USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You keep mistaking this one for someone with an IQ or honesty.![]()
I know; but then, I'm an eternal optimist.

You keep mistaking this one for someone with an IQ or honesty.![]()
I know; but then, I'm an eternal optimist.![]()
Yes, I’m hoping to repost his better threads for comment by all.So far .................. this has been a really enlightening and mentally stimulating thread discussion.
(Will there be any more ILA thread discussions in the Future?)
I would be changing ILA’s original post. I didn’t want to do that.Stupid fuck, there's no reason she couldn't correct it.
If you can show me that rule, I’ll be glad to close my thread. I’m allowed to ban anyone from my threads I choose. If the rule isn’t written, it isn’t a rule.When the Thread Ban feature was first began, I could have sworn that there was a comment prohibiting "Revenge Banning"; but I guess it doesn't pertain to Rana.
![]()
It’s not resurrecting it, it’s reposting so those banned can discuss the subject.I am trying to decide if this resurrected thread, containing a blatant error, is dumber than the "Carve a T in your forehead" thread.
Yes, I’m hoping to repost his better threads for comment by all.
I got rid of Truth, USF is headed in the same direction.Yeah. Any chance the two leading Conservative 'Thinkers' (Truth Rejector and USF) will be able to actually make a comment about the OP?
(It looks like all they are doing is using you as a Human Punching Bag)![]()
If you can show me that rule, I’ll be glad to close my thread. I’m allowed to ban anyone from my threads I choose. If the rule isn’t written, it isn’t a rule.
I got rid of Truth, USF is headed in the same direction.
If you can provide the rule, I’ll close my thread. ThanksThis isn't about your ability to ban anyone; but instead of it being mentioned that Revenge Banning was verboten.
I believe it was Grind that mentioned it.
It could, eventually, but at least I gave others a chance, except him. He has his own thread for discussion.Hmmmm ... well then, this could look more and more like an ILA thread.![]()
Why close the thread*‘ and reopen it? Mod power?*This isn't about your ability to ban anyone; but instead of it being mentioned that Revenge Banning was verboten.
I believe it was Grind that mentioned it.
If you can provide the rule, I’ll close my thread. Thanks
It's as if Grind never warned against starting threads whining about being banned from a thread...
Guess what? Grind knew who was going to start all the whining threads...
I'm not saying he told me that...
If you can provide the rule, I’ll close my thread. Thanks
I don’t have to ask Grind, is it written in our rules? If it isn’t than I’m not breaking a rule. ThanksAsk Grind, using your personal MOD communication.
If you can provide the rule, I’ll close my thread. Thanks
If there IS a 'Rule', USF will be able to find it.
In either case, for the next 10 pages, USF will give us a blow by blow discussion of past events leading up to 'thread bannings'.![]()
Yes, he is tedious in that way. If it is a rule, it would be in the rules thread. I checked, no rule.If there IS a 'Rule', USF will be able to find it.
In either case, for the next 10 pages, USF will give us a blow by blow discussion of past events leading up to 'thread bannings'.![]()