50 years of failed eco predictions

[Into the Night]

OK, so you lied...I need other components in order to use that thing to post on JPP.

So basically, what you did was give me a tire and tell me that tire is a car.

You're really off your game today.

You already have a keyboard and monitor, right?
They are not part of a computer (although they are computers themselves).

Clearly, you have no idea what a computer is.

 

[Monad Portal]

No, it's due to poor policy choices and crap leadership.

which poor policy choices?

 

[Monad Portal]

lv246. tax cuts do have their place.

 

[Into the Night]

Repeating this mantra doesn't make it true.

Not once on this thread, or any thread for that matter, have you ever shown Austrian economics "works".

Already showed it does. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

Right, which is why if you cut government spending, and don't replace it with other spending, you contract the economy.

Leaving money in the private sector does not contract the economy.

 

[Into the Night]

Really? Show me where. Use quotes, please.

Already did. RQAA. Since you want to deny your own argument, anyone that wants to can go look it up for themselves.

 

[LV426]

Thought terminating cliche fallacy.

But you have and the evidence is the lack of detail and commitment to your arguments.

 

[Into the Night]

You're only saying it's irrelevant because you have no fucking argument to make against it.

Bush league.

Contextomy fallacy. Void context.

 

[Into the Night]

Now you're just avoiding answering for your lack of commitment to your argument.

Void question.

 

[Into the Night]

money in peoples pockets does create jobs as they spend it.

that's just a fact.

it's not the solution to all our problems however.

The government taking money out of your pocket does not create jobs (other than in government). It destroys them.

 

[Into the Night]

Right, but that tax cut was bought and paid for by Russia, with the goal of destabilizing the budget...or in other words, fiscal terrorism.

Russia paid for tax cuts?????? You're not even making sense!

 

[Into the Night]

you need to start being economically honest, into the night, instead of being a zealous fascist fucktard.

Not a fascist. I do not condone government manipulation of markets.

 

[Into the Night]

chinese mercantilism is a bigger threat.

Why is trade a threat?

 

[Into the Night]

So is that why Trump couldn't match Obama's best year of job growth after his tax cut?

Hell, Trump couldn't even match Obama's last 3 years of job growth.

Lie.

 

[LV426]

Inversion fallacy.

Another mantra.

Are you OK? You seem to be losing control.

 

[Into the Night]

Into the Night, or GFM and IBDaMann, knows nothing about economics and has exhausted all the notes he's been given.

YALSA. Inversion fallacy.

 

[LV426]

Yes you are.

Oh word? How so?

It's not about my security to respond or not. Psychoquackery.

Right, it's your insecurity that prompts you to respond with this gibberish...you're insecure because you don't know enough about this subject to debate it, but you need the attention and crave the acknowledgement.

That's why you can't let things go, ergo these posts of yours.

Get over yourself. You're not that great.

 

[LV426]

Lie.

Manufacturing lost 300,000 jobs in 2019 and the economy shrank for three straight months, culminating in the start of the recession in February 2020.

 

[Into the Night]

he's very knowledgeable.

Thanks.

he knows spending creates jobs. he's just gotten used to irrational libs who think thats the amswer to all our prayers.

A reasonable assessment...and my apologies.

our two party system only knows extremism. it warps all of us.

There are more than two parties. There's the Socialist party, the Green party, the Libertarian party, the Democrat party, the Republican party, the Technocrat party, etc.

There are, however, only two factions: Those that want to preserve the Constitution and those that want to destroy it. Democrats routinely discard and ignore the Constitution and all State constitutions.

 

[LV426]

You already have a keyboard and monitor, right?

We were talking about the affordability of computers, not what components we might already have.

You lost the throughline.