A beginner's guide to being an atheist, by Richard Dawkins

[Into the Night]

I think Dawkins is under-equiped to be a leading atheist spokesperson for science.

Dawkins denies science. He is not an atheist.

He's just a zoologist. He doesn't have any expert training or education in the fundamental physical and biological sciences.

Science is not a credential. Courtier's fallacy.

He doesn't understand physics and cosmology, and he doesn't seem to have any formal education in cellular biology and biochemistry. Those are the core scientific disciplines that allow one to speak authoritatively about life, the universe, and everything.

Science is not religion.

 

[gmark77]

ftfy
You only read things that you already know you're going to agree with.

That's a shitty way to learn a subject.

The reason I know more about atheism than most atheists, and more about religion than most Bible thumpers is because I keep an open mind and read both reputable atheists and legitimate Christian apologists.

You can always tell when Li'l Cypress gets a load in his diapers. He suddenly changes your posts and demands you be angry. Pitiful.

Oh, also, sweetie, you DO NOT know more about atheism than most atheists. You just demand people tell you you do. You are not unlike Trump in that respect.

 

[Cypress]

Oh, also, sweetie, you DO NOT know more about atheism than most atheists!

fyfy....I know more than you.
You insinuated anything and everything you needed to know about atheism was found in an eight word dictionary definition.

That shows a profound ignorance of the extensive literary and rhetorical production of the seminal atheist authors and influencers of the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries. I'm reading one of them right now.

 

[gmark77]

fyfy....I know more than you.

Clearly not.


And again, Cypress "fixes" a post because he's SO PISSED OFF he can't think.

Go ahead, Cy, change this one too. Make it look like I'm real mad.

LOLOLOLOLOL

Cue, 3, 2, 1.....