A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

For many years the State Department has been engaged in a struggle to obtain the resources necessary to carry out its work, with varying degrees of success. This has brought about a deep sense of the importance of husbanding resources to meet the highest priorities, laudable in the extreme in any government department. But it has also had the effect of conditioning a few State Department managers to favor restricting the use of resources as a general orientation. There is no easy way to cut through this Gordian knot, all the more so as budgetary austerity looms large ahead.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf

- - - Updated - - -

One overall conclusion in this report is that Congress must do its part to meet this challenge and provide necessary resources to the State Department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf
 
For many years the State Department has been engaged in a struggle to obtain the resources necessary to carry out its work, with varying degrees of success. This has brought about a deep sense of the importance of husbanding resources to meet the highest priorities, laudable in the extreme in any government department. But it has also had the effect of conditioning a few State Department managers to favor restricting the use of resources as a general orientation. There is no easy way to cut through this Gordian knot, all the more so as budgetary austerity looms large ahead.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf

- - - Updated - - -

One overall conclusion in this report is that Congress must do its part to meet this challenge and provide necessary resources to the State Department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf

Why were repeated requests for additional security measures denied by Hillary's State Department? She had enough security to party and provide hookers for her own security.
 
Imagine this:

An investigator asks George W. Bush about the WMD's supposedly in Iraq, and then the lives lost since 2003. He responds with "What difference does it make now"
 
Imagine this:

An investigator asks George W. Bush about the WMD's supposedly in Iraq, and then the lives lost since 2003. He responds with "What difference does it make now"

The difference is that the WMD claim was made before the war in Iraq as justification for the war in Iraq and literally hundreds of thousands of people died as a result.
 
The difference is that the WMD claim was made before the war in Iraq as justification for the war in Iraq and literally hundreds of thousands of people died as a result.

And democrats voted for it. Don't bother telling me Bush lied. Bush was saying the exact same things about Saddam and Iraq as the Clinton administration.
 
And democrats voted for it. Don't bother telling me Bush lied. Bush was saying the exact same things about Saddam and Iraq as the Clinton administration.
Remember we are talking about Benghazi, you were trying to compare the two....
 
Secretary Clinton did not deny, nobody lied. Sadly people did die, and the Republicans have tried to make political points ever since.
 
The difference is that the WMD claim was made before the war in Iraq as justification for the war in Iraq and literally hundreds of thousands of people died as a result.

The request for security was made prior to the debacle in Benghazi too. And I'm sorry, whether one American life lost or thousands, they shouldn't be shrugged off.

- - - Updated - - -

Secretary Clinton did not deny, nobody lied. Sadly people did die, and the Republicans have tried to make political points ever since.

I've seen many of the email requests. If not Hillary, WHO denied the extra details? And do you not think she is ultimately responsible for her department?
 
Back
Top