A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

christiefan915 said:
Stop your senseless bleating and read through all the links and articles we've provided.
Click to expand...

I've read more about this than you know and thats why you're lying. Your job is to help Hillary. You openly admit it. You lie. To suggest that four Americans were denied security because of republicans and a budget cut is about the sickest crap I've witnessed from you filthy trash.
 
Ishmael Pequod said:
The truth is multiple requests for additional security were denied. That us what you cant deny because it's on record. Lying scum.
Click to expand...

I am not denying it. Who gives a fuck how many times any Ambassador requests shit from the State Department? It is only in HINDSIGHT that we see that Stevens' requests might have been more pressing than any of the other requests that flow into that department from Ambassadors every day.

Now... show me where I have told ONE SINGLE LIE, or apologize for calling me a liar. Asshole.
 
maineman said:
I am not denying it. Who gives a fuck how many times any Ambassador requests shit from the State Department? It is only in HINDSIGHT that we see that Stevens' requests might have been more pressing than any of the other requests that flow into that department from Ambassadors every day.

Now... show me where I have told ONE SINGLE LIE, or apologize for calling me a liar. Asshole.
Click to expand...
He cannot. He has been told by his indoctrination unit that liberals always lie. You are a liberal. He is not smart enough to question the cult leaders programing what is left of his mind. What else do you want to know?
 
it really is sad that the right in America has been reduced to pathetic sound bites that no one but their faithful far-right base even listens to anymore. Any attempts to engage them in finding common ground is met with nothing but hatred and derision.... and they think that the middle of the bell curve somehow doesn't NOTICE that?
 
christiefan915 said:
Suck on this. Stevens was denied additional security because the House " ... in 2011 passed a continuing resolution for the remainder of that fiscal year. The House proposed $70 million cut in the WSP and they proposed a $204 million cut in Embassy security," says Mr. Lilly. "Then the next year, fiscal 2012, they cut worldwide security by $145 million and embassy security by $376 million. This year's bill is the same thing all over again. The House has cut the worldwide security budget $149 million below the request."
Click to expand...
were either of those bills passed by the senate and signed by the president?.....
 
christiefan915 said:
"The Board found that Ambassador Stevens made the decision to travel to Benghazi independently of Washington, per standard practice. Timing for his trip was driven in part by commitments in Tripoli, as well as a staffing gap between principal officers in Benghazi. Plans for the Ambassador’s trip provided for minimal close protection security support and were not shared thoroughly with the Embassy’s country team, who were not fully aware of planned movements off compound. The Ambassador did not see a direct threat of an attack of this nature and scale on the U.S. Mission in the overall negative trendline of security incidents from spring to summer 2012. His status as the leading U.S. government advocate on Libya policy, and his expertise on Benghazi in particular, caused Washington to give unusual deference to his judgments."

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf
Click to expand...
And...as previously noted here, he ignored information that there was a 100% chance that Benghazi would be attacked by AQ
 
christiefan915 said:
Suck on this. Stevens was denied additional security because the House " ... in 2011 passed a continuing resolution for the remainder of that fiscal year. The House proposed $70 million cut in the WSP and they proposed a $204 million cut in Embassy security," says Mr. Lilly. "Then the next year, fiscal 2012, they cut worldwide security by $145 million and embassy security by $376 million. This year's bill is the same thing all over again. The House has cut the worldwide security budget $149 million below the request."
Click to expand...

Dear lying leftist dunce; budget cuts had nothing to do with the fiasco in Benghazi. Constantly repeating the same lie over and over again won't make it any less of a lie.
 
Next Christiefan will tell us all about the video. You know "the video"... That caused a "spontaneous uprising"... The one some dude is in jail for right now. That's what did it.

You're going backwards in your argument, Christie.
 
maineman said:
Stevens was not "assigned" to Benghazi... He was stationed in Tripoli, at the embassy there. Embassies are where Ambassadors are stationed, not at consulates.
Click to expand...

Why was Stevens in Benghazi dunce? Oh wait, you're claiming he just decided to take a little field trip on his own and therefore, his bosses are not culpable for his and three other American deaths; Stevens is responsible for his and three other Americans deaths because he should not have been sight seeing there in the first place.

You really are a dishonest moron of epic proportions.
 
Last edited:
Truth Detector said:
Why was Stevens in Benghazi dunce? Oh wait, you're claiming he just decided to take a little field trip on his own and therefore, his bosses are not culpable for his and three other American deaths; Stevens is because he should not have been sight seeing there in the first place.

You really are a dishonest moron of epic proportions.
Click to expand...
Tripoli told Washington that Stevens was going to Benghazi.... not the other way around. I refer you to the state department link in post #172.
 
maineman said:
Squeezing blood frm a turnip is difficult. Show us where the state department should have known that the security at Benghazi should have been more important than other unmet security needs.
Click to expand...

Dear dishonest dunce; the State Department was made aware of it by Stevens himself. They were made aware of it by the Libyans. They were made aware of it by their allies who had pulled their missions because they realized they could not protect them adequately on the steadily deteriorating environment.

Only a moron can pretend that the State Departmebt wasn't aware of the situation, AND, an inept incompetent President with an equally incompetent Sec State.

You take dishonesty and plain old stupid to epic heights.
 
christiefan915 said:
"The Board found that Ambassador Stevens made the decision to travel to Benghazi independently of Washington, per standard practice. Timing for his trip was driven in part by commitments in Tripoli, as well as a staffing gap between principal officers in Benghazi. Plans for the Ambassador’s trip provided for minimal close protection security support and were not shared thoroughly with the Embassy’s country team, who were not fully aware of planned movements off compound. The Ambassador did not see a direct threat of an attack of this nature and scale on the U.S. Mission in the overall negative trendline of security incidents from spring to summer 2012. His status as the leading U.S. government advocate on Libya policy, and his expertise on Benghazi in particular, caused Washington to give unusual deference to his judgments."

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdf
Click to expand...

That report is an inside job trying to absolve blame and basically attempting to blame the dead for their deaths.

But I cannot say that I am surprised that gullible hyper partisan twits like you would choose to believe them.

Stevens was not in Benghazi because he decided to take a little vacation. He was their as part of his mission in Libya under instructions from his bosses.
 
again.... please show us how the state department was supposed to have foretelling powers and be able to look into the future to know that Stevens' request for more security was more important and pressing that any other Ambassador's requests for more stuff. It is only in hindsight that we gain that perspective.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top