50 years of failed eco predictions

the truth is trump did exceptionally well considering the levels of globalist zealotry sending vast chunks of our economy overseas.

Trump never exceeded Obama's best annual GDP growth.

He squandered Obama's recovery, and plunged us into a recession.
 
Of course an argument was presented.
Void argument fallacy.
you just didn't have a counter argument to it
Can't counter what doesn't exist.
so you lazily and sloppily slapped a false label on it so you didn't have to deal with it.
Void argument fallacy (again).
I bet you do that in your personal life too...when something gets too difficult for you, you just dismiss it and don't revisit it.
Psychoquackery.
You give up because you're a quitter by nature.
Psychoquackery.

No argument presented.
 
How...what? How did the 2017 tax cut result in recessions? Because it hoarded wealth at the top and gave no incentives to those at the top to spend.

Tax cuts were across the board. Successful businessmen do not hoard cash. It's poor financial practice due to inflation.
 

Unfortunately for you, BLS data proves me right and you wrong.


No. Strawman fallacy.

But he did, though.

Bush the Dumber only created net 480,000 jobs in 8 years...which means the 1M government jobs he created were the only reason he had any job growth during his term.

You remember Bush the Dumber, right? He's the guy you supported before it became uncomfortable to do so.


Fallacy fallacy. Racism.

By all means, explain how this is racism:

Now you're moving the goalposts because before, you were giving Drumpf credit for the job creation and low unemployment rate among Black people.

You're falling into the habit of dismissing everything that makes you upset.
 
You already have a keyboard. That's the thing you are typing on.
You already have a monitor. That's the thing you are staring at while I call you an idiot.
The necessary 5v power supply you can get for $5, crybaby. Even you on welfare can afford that.

Computers are built using circuit boards...didn't you know that??

OK, so first of all, the root of this conversation comes from you insisting that you could get a computer for $40.

You didn't say that you needed to have all these other components, you misrepresented that link (that I don't think you thought I would click on) as a computer to try and make whatever stupid point about computers costing less today than before.

But that wasn't a computer...it was a circuit board. And you would need to buy all the other components in order to make that component work.

Did you think you could bullshit your way through this?
 
Back
Top