3 men guilty of murder in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery

The entire fucking society.

And blame Arbery again for his own murder. We didn't hear you the first time.

Quit your fucking whining. You say it's so, so you believe it. Get off your ass and make something of yourself and quit blaming everyone else for your failures.

Read what I wrote. That in my opinion on the matter. I also said some time back that 3 on 1 doesn't require a firearm. Let that stir in your omnipresent brain.
 
Your Georgia Klan buddies chased him in their cars, hurled threatening verbal abuse at him, hit him with their car, threatened to "blow his head off", and in their own words, finally "cornered him like a rat".

The kid tried to run away from them, repeatedly, but when your armed Klansmen finally had him cornered, the jury determined he felt he had to defend himself against three verbally abusive, armed men who had been chasing him for ten minutes.

I'm not from Georgia and I have no "Klan buddies." Again, read what I wrote, that is my opinion.
 

Aubrey wasn't jogging. Aubrey wasn't chased down. Aubrey was a thief. When Aubrey was confronted, he attacked the guy with the shotgun and tried to beat on him......then he was shot.

This wasn't justice. The "white" guys had no criminal record. Aubrey did. He was in a neighborhood hw shouldn't have been lurking in.

I don't know how anyone can watch this video and declare the "white" guys murders. I watched the trial, did you?
:palm:

 
Aubrey wasn't jogging. Aubrey wasn't chased down. Aubrey was a thief. When Aubrey was confronted, he attacked the guy with the shotgun and tried to beat on him......then he was shot.

This wasn't justice. The "white" guys had no criminal record. Aubrey did. He was in a neighborhood hw shouldn't have been lurking in.

I don't know how anyone can watch this video and declare the "white" guys murders. I watched the trial, did you?
:palm:


The verdict suggested that the jury agreed with prosecutors’ arguments that Mr. Arbery posed no imminent threat to the men and that the men had no reason to believe he had committed a crime, giving them no legal right to chase him through their suburban neighborhood.
 
Owl: "You try to run around it"
Jack: The Jogger DID run around it.

Owl: "The driver comes out, fires at you"
Jack: Why would the Driver fire at the Jogger?

The only reason would be if the Jogger ran towards the Driver and tried to grab his shotgun.


Now, I completely understand the Wokesters Narrative here. 3 Rednecks, driving around, looking for some nigger to kill because, hey, there's not much else to do today.
But, the reality is that 3 Homeowners are concerned with 'crime in the neighborhood'. They went and talked to some Homeless guy that lived under a Bridge. They didn't kill him. They just wanted to talk to the guy and see what he had to say. I imagine they wanted to talk to the Jogger in the same manner.

They had already confronted him three times. This was number four.
 
Time to call the Cops. For some reason, he didn't want to talk to them.
If the Jogger felt threatened, time for HIM to call the Cops.

He didn't have a phone. Good grief, have you read anything about the events of that day?
 
He didn't have a phone. Good grief, have you read anything about the events of that day?

Not really. Bits and pieces, along with the Video. It seems like the Jogger could have kept on jogging and ignored the 3 people. Or jogged to a friend's house or his own home and called 911.

Now, both Owl and Dutch claim, whether Police, a Bank Robber, Citizen Joe, or someone in a dark alley, you should always run towards the gun. If there is a gun, always run toward the gun. Naturally, I didn't want to argue with them.




:kipyes:
 
Not really. Bits and pieces, along with the Video. It seems like the Jogger could have kept on jogging and ignored the 3 people. Or jogged to a friend's house or his own home and called 911.

Now, both Owl and Dutch claim, whether Police, a Bank Robber, Citizen Joe, or someone in a dark alley, you should always run towards the gun. If there is a gun, always run toward the gun. Naturally, I didn't want to argue with them.




:kipyes:

I'll accept that your excuse that you are arguing from ignorance so you can be different. Which of course makes you the biggest conformist here. Carry on.
 
And they will lose that appeal.

The prosecution of the rednecks was pretty masterful. The chief prosecutor didn't leave too many openings for a viable appeal. The fact of the matter is that Arbery's past had absolutely nothing to do with what the rednecks chose to do that day. They saw a black kid running down their lily-white street, so they concluded there must be something amiss. Come to find out, though, that Arbery was unarmed and possessed nothing which had been taken from any construction site. Every single decision they made during that incident was an incorrect one.

Furthermore, Travis McMichael knew nothing of Arbery's criminal past, so that can't be a factor on which to base an appeal...
But, but, but...there were black people seated in the courtroom.

Every day.

That's not fair.
 
Back
Top