A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

Yes, it was her desperate and despicable deflections to avoid answering the question as to why this Administration KNOWINGLY LIED to the American people.

You thought it was something else? Please notice in the video that she refused to acknowledge or answer the question as to why the Administration lied. This is a common tactic of deceitful liars under oath; attack the questioner but never answer the question.






only brain washed tea tards buy your shit swill
 
I guess you missed those tapes of R. Regan being deposed in the Iran Contra Affair.

What do Reagan and Iran Contra have to do with Benghazi? Oh that's right, NOTHING; just another dishonest attempt to deflect and obfuscate from the thread topic.

OR, are you insinuating that if a Republican doesn’t answer questions under oath, it is okay if Democrats do it?

Carry on dunce.
 
I guess you missed those tapes of R. Regan being deposed in the Iran Contra Affair.

And that has what to do with this situation? Why blue the lines? And I didn't miss anything, I call out politicians and their stupidity equally. I just called out Christie a day or 2 ago for his ridiculous coverup of the "trafficgate". So yes, I think ALL politicians should answer, answer respectfully and honestly, and that fully includes republicans as well. But my bad, I thought this thread was about Benghazi.
 
Exactly, she was not saying... What difference does it make that Americans Died, as you Conservatives like to pretend.

What she was saying was... What difference does it make if some people said it was a reaction to a video or not, its our job to find out NOW why four Americans died.
 
Exactly, she was not saying... What difference does it make that Americans Died, as you Conservatives like to pretend.

What she was saying was... What difference does it make if some people said it was a reaction to a video or not, its our job to find out NOW why four Americans died.

I agree.....Why did Hillary deny repeated requests for additional security?
 
Exactly, she was not saying... What difference does it make that Americans Died, as you Conservatives like to pretend.

What she was saying was... What difference does it make if some people said it was a reaction to a video or not, its our job to find out NOW why four Americans died.

Not sure who you are responding to. But anyway, never said she was stating it directly about dead Americans, but rather about the investigation itself. The questions were about what took place, and contrary to Hillary and others, I do think it matters.
 
And that has what to do with this situation? Why blue the lines? And I didn't miss anything, I call out politicians and their stupidity equally. I just called out Christie a day or 2 ago for his ridiculous coverup of the "trafficgate". So yes, I think ALL politicians should answer, answer respectfully and honestly, and that fully includes republicans as well. But my bad, I thought this thread was about Benghazi.

I only brought it up because you suggested it had never happened before.
 
Not sure who you are responding to. But anyway, never said she was stating it directly about dead Americans, but rather about the investigation itself. The questions were about what took place, and contrary to Hillary and others, I do think it matters.


your as right wing con brains washed as they get.

who you fooling
 
The Iraq war started in 1991.

I am talking about the second Iraq War, the reigniting of hostilities.

I know we never had formal peace after the first war, but all honest people know the difference between Bush, Sr.'s Iraq war and Bush, Jr's Iraq war.
 
I've asked this everywhere. You'll never get straight answers, or at least honest ones. They fucked up and didn't take the requests seriously. As a result, Americans lost their lives.


wow see what fox news get you ?


bad info
 
They will fight about one issue relating to Benghazi until they are shown how silly they are being, then they will simply jump to "Why did Obama refuse to call it a terrorist attack".

Once you show them that he did, they will say... Why didn't he send in a rescue mission?

Once you show them that such was not possible they will say... Why did Senator Clinton refuse additional security requests ahead of time...

Once you shot them that such was not reasonable they will say.. Why did President Obama refuse to call it a terrorist attack.

And on and on and on and on and on......
 
I am talking about the second Iraq War, the reigniting of hostilities.

I know we never had formal peace after the first war, but all honest people know the difference between Bush, Sr.'s Iraq war and Bush, Jr's Iraq war.

Are yup going to tell us why Hillary denied repeated requests for additional security?
 
They will fight about one issue relating to Benghazi until they are shown how silly they are being, then they will simply jump to "Why did Obama refuse to call it a terrorist attack".

Once you show them that he did, they will say... Why didn't he send in a rescue mission?

Once you show them that such was not possible they will say... Why did Senator Clinton refuse additional security requests ahead of time...

Once you shot them that such was not reasonable they will say.. Why did President Obama refuse to call it a terrorist attack.

And on and on and on and on and on......

You just said additional security was not possIble. Since when is sending security when asked not possible? That's a lie.

- - - Updated - - -

Ok, go with that. So if we invaded North Korea tomorrow, would the American people think of the Korean war of the 50's and the new war.. the same thing?

I don't care what anyone thinks if it's wrong
.

- - - Updated - - -

You still haven't given a reason for Hillary denying repeated requests for additional security.
 
Back
Top