A great first step to ending Abortion!

Bigotry. Psychoquackery.

How is it bigotry?

You keep leaning on the "psychoquackery" but you don't actually refute it.

Then you posture that it doesn't get to you, when it clearly does.

Look at us now, having a debate about your sincerity. This is exactly where I wanted this debate to be. I know you're not sincere in your beliefs. I think you know that too.
 
Any further psychoquackery and/or bigotry from you will be ignored on sight, as it is not adding anything substantive to this discussion...

Well, the problem is that we can't have a debate about abortion without debating why you have the position you have.

We know it's got nothing to do with the sanctity of life...so what is it really about?

I believe it's about control. You want to control women legislatively because you cannot control them in your personal life. The fact that you cannot control women makes you angry because you think you're entitled to that control. I want to know where that entitlement came from.
 
Nice goalpost shift.

So you're not about the sanctity of life, you're just about controlling women and forcing them to birth your rape baby.

Stop. Just stop.

That is the stupidest thing I have read in awhile, that you can't see the difference between ending the life of a murderer, and an innocent human, does not surprise me!

I have never raped anyon!
 
You're the ones who were so driven to anger that you had to shoot a doctor in a church and bomb abortion clinics.

You're also the people who shoot up temples, churches, supermarkets, Waffle Houses, schools, yoga studios, and movie theaters.

Spare me this bullshit.

Nonsense you need mental help!
 
A fetus isn't a person.

Secondly, abortion is none of your business.

Thirdly, the reason a woman gets an abortion will never be your business.

Finally, abortion has nothing to do with you and your crocodile tears about the sanctity of life.

No one buys it anymore. The playbook is old and stale.

What you call fetus is a human being, and that is all it will ever be, you call it fetus to soothe your aching, soul ghoul!
 
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ohio-abortion-law-heartbeat-governor

Ohio Gov. Bill DeWine signed into law on Thursday one of the nation's toughest restrictions on abortion.

The Republican governor signed the so-called "heartbeat" bill after the state legislature approved the legislation on Wednesday.

TEXAS BILL THAT COULD IMPOSE DEATH PENALTY ON WOMEN WHO UNDERGO ABORTIONS FAILS IN COMMITTEE

John Kasich, DeWine's Republican predecessor, vetoed the measure twice while in office. He said such a law would create a costly court battle and likely be found unconstitutional.
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––

Before DeWine signed the legislation Thursday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said they were preparing a constitutional challenge to the law on behalf of Pre-Term Cleveland and three other Ohio abortion clinics.

"Similar versions of this unconstitutional abortion ban stand 0-4 in federal court. Soon to be 0-5," the Ohio chapter tweeted, while the ACLU said: "We'll see you in court."

The bill — which makes no exceptions for rape or incest — is among the most restrictive abortion measures in the country.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Other states like Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississipi, Missouri, South Carolina and West Virginia are among the states that have either passed "heartbeat" legislation or are hoping to do so.

This comes as states like New York, New Mexico, Maryland, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia, among other Democratic-leaning states, are supporting bills that allow abortion up to the moment of birth.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Nicole Darrah covers breaking and trending news for FoxNews.com.

Let them sue the sick baby killing ghouls, there is nothing in the constitution that states murder be allowed!

Unfortunately, the right isn't interested in the abortion issue out of a concern for fetal life. If they were, they'd focus first on the low-hanging fruit -- all the ways you can prevent unnecessary fetal deaths without criminalizing a woman's decision to end an unwanted pregnancy. If they focused there, they'd find many on the left were their strongest allies. Among those ideas (most of which I stole from another forum):

(1) Make sure high-reliability contraception is convenient and affordable for everyone (e.g., get rid of the rule that lets certain privileged bosses deny their employees contraception coverage under their health insurance plans).

(2) Roll out proven birth-control education (e.g., sex-ed focused on preventative measures rather than the proven failure of abstinence-only education).

(3) Provide better subsidies for pre-natal healthcare (this will reduce miscarriages, which are obviously a threat to fetal life).

(4) Provide paid maternity leave (not only will this make taking a pregnancy to term more economically practical for people living paycheck to paycheck, but it will also cut down on women with complicated pregnancies engaging in the risky practice of working right up to delivery because they can't afford to have their income interrupted, and that will mean fewer pre-term births and miscarriages).

(5) Work to reduce the social stigma for unwed motherhood, which will cut back on abortions that occur because a woman can't face the stigma of people knowing she got pregnant out of wedlock.

(6) Better subsidies for obstetric and neonatal care, to cut down on infant mortality.

(7) Better subsidies for child care, so more economically distressed women can see a realistic path to raising a child.

(8) More government regulation of large-serving sugary drinks and other drivers of obesity (obesity significantly increases miscarriage rates).

Each of those things would reduce deaths by a lot more than tilting at windmills with abortion-criminalization laws, which will only tend to force the procedures underground or out of the country. This isn't like the pre-Roe era, when it was difficult for women to get abortions through means other than domestic clinics. These days, with the Internet, abortion pills, and cheap international travel, even if abortion were illegal nation-wide, most women with unwanted pregnancies would be able to figure out a work-around. So, other than the sick thrill of making their lives harder by forcing them into an illegal procedure or a trip abroad, there's little to be gained by the tack the right wing is taking. So, why aren't they taking a more effective and cooperative tack to reduce fetal deaths? The answer, of course, is that punishing women is the entirety of the point. They simply don't care about those fetuses, other than as an excuse for attacking women who make sexual decisions they don't approve of.
 
Unfortunately, the right isn't interested in the abortion issue out of a concern for fetal life. If they were, they'd focus first on the low-hanging fruit -- all the ways you can prevent unnecessary fetal deaths without criminalizing a woman's decision to end an unwanted pregnancy. If they focused there, they'd find many on the left were their strongest allies. Among those ideas (most of which I stole from another forum):

(1) Make sure high-reliability contraception is convenient and affordable for everyone (e.g., get rid of the rule that lets certain privileged bosses deny their employees contraception coverage under their health insurance plans).

(2) Roll out proven birth-control education (e.g., sex-ed focused on preventative measures rather than the proven failure of abstinence-only education).

(3) Provide better subsidies for pre-natal healthcare (this will reduce miscarriages, which are obviously a threat to fetal life).

(4) Provide paid maternity leave (not only will this make taking a pregnancy to term more economically practical for people living paycheck to paycheck, but it will also cut down on women with complicated pregnancies engaging in the risky practice of working right up to delivery because they can't afford to have their income interrupted, and that will mean fewer pre-term births and miscarriages).

(5) Work to reduce the social stigma for unwed motherhood, which will cut back on abortions that occur because a woman can't face the stigma of people knowing she got pregnant out of wedlock.

(6) Better subsidies for obstetric and neonatal care, to cut down on infant mortality.

(7) Better subsidies for child care, so more economically distressed women can see a realistic path to raising a child.

(8) More government regulation of large-serving sugary drinks and other drivers of obesity (obesity significantly increases miscarriage rates).

Each of those things would reduce deaths by a lot more than tilting at windmills with abortion-criminalization laws, which will only tend to force the procedures underground or out of the country. This isn't like the pre-Roe era, when it was difficult for women to get abortions through means other than domestic clinics. These days, with the Internet, abortion pills, and cheap international travel, even if abortion were illegal nation-wide, most women with unwanted pregnancies would be able to figure out a work-around. So, other than the sick thrill of making their lives harder by forcing them into an illegal procedure or a trip abroad, there's little to be gained by the tack the right wing is taking. So, why aren't they taking a more effective and cooperative tack to reduce fetal deaths? The answer, of course, is that punishing women is the entirety of the point. They simply don't care about those fetuses, other than as an excuse for attacking women who make sexual decisions they don't approve of.

Of course it's about life, I have no problem with birth control but you pay for it yourself! It should be criminal to end a child's life! I was taught sex ed in High school in the 80's has that changed? we have the best prenatal care in the world. Provide your own money for maternity leave, if you can't provide for a child do not become pregnant! Wedlock is the only place a pregnancy should take place. Sex causes pregnancy if you are not responsible enough to care for a child do not engage in risky behavior!
 
Of course it's about life, I have no problem with birth control but you pay for it yourself!

You make my point. You don't care about those lives even enough to pay taxes to subsidize birth control... but you're cool with paying taxes to punish women who choose to end their pregnancies (or doctors who help them), right? That's because the lives aren't the driver for you. The punishment is.

we have the best prenatal care in the world

We do not. Look at miscarriage rates and infant mortality rates and you'll see we are well down the list.

Wedlock is the only place a pregnancy should take place.

And by pushing your religious stigma on others, you help to ensure that more women will get abortions in order to avoid the shame of letting people know they got pregnant out of wedlock. But since you don't care about the death of those fetuses, you're fine with that. The point is to punish the women, after all.
 
What you call fetus is a human being, and that is all it will ever be, you call it fetus to soothe your aching, soul ghoul!

Science calls it a fetus.

But that has nothing to do with the fact that abortion is none of your business.

You want to make it your business because no woman would voluntarily proliferate your deficient genes.
 
Unfortunately, the right isn't interested in the abortion issue out of a concern for fetal life. If they were, they'd focus first on the low-hanging fruit -- all the ways you can prevent unnecessary fetal deaths without criminalizing a woman's decision to end an unwanted pregnancy. If they focused there, they'd find many on the left were their strongest allies. Among those ideas (most of which I stole from another forum):

(1) Make sure high-reliability contraception is convenient and affordable for everyone (e.g., get rid of the rule that lets certain privileged bosses deny their employees contraception coverage under their health insurance plans).

(2) Roll out proven birth-control education (e.g., sex-ed focused on preventative measures rather than the proven failure of abstinence-only education).

(3) Provide better subsidies for pre-natal healthcare (this will reduce miscarriages, which are obviously a threat to fetal life).

(4) Provide paid maternity leave (not only will this make taking a pregnancy to term more economically practical for people living paycheck to paycheck, but it will also cut down on women with complicated pregnancies engaging in the risky practice of working right up to delivery because they can't afford to have their income interrupted, and that will mean fewer pre-term births and miscarriages).

(5) Work to reduce the social stigma for unwed motherhood, which will cut back on abortions that occur because a woman can't face the stigma of people knowing she got pregnant out of wedlock.

(6) Better subsidies for obstetric and neonatal care, to cut down on infant mortality.

(7) Better subsidies for child care, so more economically distressed women can see a realistic path to raising a child.

(8) More government regulation of large-serving sugary drinks and other drivers of obesity (obesity significantly increases miscarriage rates).

Each of those things would reduce deaths by a lot more than tilting at windmills with abortion-criminalization laws, which will only tend to force the procedures underground or out of the country. This isn't like the pre-Roe era, when it was difficult for women to get abortions through means other than domestic clinics. These days, with the Internet, abortion pills, and cheap international travel, even if abortion were illegal nation-wide, most women with unwanted pregnancies would be able to figure out a work-around. So, other than the sick thrill of making their lives harder by forcing them into an illegal procedure or a trip abroad, there's little to be gained by the tack the right wing is taking. So, why aren't they taking a more effective and cooperative tack to reduce fetal deaths? The answer, of course, is that punishing women is the entirety of the point. They simply don't care about those fetuses, other than as an excuse for attacking women who make sexual decisions they don't approve of.

But if those things are put in place, then over what will Conservatives cry crocodile tears?
 
Back
Top