50 years of failed eco predictions

[LV426]

Psychoquackery. No argument presented.

Right, you haven't presented an argument here. Correct.

 

[LV426]

Void argument fallacy. Buzzword fallacies.

That wasn't even in response to you, so you're butting into a conversation of which you weren't invited.

And where's this proof that your economic beliefs "work"?

 

[Into the Night]

Well, you certainly lack self-control...that's why you keep repeating these mantras.

Inversion fallacy.

What do you think you're accomplishing with them? Do you think anyone takes them seriously? Not even your "very fine people" take you seriously here.

You don't get to speak for anyone but you. Omniscience fallacy.

No argument presented.

 

[LV426]

Contextomy fallacy. Void context. No argument presented.

You ditch your arguments the moment someone holds them to scrutiny.

You did it on this thread, bro.

 

[Into the Night]

Yeah, right here:

Communism doesn't work.

 

[LV426]

$48 is rather affordable, even to a welfare case like you.

But that's not a computer, that's a motherboard.

You lied and said it was a computer, then you said it wasn't.

You can't even keep your bullshit straight.

Sloppy, sloppy work.

 

[Into the Night]

No you didn't, and I think you have brain damage because you're repeating something that isn't true, and you don't seem to realize you're doing it.

Inversion fallacy. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

The private sector does not spend $1 for every $1 of government spending you cut.

You don't know what they spend it on. You can't speak for anyone but yourself. Omniscience fallacy.

 

[LV426]

Argument by repetition. Tax cuts do not cause recession. Leaving money in the private sector does not cause recession.

Yes, tax cuts most definitely cause recessions because the net result of tax cuts is always LESS SPENDING, not more.

And if you cut spending, you contract the economy.

 

[Into the Night]

No you didn't. You're lying and scrambling because you just fucking stepped in a big pile of shit that you crapped out on this thread.

And everyone can look at this thread and see how you ran away from your own positions because you couldn't defend them.

Lie. RQAA.

No argument presented.

 

[LV426]

Void context. No argument presented.

Yes, you have not presented an argument here showing your economic beliefs "work".

 

[Into the Night]

But that's not a computer, that's a motherboard.

You lied and said it was a computer, then you said it wasn't.

You can't even keep your bullshit straight.

Sloppy, sloppy work.

It's a computer. It is not a motherboard. Argument by repetition fallacy. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

You lied and said you provided proof that your Austrian economics model "works".

But looking at the thread and your posting history reveals an absence of proof.

If you had it, you would have been linking to it under one of your other socks.

RQAA. YALSA. No argument presented.

 

[LV426]

Russia was being Russia.

How were they "being Russia"?

What's that got to do with Drumpf?

He was colluding with them.

Putin wants Democrats in power.

No, Putin wants Republicans in power, which is why he used his troll army to help Trump in 2016 and 2020.

Putin hates Democrats because Democrats sanction him and his buddies.

He's said so several times.

No he hasn't. This is another lie.

Why would a socialist want a conservative in office???

Putin's not a socialist, he's a fascist...and that's why the GOP loves him so much:

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, tax cuts most definitely cause recessions because the net result of tax cuts is always LESS SPENDING, not more.

And if you cut spending, you contract the economy.

Leaving money in the private sector does not cause a recession. Argument by repetition fallacy. No argument presented.

Tax cuts do not result in less spending by the government. It just prints the money instead...another form of theft of wealth.

 

[Nordberg]

Leaving money in the private sector does not contract the economy.

It does not grow it. Spending is what expands an economy. The real factor is demand. Keeping money in the private sector does not increase demand, which is what results in hiring and more production.

 

[LV426]

Government jobs don't count.

Almost all of the jobs Obama created were private sector jobs.

You're thinking of Bush the Dumber, who created 1M government jobs.

Presidents do not create jobs.

Now you're moving the goalposts because before, you were giving Trump credit for the job creation and low unemployment rate among Black people.

This is what I mean when I say you lost control...you can't even remember what you say from post to post.

 

[Into the Night]

Right, you haven't presented an argument here. Correct.

Mockery. Inversion fallacy. No argument presented.

 

[LV426]

Inversion fallacy.

I can always tell when you've reached the end of whatever you've been told to say because instead of defending yourself and your positions, you retreat to this weakness.

 

[Into the Night]

That wasn't even in response to you, so you're butting into a conversation of which you weren't invited.

JPP is not a private mail service.

And where's this proof that your economic beliefs "work"?

RQAA.

No argument presented.