countryboy
Verified User
Ignorance? Words have meaning. You leftist fucks don't get to redefine them to suit your whims.shed your ignorance, cretinoid snakeous fluxer.
Ignorance? Words have meaning. You leftist fucks don't get to redefine them to suit your whims.shed your ignorance, cretinoid snakeous fluxer.
Now compare Cuban and Mamdami's government grocery stores, retard.Great.
Glad you are willing to admit this Trump admin is making what you guys point out as Mamdani socialism and danger to private businesses, look tame in comparison.
Trump is showing no signs of slowing this consistent run of socialist corporate investments.

you're trapped in the idiot delusion of the left/ right dichotomy.Ignorance? Words have meaning. You leftist fucks don't get to redefine them to suit your whims.
It is not difficult Terry.YOU are the one making the argument that it is the sheer magnitude of spending that's important here. You say Trump bailing out Spirit is worse than Mamdani building unneeded grocery stores. Well, by that scale, California--and the federal government under several administrations--is worse for trying to build high speed fail.
That is your argument, isn't it?
Redefinition fallacy. Go learn what 'fascism' means.right.
Attempted justification by insult.you're just a corporate cocksuck so you hate the truth of this definition.
Nope. They are communism.banker bailouts are fascism.
Nope. It's a lobbying group.citizens united is fascism.
Correct.excessive regulation to keep out new businesses are fascism.
Correct.protection of cartels and monopolies is fascism.
Inversion fallacy.;You put a lot of effort into these silly streams of attention whoring strawman babblings. You must be very lonely.
Repeitiion fallacy. You already posted this.Nope.
Your attempt to change the argument fails.
This is not about one person, or one town who may have a personal experience that colors their view. That is, as you would say if i tried to offer that example, anecdotal and a fallacy to push forward.
We are speaking to 'taxpayers as a group' and always were.
The question being answered is 'when taxpayers collectively pay X in taxes what concerns them more when it comes to waste'? Which would they want stopped more in the next budget because it was the bigger concern?
A - the percent of the dollars they paid in (example $1 M dollars of which 30% is wasted, or $300K)
or
B - the percent of the budget even if the amount is much smaller (example budget of $100K where 40% is wasted or $40K)
If you ask a taxpayer which waste of their dollars bothers them more, and if you could only stop one recurring again next year, all but you will say wasting $300k of the $1M we put in bothers us more.
You argue they will say 'nope we care more about 'percent of budget' so if we have to chose stop the $40K waste and let the $300K waste of our dollars go through.
You argue that as you are stupid.
Inversion fallacy.;
YARPWhatever makes your Mom happy. Don't forget to take your vitamins and pick up your toys.