A Deeper dive into Mamdani grocery stores...

Great.

Glad you are willing to admit this Trump admin is making what you guys point out as Mamdani socialism and danger to private businesses, look tame in comparison.

Trump is showing no signs of slowing this consistent run of socialist corporate investments.
Now compare Cuban and Mamdami's government grocery stores, retard. :troll:
 
f0f.gif
 
YOU are the one making the argument that it is the sheer magnitude of spending that's important here. You say Trump bailing out Spirit is worse than Mamdani building unneeded grocery stores. Well, by that scale, California--and the federal government under several administrations--is worse for trying to build high speed fail.

That is your argument, isn't it?
It is not difficult Terry.

Taxpayers Pay X Trillon in taxes each year.

Govt Agency 1 - wastes Hundreds of Billions of those tax payer dollars

Agency 2 - wastes $10 million of those tax payer dollars.

You argue that the tax payer WILL NOT know which they are more concerned as you say what matters to the taxpayer is what percent of the budget did they waste.

I argue the taxpayer cares far more about what percent of THEIR MONEY PAID IN was wasted than what percent of budget and thus it is easy to say taxpayers care about hundreds of billions of THEIR DOLLARS wasted, than they do $10M of their dollars.

Your view is so absurd you would never find a single person to agree with. No one will say 'I am more concerned about my $10m wasted tax dollars than i am the hundreds of billions of my tax dollar wasted as i care about what Terry does which is percent of budget and not my total dollars wasted'.
 
Redefinition fallacy. Go learn what 'fascism' means.
you're just a corporate cocksuck so you hate the truth of this definition.
Attempted justification by insult.
banker bailouts are fascism.
Nope. They are communism.
citizens united is fascism.
Nope. It's a lobbying group.
excessive regulation to keep out new businesses are fascism.
Correct.
protection of cartels and monopolies is fascism.
Correct.
 
Nope.

Your attempt to change the argument fails.

This is not about one person, or one town who may have a personal experience that colors their view. That is, as you would say if i tried to offer that example, anecdotal and a fallacy to push forward.

We are speaking to 'taxpayers as a group' and always were.

The question being answered is 'when taxpayers collectively pay X in taxes what concerns them more when it comes to waste'? Which would they want stopped more in the next budget because it was the bigger concern?

A - the percent of the dollars they paid in (example $1 M dollars of which 30% is wasted, or $300K)

or

B - the percent of the budget even if the amount is much smaller (example budget of $100K where 40% is wasted or $40K)

If you ask a taxpayer which waste of their dollars bothers them more, and if you could only stop one recurring again next year, all but you will say wasting $300k of the $1M we put in bothers us more.

You argue they will say 'nope we care more about 'percent of budget' so if we have to chose stop the $40K waste and let the $300K waste of our dollars go through.

You argue that as you are stupid.
Repeitiion fallacy. You already posted this.
 
Back
Top