These judges know their decision is wrong but they are obviously taking huge bribes from the illegal alien lobby and repubs need to say that.
Gee, yea learning something new everyday.. I didn't know illegal aliens had their own lobby..........


These judges know their decision is wrong but they are obviously taking huge bribes from the illegal alien lobby and repubs need to say that.
Gee, yea learning something new everyday.. I didn't know illegal aliens had their own lobby..........
HAHAHA. Did you really say that?? Of course illegals have their own lobby. All the countries of central america pay our congressmen to support illegals. And corporate america also pays the congressmen to do the same.
THE ILLEGAL ALIEN LOBBY IS HUGE.
Only thing huge is your stupidity, & yea, the board takes note of it every time you post............
This thread is a perfect example of why the threadban function is needed. Started out good, quickly devolved into poo-slinging by the usual gang of idiots. *sigh*
The May 17 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit overturns a lower court's determination that the administration hadn't done anything wrong either in ending DACA or in the way it went about doing it. The Department of Homeland Security didn't adequately explain its rationale for ending the Obama-era program, the appeals court said in a 2-1 decision.
https://www.bloomberglaw.com/document/XCBC2D2O000000
Time for the right to blame the judges. Anything but accept the truth.
Nobody calls me stupid, esp not a degenerate tranny like you. You're so dumb you don't even know if you're male of female. HAHAHA
The judges are 100% at fault here.
There is nothing in the Constitution to prevent executive actions and orders from being erased by subsequent administrations. This was not lawful Article I legislation that Trump torpedoed. It wasn't even lawful, period.
You leftists continue to make a mockery of the courts, which is why I say that leftists are inherently unqualified to sit on higher appellate courts in the US.
You don't subscribe to constitutionalism or the rule of law.
Your legal theory has become supplementing the legislative process with ideology.
"Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
Time for the right to blame the judges. Anything but accept the truth."
Hello Howard,
Called it.
Got it. So when Obama did it, it was illegal. When Trump did it, it was supported and just. In your right biased view, of course.
How convenient for the right to believe so. Thus denying the reality that the nation is designed to have all views represented.
That is blatantly false.
That's interesting to hear you've decided that. But then, since there is no way to reconcile your position while also believing in the beauty of the Constitution recognizing that many various views must be incorporated to make America function, it makes sense you'd hold such a position.
"Originally Posted by PoliTalker View Post
Time for the right to blame the judges. Anything but accept the truth."
Hello Howard,
Called it.
Got it. So when Obama did it, it was illegal. When Trump did it, it was supported and just. In your right biased view, of course.
How convenient for the right to believe so. Thus denying the reality that the nation is designed to have all views represented.
That is blatantly false.
That's interesting to hear you've decided that. But then, since there is no way to reconcile your position while also believing in the beauty of the Constitution recognizing that many various views must be incorporated to make America function, it makes sense you'd hold such a position.
Interesting, I feel the same way about conservatives and their mockery of the courts, especially your party leader, Donald Trump.The judges are 100% at fault here. There is nothing in the Constitution to prevent executive actions and orders from being erased by subsequent administrations. This was not lawful Article I legislation that Trump torpedoed. It wasn't even lawful, period.
You leftists continue to make a mockery of the courts, which is why I say that leftists are inherently unqualified to sit on higher appellate courts in the US. You don't subscribe to constitutionalism or the rule of law. Your legal theory has become supplementing the legislative process with ideology.
The May 17 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit overturns a lower court's determination that the administration hadn't done anything wrong either in ending DACA or in the way it went about doing it. The Department of Homeland Security didn't adequately explain its rationale for ending the Obama-era program, the appeals court said in a 2-1 decision.
https://www.bloomberglaw.com/document/XCBC2D2O000000
Please. Everything you posted is a lie or ignorant. However, when Obama did something unconstitutional, it can't have been unconstitutional for Trump to remedy it via reversal. What is unlawful is for Trump to reapportion DOD funds toward his own projects, such as building the wall. It would be perfectly legitimate for a future president to stop that by directing the funds back to where they were originally purposed. According to idiot leftists on the 4th, however, it would be unlawful for a future president to touch Trump's DOD wall funding. Which is about what I would expect from leftist "jurists."
Welcome back, I missed you.
I understand that completely!Hello Phantasmal,
Thanks.
I'm having a wonderful life. I like this place, but there is so much more to life than this. I don't want something like this to dominate my life. I have to live it. It's good to get away from it once in a while. Lends perspective.
Well, Super Moderator, are you going to lie again about ignoring my posts after you replied to one yesterday?I understand that completely!
Well, Super Moderator, are you going to lie again about ignoring my posts after you replied to one yesterday?
Hm...
It's called the radical Democrat Socialist Congressional party, Snowflake.
I understand that completely!