Not in the slightest.
I don't believe your sincerity here.
Women in your life, that you trust, are lying to you about abortion because they don't trust you.
Women in your life don't trust you.
Not in the slightest.
Bigotry. Psychoquackery.
So why are you even commenting?I don't have kids and don't want kids.
I loathe children.
But my personal views on children have nothing to do with a woman's choice to have an abortion.
Any further psychoquackery and/or bigotry from you will be ignored on sight, as it is not adding anything substantive to this discussion...
It's highly likely there are several women in your life who have had an abortion and who have not told you about it because they don't trust you.
Nice goalpost shift.
So you're not about the sanctity of life, you're just about controlling women and forcing them to birth your rape baby.
Stop. Just stop.
You're the ones who were so driven to anger that you had to shoot a doctor in a church and bomb abortion clinics.
You're also the people who shoot up temples, churches, supermarkets, Waffle Houses, schools, yoga studios, and movie theaters.
Spare me this bullshit.
A fetus isn't a person.
Secondly, abortion is none of your business.
Thirdly, the reason a woman gets an abortion will never be your business.
Finally, abortion has nothing to do with you and your crocodile tears about the sanctity of life.
No one buys it anymore. The playbook is old and stale.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ohio-abortion-law-heartbeat-governor
Ohio Gov. Bill DeWine signed into law on Thursday one of the nation's toughest restrictions on abortion.
The Republican governor signed the so-called "heartbeat" bill after the state legislature approved the legislation on Wednesday.
TEXAS BILL THAT COULD IMPOSE DEATH PENALTY ON WOMEN WHO UNDERGO ABORTIONS FAILS IN COMMITTEE
John Kasich, DeWine's Republican predecessor, vetoed the measure twice while in office. He said such a law would create a costly court battle and likely be found unconstitutional.
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––
Before DeWine signed the legislation Thursday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said they were preparing a constitutional challenge to the law on behalf of Pre-Term Cleveland and three other Ohio abortion clinics.
"Similar versions of this unconstitutional abortion ban stand 0-4 in federal court. Soon to be 0-5," the Ohio chapter tweeted, while the ACLU said: "We'll see you in court."
The bill — which makes no exceptions for rape or incest — is among the most restrictive abortion measures in the country.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Other states like Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississipi, Missouri, South Carolina and West Virginia are among the states that have either passed "heartbeat" legislation or are hoping to do so.
This comes as states like New York, New Mexico, Maryland, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia, among other Democratic-leaning states, are supporting bills that allow abortion up to the moment of birth.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Nicole Darrah covers breaking and trending news for FoxNews.com.
Let them sue the sick baby killing ghouls, there is nothing in the constitution that states murder be allowed!
It's highly likely you are nuts!
Unfortunately, the right isn't interested in the abortion issue out of a concern for fetal life. If they were, they'd focus first on the low-hanging fruit -- all the ways you can prevent unnecessary fetal deaths without criminalizing a woman's decision to end an unwanted pregnancy. If they focused there, they'd find many on the left were their strongest allies. Among those ideas (most of which I stole from another forum):
(1) Make sure high-reliability contraception is convenient and affordable for everyone (e.g., get rid of the rule that lets certain privileged bosses deny their employees contraception coverage under their health insurance plans).
(2) Roll out proven birth-control education (e.g., sex-ed focused on preventative measures rather than the proven failure of abstinence-only education).
(3) Provide better subsidies for pre-natal healthcare (this will reduce miscarriages, which are obviously a threat to fetal life).
(4) Provide paid maternity leave (not only will this make taking a pregnancy to term more economically practical for people living paycheck to paycheck, but it will also cut down on women with complicated pregnancies engaging in the risky practice of working right up to delivery because they can't afford to have their income interrupted, and that will mean fewer pre-term births and miscarriages).
(5) Work to reduce the social stigma for unwed motherhood, which will cut back on abortions that occur because a woman can't face the stigma of people knowing she got pregnant out of wedlock.
(6) Better subsidies for obstetric and neonatal care, to cut down on infant mortality.
(7) Better subsidies for child care, so more economically distressed women can see a realistic path to raising a child.
(8) More government regulation of large-serving sugary drinks and other drivers of obesity (obesity significantly increases miscarriage rates).
Each of those things would reduce deaths by a lot more than tilting at windmills with abortion-criminalization laws, which will only tend to force the procedures underground or out of the country. This isn't like the pre-Roe era, when it was difficult for women to get abortions through means other than domestic clinics. These days, with the Internet, abortion pills, and cheap international travel, even if abortion were illegal nation-wide, most women with unwanted pregnancies would be able to figure out a work-around. So, other than the sick thrill of making their lives harder by forcing them into an illegal procedure or a trip abroad, there's little to be gained by the tack the right wing is taking. So, why aren't they taking a more effective and cooperative tack to reduce fetal deaths? The answer, of course, is that punishing women is the entirety of the point. They simply don't care about those fetuses, other than as an excuse for attacking women who make sexual decisions they don't approve of.
Of course it's about life, I have no problem with birth control but you pay for it yourself!
we have the best prenatal care in the world
Wedlock is the only place a pregnancy should take place.
So why are you even commenting?
It's highly likely you are nuts!
It's so not about "control"....
I have never raped anyon!
Nonsense you need mental help!
What you call fetus is a human being, and that is all it will ever be, you call it fetus to soothe your aching, soul ghoul!
Unfortunately, the right isn't interested in the abortion issue out of a concern for fetal life. If they were, they'd focus first on the low-hanging fruit -- all the ways you can prevent unnecessary fetal deaths without criminalizing a woman's decision to end an unwanted pregnancy. If they focused there, they'd find many on the left were their strongest allies. Among those ideas (most of which I stole from another forum):
(1) Make sure high-reliability contraception is convenient and affordable for everyone (e.g., get rid of the rule that lets certain privileged bosses deny their employees contraception coverage under their health insurance plans).
(2) Roll out proven birth-control education (e.g., sex-ed focused on preventative measures rather than the proven failure of abstinence-only education).
(3) Provide better subsidies for pre-natal healthcare (this will reduce miscarriages, which are obviously a threat to fetal life).
(4) Provide paid maternity leave (not only will this make taking a pregnancy to term more economically practical for people living paycheck to paycheck, but it will also cut down on women with complicated pregnancies engaging in the risky practice of working right up to delivery because they can't afford to have their income interrupted, and that will mean fewer pre-term births and miscarriages).
(5) Work to reduce the social stigma for unwed motherhood, which will cut back on abortions that occur because a woman can't face the stigma of people knowing she got pregnant out of wedlock.
(6) Better subsidies for obstetric and neonatal care, to cut down on infant mortality.
(7) Better subsidies for child care, so more economically distressed women can see a realistic path to raising a child.
(8) More government regulation of large-serving sugary drinks and other drivers of obesity (obesity significantly increases miscarriage rates).
Each of those things would reduce deaths by a lot more than tilting at windmills with abortion-criminalization laws, which will only tend to force the procedures underground or out of the country. This isn't like the pre-Roe era, when it was difficult for women to get abortions through means other than domestic clinics. These days, with the Internet, abortion pills, and cheap international travel, even if abortion were illegal nation-wide, most women with unwanted pregnancies would be able to figure out a work-around. So, other than the sick thrill of making their lives harder by forcing them into an illegal procedure or a trip abroad, there's little to be gained by the tack the right wing is taking. So, why aren't they taking a more effective and cooperative tack to reduce fetal deaths? The answer, of course, is that punishing women is the entirety of the point. They simply don't care about those fetuses, other than as an excuse for attacking women who make sexual decisions they don't approve of.