
 
gfm7175 said:
Psychoquackery.
Click to expand...

Why won't you answer to it?

If it's all mishegoss, should be simple for you to say "I'm not that and here's why..."

Instead, though, you just throw a label out there rather lazily.

So maybe you are all those things, and your continued resistance to admitting it is just denial.
 
gfm7175 said:
A rejection, based on claimed 'absurdity', is not a response. You have provided no counterargument.


Abortion is infanticide. It is immoral. It goes against the teachings of The Bible...


I do, actually... You simply keep saying that I don't, thinking that repetition somehow makes a false statement true...


Psychoquackery.


See above.


See above...
Click to expand...

It's funny how you refuse to answer or respond to arguments about the motivations behind why you believe what you believe.

You want to have it both ways here; you want to be sanctimonious, yet you don't want anyone questioning your veracity, sincerity, or honesty.

A total coward. No wonder women don't respect you.
 
gfm7175 said:
Abortion is a righteous thing to be angry about. It is infanticide; it is murder.
Click to expand...

Abortion is none of your business.

You will never know why a woman gets an abortion.

You will never even know if a woman gets an abortion.

That lack of control seems to be motivating your need to infringe on the privacy of women and their health care.

It's either the lack of control, or that you want to proliferate your shitty genes and forced birth is solely how you accomplish that.
 
LV426 said:
It's funny how you refuse to answer or respond to arguments about the motivations behind why you believe what you believe.

You want to have it both ways here; you want to be sanctimonious, yet you don't want anyone questioning your veracity, sincerity, or honesty.

A total coward. No wonder women don't respect you.
Click to expand...

I told you why. You didn't like my answer.
 
gfm7175 said:
I told you why. You didn't like my answer.
Click to expand...

You lied and said something about the sanctity of life.

But we both know that's bullshit.

So what's really the motivation behind your opposition to abortion? Don't be afraid. You've already shown your worst instincts here, so there's really nothing you could say at this point that could make you look any worse than a forced birth, pro-rape enthusiast.
 
gfm7175 said:
I told you why. You didn't like my answer.
Click to expand...

I don't buy your sincerity, so you have a problem.

You can't establish your opposition to abortion because of "life" (or whatever) is in good faith because there's no way for you to prove your sincerity on that.

Someone consumed with the sanctity of life would definitely support a ban on guns; would definitely support an end to the death penalty; would definitely support getting rid of our military and not engaging in any more conflicts; would definitely support asylum seekers; would definitely support programs that help single mothers and kids.

But you don't support any of that. So you don't really give a shit about the sanctity of life.

So two questions:

1. What is truly motivating your opposition to abortion?

2. Why do you feel you have to hide behind false motivations?
 
Wolverine said:
Well it turned out wrong as there is no right in the constitution given that allows murder! What about unborn women where are their rights
Click to expand...
There is no person, yet, thus no murder. Even the Bible teaches abortion (Numbers 5). As usual, you are raving.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
Psychoquackery.


Why are so many leftists extremely angry about everything?? Relax a bit... It's just discussion on an online forum...
Click to expand...
It seems to be the righties who are extremely angry about everything.



Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
Correct. It doesn't have the power to legalize, nor ban, abortion nationwide. This issue, constitutionally, should rather be a state by state issue...
Click to expand...
Which is, in essence, what Roe v. Wade said. It also put limits on what the states could do.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top